Last Week's Biggest Sales
1. CARROLL GARDENS $2,100,000 235 President Street GMAP (left) This 4-family brownstone was listed for $1,995,000 in October and sold very quickly, according to StreetEasy. Entered into contract on 10/30/09; closed on 12/17/09; deed recorded on 12/24/09. 2. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $1,650,000 75 Livingston Street, #11D GMAP (right) Appears that the listing trail/stats on this co-op…

1. CARROLL GARDENS $2,100,000
235 President Street GMAP (left)
This 4-family brownstone was listed for $1,995,000 in October and sold very quickly, according to StreetEasy. Entered into contract on 10/30/09; closed on 12/17/09; deed recorded on 12/24/09.
2. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $1,650,000
75 Livingston Street, #11D GMAP (right)
Appears that the listing trail/stats on this co-op are MIA. (If anyone can find ’em, please let us know in the comments.) The history of the building was recently the subject of a Streetscapes column. Closed on 12/15/09; deed recorded on 12/23/09.
3. DUMBO $1,525,000
100 Jay Street #28H GMAP
Second big sale in as many weeks in the J Condo. This 1,592-sf, 2-bedroom was listed for what it sold for in October, per StreetEasy. Its seller purchased the unit for $1,370,000 in ’07. Entered into contract on 11/12/09; closed on 12/7/09; deed recorded on 12/23/09.
4. PARK SLOPE $1,522,283
392 3rd Street #1 GMAP
This is the Slope building where a fire broke out a couple weeks ago, leaving two people injured. It was recently converted from a rental into a condo, and this 2,700-sf duplex was initially listed for $1,695,000 in March. Entered into contract on 7/1/09; closed on 10/30/09; deed recorded on 12/23/09.
5. BOERUM HILL $1,100,000
33 St. Marks Place GMAP
This is a 3,600-sf, 3-family, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 9/29/09; closed on 12/1/09; deed recorded on 12/22/09.
Photos from Property Shark.
re: st. marks house, and Petebklyn’s comment that “It seems a dark and dreary block but may have picked up in recent years.”
I’ve lived on this block since 92. I guess the enormous trees (planted in 91) cast shadows, but otherwise I can’t think what’s dark and dreary about the block, unless Pete is using dark and dreary as a euphemism for something, I’m not sure what. In any case, the block has had a strong sense of community for as long as I’ve been here. It’s a block where on a snowy morning, two or three good samaritans shovel the whole sidewalk, 3rd to 4th avenue, where block parties are community affairs, with rides for kids, as well as drinks for adults, where the whole neighborhood got together to get rid of drug dealers a few years back.
The house mentioned is a wreck, and so it’s actually a surprisingly high price, considering it’ll need a gut renovation to make it livable. I hope the people purchasing plan to live there, and that it’s not a reno and flip investment.
I know I am late to this post, but the President Street is over 5,000 square feet on one of the nicest blocks in CG (24×54!)- only $400 a square foot. I saw this property and thought it was great – in pretty good shape with lots of light. It was purposely priced low for a quick sale because an old lady owned it.
This property would have gone for $3M+ in late 2006. The market is still very shaky. With the interest rates going up in the first quarter, expect things to linger, especially buildings needing a lot of work.
Bulls win. You had the entire US government on your side, something DIBS still doesn’t quite understand. But to understand it he’d have to ditch his warmed over CNBC libertarianism, and that’s never happening.
Coupla comments: The bank bonuses are moving through the system, the Feds are backing mortgages, manipulating rates, and trying to work an orderly unwind, maybe even a long term dollar depreciation. Of course high end non-tradables are holding up (though not keeping pace with gold).
Let’s be clear what you stakeholders are rooting for: massive government intervention in markets, mis-managed financial firms operating with implicit gov backstops, and the further gutting of the Brooklyn middle class. You’re the very same ninnies who will come on a different thread and complain about the strollers and the 4 dollar coffee at Stumptown.
Finally, most of the federal interventions in the housing market are being phased out over the next six months. You unequivocally won the near term argument. But we’ll see; even DIBS knows that the past is no guarantee of future performance. Best of luck.
I was surprised to the see the 31 Joralemon St price as well. I looked at it too. I was actually surprised at how little noise I actually heard from the BQE. I actually thought the location was a plus, cobble stone street near the new Brooklyn Bridge Park etc. What scared me off was that it needed a complete gut renovation. That said, had I known how “flexible” the sellers were…
I walked by the Joralemon place and I made an appointment with the realtor to see it, but she called me the day before and cancelled because they already had an offer and sub-offer.
I’m not sure if I’m just crying sour grapes, but the sound of the BQE was LOUD and would have, after a while, driven me nuts. Think of it… every time you open a window you hear traffic zooming by like a swarm of bees. Every time you exit your home you hear traffic zooming by like a swarm of bees. Every time you sit in your backyard you hear traffic zooming by like a swarm of bees. How long until you go nuts? How many bees can one man take?
But the daily walk to the subway would be beautiful.
1.075 does seem cheap for the Joralemon place. I wonder if they must have needed money fast, or a cash deal or something. It was gone in no time. I’m sort of impressed by the low ball offer. 1.5mm and they initially offered what? 900K? I wouldn’t have had the guts!
I know the President building. Wide place, decent shape, 4 really large and bright units, not high rents but new owners intend on taking over the place — that won’t be cheap. People still have money I guess.
Miss Muffett delivers long distance!!!
… and with a stinging blow!
Interesting link, MM.
Out of town with spotty internet connection. Here’s a response to 11217’s endless cheerleading:
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/30/business/economy/30econ.html?hp
Thanks Pigeon. I think Buffett was onto something when he said just recently, “I’d rather be in the West than the East.â€