Last Week's Biggest Sales
1. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $3,200,000 32 College Place GMAP (left) A 2,820-square-foot, single-family house, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 12/9/08; closed on 2/11/09; deed recorded on 3/20/09. 2. COBBLE HILL $2,300,000 17 Cheever Place GMAP (right) This 2,488-sf two-family hit the market in June, listed at $2,750,000; the price was subsequently decreased to…

1. BROOKLYN HEIGHTS $3,200,000
32 College Place GMAP (left)
A 2,820-square-foot, single-family house, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 12/9/08; closed on 2/11/09; deed recorded on 3/20/09.
2. COBBLE HILL $2,300,000
17 Cheever Place GMAP (right)
This 2,488-sf two-family hit the market in June, listed at $2,750,000; the price was subsequently decreased to $2,575,000. The house had been “meticulously gut-renovated to perfection,” according to its listing; the sellers bought it for $1,130,000 in early ’06. Entered into contract on 11/10/08; closed on 3/6/09; deed recorded on 3/16/09.
3. PROSPECT HEIGHTS $2,000,000
210 Prospect Place GMAP
This 3,633-sf, single-family townhouse was first listed for $2,495,000 last summer; the price was dropped to $2,250,000 in October. As noted in a House of the Day post, its owners gave it an extreme makeover. Entered into contract on 2/5/09; closed on 3/10/09; deed recorded on 3/19/09.
4. PARK SLOPE $1,620,824
520 8th Street GMAP
This 3,000-sf, three-family last sold for $999,999 in late 2007, according to Property Shark. Entered into contract on 3/6/09; closed on 3/6/09; deed recorded on 3/18/09.
5. CARROLL GARDENS $1,575,000
356 President Street GMAP
This 4,500-square-foot house was listed for $1,820,000 when it got House of the Day treatment last November. Entered into contract on 1/19/09; closed on 3/10/09; deed recorded on 3/18/09.
Photos from Property Shark.
Is that it?? No more discussion?? BHO???? cornerbodega, we haven’t heard anything insightful from you lately.???? Did you get shut down for overpricing the milk???
Parkedslope: I agree with you that values are in a state of transition, and that’s why we are seeing reduced transactions, buyer-seller stalemates, and price cuts. Basically, the selling side (including owners, brokers, and perhaps some of the banks? look at the larger bank-balance sheet stalemate nationally) refuse to believe that values have gone down. Buyers, on the other hand, refuse to buy at prices which have skyrocketed in recent years to unsustainable highs. So, we are seeing things like buyers walking away from large deposits since the expectations are that, with values set to go down more than 10%, buyers will still do better cutting these losses and waiting for price declines. And part of the reason that buyers are waiting on the sidelines is precisely because asking prices have not come down enough, since too many sellers/brokers insist that properties are worth more than what buyers want to pay. The only way to break the cycle is for sellers to cut prices, which the most serious sellers are indeed starting to do, sometimes dramatically. Then sales prices start to go down. This in turn, affects comps, which in turn affects “values”. It’s a process, and it does not happen quickly so that’s why individual properties may still recently have been “valued” relatively high (if that value was based on earlier comps, when values were higher).
Miss Muffett & Mopar: where are these properties that have suddenly lost tons & tons of value? I have an especially hard time believing: “Prices in NYC have already dropped 40 percent and are dropping further.”
I just did a refi on a PS coop & the appraisal came-in $110K OVER my fall 2006 purchase price.
Please, oh please, tell me you’re not basing this simply on the asking/sale price differences that are reported here…
I hate to pick a team to side with, but the bulls are certainly throwing around a lot less BS than the bears.
Lechacal – also, remember that given how slowly RE moves, you have little to lose by waiting. The days of a sudden, brisk run up are probably behind us for years to come, so that is not a risk. In other words, time is on your side. I too am impatient in that I would love to just buy my new place and be done with it, but there is too much at stake financially now to act precipitously and I really am certain that by waiting, we will get a much better deal. Severl properties we were considering months ago have had several price cuts and are already cheaper now than what we had thought would have been a reasonable price months ago. In fact, “reasonable” values are clearly being re-defined, as is clear by all that’s happening in our economy.
Given the very reasonable definition of “Team Reasonable”, isn’t pretty much everyone on “Team Reasonable.” Does this mean we can put the whole “team” business aside?
Dave, you may well be right. As I posted yesterday I am considering jumping in later this year. But I have a long history of acting on my predictions of market trends a bit too early. Now that the price declines are a reality, I have to counsel myself to continue to be patient.
Sebb, on what basis do you say that Miss Muffett is losing money? I think it is almost universally accepted at this point that prices have come down to some extent.
Oh Sebb – why do you insist on saying I’m losing money? By having sold before the crash, I made more than I would have had I waited. The modest rent I’m paying now is more than offset (including mortgage deduction) by the price declines my previous property has already suffered, and the declines I am seeing on properties we’ve looked at. Please don’t waste time making nonsensical comments.
Lechacal…the only thing i disagree with is that the “downward leg of the market will take a couple of years to resolve itself.” I think by the end of this year we will be close to the bottom.
Not sure how long recovery to peak levels will take. There are too many unkowable exogenous economic trends at play right now.
Otherwise, I’m here because I enjoy real estate porn and I like riling up the Team Bear members. I especially like BHO’s calculations when he starts with them.