130-Summit-Street-1009.jpg
At first blush, this three-family house at 130 Summit Street looked like agreat deal to us: $1,350,000 for a four-story house with lots of charm in Carroll Gardens? Sign us up. But then comes the heartbreaking fine print: The 3rd floor apartment has a dreaded rent-controlled tenant paying $325 a month. (Approximately $1,600 under market. Ridiculous!) Anyway, we’ll let the quants out there decide how big a discount to market value that should mean for the house. Still might be a decent play, except for the fact that the rent controlled tenant’s location means the owner won’t be able to expand beyond a duplex.
130 Summit Street [Douglas Elliman] GMAP P*Shark



What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Minard
    sometimes I agree with you and sometimes I don;t
    my father and my elderly aunt were both RC tenants in Queens
    paying $400 and $325 respectively until they passed away in 2001 and 2003. whereas people coming into their buildings were probably paying well above $1000 in rent.
    But the people coming in now are also making $50K-75K and can afford that. What’s a little old retiree supposed to do when her SS check is $400 a month and maybe her pension is $600 a month?

  2. I got news for all of youse.

    The rent control tenant is less of a discount/problem than the

    BBBBBBUUUUUUUUUZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    from the BQE.

    keep your windows shut.

    or cover the BQE = big upside for this prop.

  3. From my understanding; and this is based on people/friends telling me that have lived in large stabilized buildings.

    When a rent Controlled/Stabilized unit becomes vacant, a landlord can spruce it up and increase the rent a certain percentage. After doing this several times and the apt has reached a certain $$ amount, then it becomes destabilized/decontrolled and they can get market value.

    how does it work in a small 3-family like this?

1 2 3 4 5