586-4th-Street-0708.jpg
$3 million is no longer a lay-up asking price in Park Slope, but this limestone house at 586 4th Street seems to have what it takes. It’s in a Park block, generously proportioned and chock full of original details like parquet floors, mahogany paneling and plaster crown moldings. Do you agree that the $2,999,999 asking price is realistic?
586 4th Street [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I think 2.6, (even if the mechanicals are not updated) is totally unrealistic.

    Even 2.8 would sound like a relative bargain to me for this house.

    I believe comps would support a 3 million dollar asking/selling price, even with the softening market.

  2. What’s the square footage? If you figure 1100 pef floor (20 x 55), 3 floors + garden level, that’s 4400, which puts $psf at 682 – not bad for very prime property in perfect location. But Property Shark (which I know sometimes has errors) lists it only at 3390 sf, which is 885 psf, significantly heftier.

  3. Nice listing written in actual English for a change.

    The exterior is amazing … Facade and side-windows. 55 x 20, etc.

    Interior is just ok for a $3MM house. I don’t see any plaster medallions and the ceilings look very plain (drywall patch-overs?!). The kitchen is crap for this price-point. Plus, 55′ deep building WITH extension makes for a tiny yard (only 20 deep) and a dark dining room.

    Last nitpick – don’t price a $3MM house at $2,999,999 … It makes you look silly (like you’re selling something on an infomercial). $2,999,000 works just fine.

  4. I’d rather have the third exposure facing an apartment building than on a busy corner which is the situation for most three exposure type buildings. Fantastic house, I agree that it’s better to be right off the park than on PPW. Only serious downside is walk, or should I say the hike to the train. The F sucks and the 2/3 is pretty far.

  5. If the mechanicals have been updated any time recently, they ALWAYS mention that in the listings for this sort of house.

    Two quibbles with this place: While there is a third exposure, it is exposed to the back of the apartment building, so I am not a fan of that. Also, the backyard is rather small.

    Sweet looking house though. I’m guessing it goes for 2.6. Less if it needs mechanical updates.

  6. I believe it said 2 families in 99 years, Denton.

    And there’s no reason to assume that just because someone has lived in a place a long time, that they automatically don’t update the building.

1 2 3 4