78-3rd-place-Brooklyn-0108.jpg
When did average-sized houses in Carroll Gardens start being worth over $3 million? Whenever it was, we didn’t get the memo. Last month, it was 44 1st Place, a generally attractive but inconsistent four-story house asking $3,842,500. (One reader wrote us a particularly nasty email about our stance on that post.) Now it’s 78 3rd Place, a 3,100-square-foot, three-story brick that, while 23-feet-wide and full of charm, doesn’t feel like it’s worth quite $3,495,000. Are we just out of touch with the Carroll Gardens market or sellers overreaching?
78 3rd Place [Corcoran] GMAP P*Shark


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. 5:56, they didn’t just say they preferred CG/CH to PS. They also said they liked it more and others should like it more because it is closer to Manhattan. That is nonsense as the comments about N and Q trains make clear.

  2. Caroll Gardens may be NICE, but it’s NOT $3.5 million nice–are you serious?? That is the issue here. That is what people are debating.

    This tiny and non-descript house is asking $200K MORE than the perfectly renovated house at 270 Berkeley in the Slope that just sold and was 5 stories and 5000 sq. ft.

    It is also asking $500K MORE than 30 South Portland, another 5-story 5000+ sq ft beauty on a gorgeous block in a great neighborhood.

    There is no way to justify the price on this Carroll Gardens house. Unless, of course, you are telling me that there is a major typo and the house is indeed in Brooklyn Heights.

  3. if more people preferred carroll gardens over park slope, as you say 5:56, the prices would reflect that.

    they do not, however.

    park slope is a more expensive neighborhoos than carroll gardens.

    also much larger.

  4. Small, mediocre house in a nice neighborhood–NOT worth anywhere near $3.5 million. RIDICULOUS. This house wouldn’t sell for that price in the Heights or in Park Slope–that’s why people are bringing up those nabes. Sorry!

1 7 8 9 10 11 28