174ClintonAvenue110107.jpg
Here’s one person who probably won’t be winning any “Neighbor of the Year” awards: The owner of 174 Clinton Avenue. After buying the four-story brick-and-brownstone house back in 2005 for $1,055,860, he subdivided the 200-foot-deep lot this summer and sold the back half to the developer who’s now building next to the restaurant Luz. (The extent to which that structure adds or detracts from the neighborhood remains to be seen.) In the meantime, he obtained permission last week for a curb cut on Clinton Avenue and then wasted no time in putting the property on the market for $2,500,000. Since Clinton Hill was rezoned back in July, the rest of the houses on this block fall under R6B zoning, according to which curb cuts are prohibited for properties less than 40 feet wide; because 174 Clinton Avenue falls (barely) within 100 feet of Myrtle Avenue, however, there’s a “commercial overlay” of the R7A zoning. Adding insult to injury, the approved application calls for a “curb cut to allow for vehicular access to one-car garage in front of existing old-code building.” The listing verbiage backs this up: “The seller has gotten approval for the curb cut, driveway and enclosed garage.” Can the intention really be to construct a new garage in the front yard of this house? That would be completely whack. Unfortunately the historic district ends up the block at Willoughby so there’s no Landmark protection either. Garage or not, the whole thing also flies in the face of the streetscape beautification plans that the Myrtle Avenue Revitalization Project is promoting for the corner of Clinton and Myrtle. Charming. This is exactly why City Planning is currently working on a Yards Text Amendment. We really hope we’re wrong on this one.
174 Clinton Avenue [Brown Harris Stevens] GMAP P*Shark DOB


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Oh come on, Brownstoner. Isn’t this just an example of an owner using this property as he/she pleases? That always seems to be the guiding principle when rent protection laws are discussed on this blog. But this is about preserving a view, so I guess that trumps an owner’s rights….

  2. Agree that it doesn’t all ad up, but the DOB permit clearly says it’s on Clinton Avenue: “Curb cut is located on West side of Clinton Avenue 76′-2″ South of the intersection of Myrtle Avenue and Clinton Avenue and is 9′-5″ in length with two 1′-6″ splay.”

  3. Seems absolutely ridiculous.

    I can understand subdividing the lot if it was 200 feet deep. That way, you’d still have the normal 100 foot deep lot with the old house.

    However, why would you make a curb cut and install a driveway in front of the 19th century townhouse? I don’t get it.

    The listing says demolition has begun. Demolition of what? The front of the building? Could there be a mistake in the description? Maybe the curb cut is to allow access to one car garage in the “back” not “front” of the old code building? That would make more sense – a garage on Vanderbilt? If you constructed a garage in the front, you certainly would not get 2.5 million, and would most definitely devalue the property from the perspective of any buyer in the market for this type of house in this neighborhood.

  4. If this owner can’t be a good neighbor, then the neighbors don’t have to be good bad. Protests, signs, complaints, news media. Maybe the owner will back down. Who needs a car over there anyway. Kind of like that jerk at Cumberland and Dekalb who yells at people hanging too close to the fence protecting his TWO ugly SUVs.

1 2