111-Hicks-Street-1108.jpg
$500 a foot in prime Brooklyn Heights? You betcha. There is one catch with well-located and well-appointed pad: A distinct shortage of windows. The railroad-style apartment has just two windows at the front; for a space that’s roughly 70-feet deep, that’s not a lot of natural light. On the other hand, it’s been nicely renovated and, at $699,000, is a heckuva a lot cheaper because of the lack of natural light. How do you think this will fare on the open market?
111 Hicks Street [Brown Harris Stevens] GMAP P*Shark
111-Hicks-Floorplan-1108.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Also, add this to the pantheon of broker listing lies: this is NOT a 2Br.
    No window = no bedroom.
    Put a fork in it. All the frosted glass in the world can’t conceal that this place is a dump!

  2. This is a joke!! Not sure why nobody has flamed about the ‘if this were SoHo’ comments, but even in Manhattan, this place would be a loser….
    Just think: $1K per month per window!

  3. NorthHeights, that’s very interesting and kudos to the Board for their efforts in communicating various information in this way to the shareholders. However, I can’t easily ascertain from the website how this building is different than a typical co-op, i.e., the types of expenses noted are what one would expect.

    It seems Ringo’s post gives the “real” answer.

  4. Regarding the maintenance on this building, the “why” is complicated. They had a number of structural issues — one having to do with an infamous pool that was in the basement. But the bigger issues were having to do with a lawsuit with contractors and then two failed restaurants in their commercial space and THOSE lawsuits. They’ve had to spend a lot of money on this kind of crap and meanwhile, their hallways, etc are in need of updating.

    As I said, I’ve heard they’re moving ahead. But who knows.

1 2 3 4