Condo of the Day: 145 Park Place, #2B
The owners of this two-bed, two-bath condo at 145 Park Place are selling the place they’ve owned since early 2007, but it’s not to leave the building. They’re buying a bigger place upstairs. In addition to the location, this place has a good layout going for it. The price of $925,000, however, seems pretty aggressive,…
The owners of this two-bed, two-bath condo at 145 Park Place are selling the place they’ve owned since early 2007, but it’s not to leave the building. They’re buying a bigger place upstairs. In addition to the location, this place has a good layout going for it. The price of $925,000, however, seems pretty aggressive, especially since they only paid $695,960 for it a year and a half ago. Anyone have any general comments about this building?
145 Park Place, 2B [FSBO] GMAP P*Shark
Condos of the Day: Park Place Doubleshot [Brownstoner]
Lots of Price Cutting at the Park Place Condominium [Brownstoner]
I didn’t post one comment about this apartment, cause it’s boring indeed, overpriced, overhyped.
Nothing spectacular, nothing to Wow over.
Snark Slope is most definitely funny. And Tiefighter, you are an obvious shill. You think we all just fell off the turnip truck?
Ok, gotta defend Snark….just because.
“And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life.”
Not true, but if it makes you feel better to believe that, then follow your bliss.
“And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life.”
I’m not sure about that, but every one of his posts is positively hilarious.
I’ll congratulate them if they get 7 figures. It would be a great vote of confidence from the market.
Won’t happen though.
If you love this place, why buy when you could rent something as nice for WAY LESS. . .
Unless you think the market is just going to zoom up in the next coupla years. . .
And you, SnarkSlope, have never posted a positive comment in your life.
Do they even have the tax abatement yet? Last time I looked at this building (which was about 6 months ago) although almost fully occupied, they had not yet secured the tax abatement and so the taxes were through the roof (compared with other new constructions). Isn’t the doorman only part-time? This price is really high, but I do like the building other than the flaws I identified.
Whatever, tiefighter. Since this is the first and only thread you’ve chosen to comment upon, your shilling is rather suspect.