stuy-heights-house-1208.jpgWe had mixed emotions reading the Times Real Estate story this weekend about the older artist couple who financed the purchase of a Stuyvesant Heights brownstone four years ago by selling a Basquiat that one of them had picked up for $100 back in the Eighties. (Anyone know what block this is?) Aren’t there enough brownstones that have already been stripped of their original detail that someone wanting to create a modern space could avoid destroying yet another piece of history? Yes, these folks were considerate enough to call in a salvage company to save the architectural artifacts, but it’s still a bummer. And how about all that tree-cutting? What a soap opera! Update: Okay, it’s sounding like the Times article might have overstated how salvageable the interiors of this place were, so it’s looking like we came down a little too hard on these folks. Apologies.
Bankrolled by a Basquiat [NY Times]
Photo by Gabriele Stabile for The New York Times


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Sam, are you saying that even plaster and partitions from 1890 are worthy of salvation?

    Even the fireplaces, originally used (obviously) to heat the house, are no longer required with a modernized heating system. To replace the flues and rebuild the fireboxes just to reuse the original mantles is a vanity project if ever there was.

  2. How could there have been “nothing left”? There is nothing left now, that’s for sure. Unless there was a fire in the house, I’m sure the plaster and partitions, and stair and fireplaces were in. Imagine buying a brownstone and removing the fireplaces! Unbelievable. I bet this couple moves back to Manhattan or to L.A. in about ten months. -They will leave behind a motherload of sheetrock.

1 2 3 4 5 6 8