Lesbians Sniff Out Values in Kensington
We’ve all heard that if a real estate investor wants to find the next hot nabe, he only needs to find where the artists and gay people are moving. According to The Observer, though, it pays to watch a particular subset of the gay community: Lesbians. “Practical, and always in search of domesticity, lesbians are…

We’ve all heard that if a real estate investor wants to find the next hot nabe, he only needs to find where the artists and gay people are moving. According to The Observer, though, it pays to watch a particular subset of the gay community: Lesbians. “Practical, and always in search of domesticity, lesbians are handy urban pioneers, dragging organic groceries and prenatal yoga to the ‘frontier’ neighborhoods they make hospitable for the rest of us,” writes The Observer. “In three to five years.” Sharon Zukin, a Brooklyn College professor and author of Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places, identifies an even further subset to keep an eye on: “Lesbians may be canaries in the urban coal mine. And lesbian moms may be an even more acute canary, maybe because they are especially concerned about the character of the school district.” And which neighborhood have the lesbians annointed now? Kensington, where one lesbian rejoiced over the “crazy amount of space” while admitting that the trade-off is that “there is nothing to do within walking distance except grocery shopping.” The article has already been met by criticism from one blog. In a post titled Bad Gentrification Writing, Ditmas Park Blog says, “This Observer story really reads like a parody of the genre, and manages to get all the details wrong in passing…We remember the days when they had editors, and a clue, at the Observer.”
Lesbians as ‘Canaries in the Urban Coal Mine’ [Observer]
Photo by bonnevilleyacht76
JPD – stereotypes are almost always true for a group of people? Are you sure you want to support that. If you are trying to say that stereotypes are true for those who hold them, perhaps. If you are trying to say that stereotypes are an accurate reflection of those who they purport to describe, even if not every individual member of that group fits, well, not really.
Even if this particular stereotype were true, how would one act upon it? It is just silly.
quote:
We’re talking about neighborhoods with people who have been getting along fine, raising their families and living their lives.
EXACTLY! the whole concept of neighborhoods being “discovered” is so barf worthy.
*rob*
Stereotype much?!
“And lesbian moms may be an even more acute canary, maybe because they are especially concerned about the character of the school district”
Who knew? All those overprotective helicopter PS mums have fake husbands.
My $0.02:
I’m a gay male and I DO NOT find this offensive, because stereotypes are almost always true for a GROUP of people, but for an INDIVIDUAL are a prejudice. Therefore making general comments about lesbians (or any group) and trends is not offensive.
This is stupid on so many levels.
I also highly resent the “urban pioneers…neighborhoods…[they] make hospitable for the rest of us.” We’re talking about neighborhoods with people who have been getting along fine, raising their families and living their lives. Not perfect neighborhoods, like there are any, but not the same as colonizing Mars, either.
What sodding arrogance.
quote:
The Observer lost all credibility when they annointed Midtown as the new “it” neighborhood.
is that that orange colored paper that constantly is rubbing one out over various celebrities and their real estate ventures?!?
*rob*
I wonder what effect this will have on Gorilla Coffee.
The Observer lost all credibility when they annointed Midtown as the new “it” neighborhood.
oops i meant to say every lesbian i ever met liked to eat AT mcdonalds.. i never actually met any inside of one.
*rob*