wholefoodsrender62011.jpg
Following a public hearing last night about Whole Foods’ application for a variance to build a supermarket that’s much larger than zoning allows on its 3rd Street and 3rd Avenue property, members of Community Board 6’s landmarks/land use committee voted in favor of supporting the store’s plans. The vote followed a hearing in which a number of community members expressed reservations about the project, particularly Whole Foods’ traffic study, which many criticized as inadequate in scope. There were also concerns aired on environmental grounds, such as whether the construction of the supermarket could theoretically hinder the Gowanus Superfund cleanup. Members of the Whole Foods team gave presentations and answered questions about the proposal, saying the 56,000-square-foot building would have a greenhouse on its roof for growing produce that would be sold inside; a cafe and community meeting room on the second floor; and, outside, feature a waterfront walkway open to the public. A few community members said the walkway would be more of a public benefit if it was larger and more park-like, while others said the aesthetics shown in the rendering above were unappealing because of the small windows (one of the Whole Foods reps said the rendering, which was handed out at the hearing, was out-of-date, and that a newer design calls for much larger windows). The committee voted to approve the variance request conditionally, asking that Whole Foods conduct another traffic study a year. They also urged the store to consider closing at 10 p.m., rather than 11 p.m., as it does in Manhattan, and to implement some sort of shuttle service. A motion was also approved to request a letter from the EPA about whether the project could negatively impact the Superfund cleanup. The full community board will vote on the variance request next week.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. By East New York on June 3, 2011 10:45 AM

    “So let me get this straight: “sustainable” merchant Whole Foods is building a store adjacent to a dangerously polluted waterway/Superfund clean-up site? Interesting.”

    One could argue (and I’d be one of them) that remediating and redeveloping an urban brownfield site in close proximity to residential communities and public transit is a lot more sustainable than doing another suburban store on what used to be a woods or farm.

  2. Haters. get out the way of progress already! You’ll bitch and moan about a bike lane but have a problem with a brand spanking new Whole Foods? Move out the way of my $5 water and my $10 loaf of bread. You all love Whole Foods and you know it. Stop hating.

  3. 4th Ave Guy is 100% correct – the store’s orientation is inappropriate for the location. The store should ‘face’ either 3rd st or 3rd Ave

    I think it is sad and typical that the Community Board didnt raise that issue but instead focused on nonsense like unappealing windows, store hours and the size of a walkway next to a currently polluted fetid canal.

  4. Back in the day when cars still had copper, steel and brass radiators you could take them to shops and have them plugged or soldered, basically “recored” at a cheaper cost than buying a new replacement. Now days they are made from aluminum and plastic.

    There was a huge radiator shop on this site for years, which begs the question where did they dispose of all that flushed antifreeze?

    The little building on the corner is actually a product placement for the preformed concrete industry back when it was new technology.

  5. 1. STARGAZER: The building on the corner currently isn’t brick. Its concrete made to look like brick. I think its really cool. And its got some historic designation, so I guess its staying.

    2. tybur6: The rendering shows traffic going in both directions on third street, which is the traffic pattern now. I think I’d like them to make Third Street one way, going east, like in Park Slope to keep people from driving west into Carroll Gardens when leaving the store. But that would create a bunch of other hassles I guess.

    3. I like that the store seems oriented towards the canal instead of hiding the canal behind the building. Good call once the canal is a friend place to hang out. But I wish one could only get into the parking lot from Third Ave. – keeping cars off Third Street.

  6. Oh come on. It will be nice to have 12 dollar artichokes and artisinal bamboo toothbrushes. And a wholesome place for our bright shiny and chronically unemployed Liberal Arts major children to work when they move home (with their similarly unemployed partners) after graduation.

    Seriously though, I am looking forward to this store, I’m really glad it was approved. Hurry up.

1 2 3