EdgyFrom this week’s New York Magazine…
Two kinds of buyers choose the less bourgeois stretches of Brooklyn: the arty crowd in Williamsburg, Greenpoint, and (at the wealthy end) Dumbo; and the families that have made a go of areas like Bedford-Stuyvesant, Red Hook, and Crown Heights. Few will do great in a downturn, but the hipsters will be better off than the rest, who are likely to find themselves with no buyers to cover those renovation loans. That’s especially true in Bed-Stuy, with too few newcomers to offset stubborn crime and weak schools. Paying $750,000 for a house here puts you well into a danger zone. Crown Heights is better off, because of better subway access and proximity to Park Slope, but its houses still seem overvalued. A far stronger bet is Red Hook: Though there’s no subway and a huge housing project, it has the critical mass to handle a downturn. Water access, plans for Ikea and Fairway, and a continuing shortage of good properties suggest a real future. Williamsburg will remain a destination for those attracted to expensive vintage clothing and Thai food set to techno, and Greenpoint, next door, is a leafy family neighborhood with loads of owner-occupied three- and four-story townhouses that many brokers believe are still a little underpriced. The first casualties will be apartments around the Lorimer L stop, which lack the nightlife draw. Anyone overpaying for a condo in the Gretsch Building should watch out, given that 10,000 new apartments with waterfront views will be on the market in a few years. As for Dumbo, it’s small enough to keep demand high: It’s there to stay, says appraiser Jeffrey Jackson.
Neighborhood Values [New York Magazine]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Thanks so very much for taking your time to create this very useful and informative site. I have learned a lot from your site. Thanks!! I think you have done an excellent job with your site. I will return in the near future.

  2. For what it’s worth, I thought this article was complete rubbish! I don’t think the reporter did any research. Very, very sloppy. Wonder where the reporter lives — could it be Williamsburg??

    The only truly blue chip nabes in Bklyn are Park Slope and Brooklyn Heights. I live in Bed Stuy and I think the way things have been going lately, it’s turning out to be a pretty solid bet. And if Bed Stuy is solid, then you can get that Clinton Hill, Fort Greene and W-burg are too.

    Historically prices in Bed Stuy have been more stable than Harlem. But I wouldn’t expect this reporter to do their research.

  3. hey brownstoner – check out recent post on Curbed –
    Williamsburg savings bank bldg had closing yesterday and we are on way to condo conversion with 216 apts…. Best views in city will soon be avail! (for those of you who can afford them of course). And I insist they keep that clock in good working order – I depend on it.

  4. Good point i think i used CH for Clinton and for Crown Heights in the same post. Sorry for this confusion, but i guess my point about Clinton was understood. By the way i went to Pratt in late 90 and we use to call it Clinton Washington. Does anybody know when Clinton hill name came? Is it a little silly to call everything hill? It is rather flat area anyway.

  5. too much of using CH – can mean Clinton Hill, Cobble Hill or Crown Hts… Just ’cause Brownstoner is moving to Clinton Hill doesn’t mean he can copyright CH for his new ‘hood.
    And for someone who has lived in Brownstone Bklyn for 30 years – I don’t consider Clinton Hill ‘edgy’ maybe the edge of it is ‘edgy’ but certainly not Clinton Avenue and environs.
    Maybe when I 1st lived in Bklyn in late 70’s – but not in well over 15 years.

1 2