Illegal Paint Job on Landmarked Block of Clinton Hill
We just got a tip that someone just started painting one of the brownstones on Grand Avenue between Gates and Putnam white this morning. (Yes, a certain blogger does live on this block.) Something tells us the Landmarks Preservation Commission didn’t sign off on this. If any readers are nearby, we’d appreciate a photo asap….

We just got a tip that someone just started painting one of the brownstones on Grand Avenue between Gates and Putnam white this morning. (Yes, a certain blogger does live on this block.) Something tells us the Landmarks Preservation Commission didn’t sign off on this. If any readers are nearby, we’d appreciate a photo asap. If anyone from LPC is reading, please get on the stick! Update 7/27: Here’s the photo from about 11:20 this morning. The address is 373 Grand Avenue. LPC confirms that there are no permits out on this.
Update 7/29: As the Daily News article reports, it turns out thatluckilythe owner was only repainting the area around the door. While we understand that some people feel it was an overreaction on our part to post about this before all the facts were known, here’s why we think it was warranted: First of all, had the painters been intending to paint the entire facade, every second counted when we got the tip (we were in fact in Dumbo, and not just across the street, when the tip came in, so popping over for a friendly chat was not an option); secondly, we were on the phone with LPC within five minutes of getting the tip, and LPC told us that (1) the owner had no permit for the painting and (2) that he had racked up, and failed to cure, several other landmark violations over the years. All these factors led us to conclude that, on balance, it was not worth taking the risk that something really destructive might happen. You know, better safe than sorry. With 20/20 hindsight, this was clearly the wrong call. Apologies to the ownerour obsession with historic brownstones may have gotten the better of us on this one.
Bottom photo by Rosier for the Daily News
There is a purpose to Landmarking. One is to protect the historic BROWNstones. This is a disgrace.
Well, if EVERYBODY on the block went with the gold and fuscia then it wouldn’t be an issue.
I would hate to live next door to that. I’m fine with sicking landmark on them. That’s the whole point with having landmark, to keep the block preserved.
Gold and fucsia horizontal stripes with blue metallic sparkles and pink faux fur trim and dingleballs (the 70s low rider kind)!!!!
No, I disagree, if the buildings are landmarked people should have to follow the rules. There are always people who think the rules don’t apply to them and they ruin the common good of the rule for everybody.
So you can’t paint your own property? Isn’t this still America???
After paying millions for it, shouldn’t they be allowed to “make it their own”??
–Aside– why isn’t painting allowed?
OMG, it’s the brownstone nerd nazi’s…leave them alone…it’s just plain boring white. leave them alone. if you’ve ever had a fight with Landmarks then you KNOW you don’t want to sic them on anyone…shame on you for posting this.
Mr B, Go kill yourself.
Gold sparkles!