Has anyone used an architect who has acted as a contractor as well? Meaning the architect draws up plans and then provides you a list of bids of sub-contractors for each project within the context of a renovation? I’m wondering if this might be more cost effective? Any downside?


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I’m on the fence about using a design/build firm. I’ve always operated under the saying that “you get what you pay for.” Yes, a design/build firm might be cheaper on the front end, but you have to be sure that they are going to manage your project rigorously. I’m also an architect and if there’s one thing I know for sure, sub-contractors have to CONSTANTLY be baby-sat. if you don’t stay on top of them, things can and will quickly spiral out of control. The next things you know, you’re dealing with costly project delays. A GC (genreal contractor) is going to be on-site everyday making sure that the subs stay on task. I’m not sure if a design/build firm will have the time to invest.

  2. I hired an architect who then project managed the construction process on my behalf. I was in contract with all the subs directly, and the architect’s project management fee was independent of the cost of the job. Worked for me. Not sure I saved money, in the end, but I fel more in control of the project and also felt it provided more continuity between what was designed and then built. I”m interested in the comment that this is illegal though-arrgh!

1 2