Ratner Wins Another Round of Yards Lawsuits
Despite voicing uneasiness with some aspects of the case, an Appeals Court panel did not find enough evidence of improper conduct on the part of the ESDC to rule in favor of the 26 neighborhood groups challenging the Atlantic Yards project on the basis of the project’s “sham” environmental review. While the court did not…

Despite voicing uneasiness with some aspects of the case, an Appeals Court panel did not find enough evidence of improper conduct on the part of the ESDC to rule in favor of the 26 neighborhood groups challenging the Atlantic Yards project on the basis of the project’s “sham” environmental review. While the court did not find legal grounds to grant the opposition’s petition, it did sympathize with its overall plight:
While we do not agree with petitioners’ legal arguments, we understand those arguments to be made largely as proxies for very legitimate concerns as to the effect of a project of such scale upon the face and social fabric of the area in which it is to be put. Those concerns, however, have relatively little to do with the project’s legality and nearly everything to do with its socio-economic and aesthetic desirability, matters upon which we may not pass. To the extent that the fate of this multi-billion dollar project remains, in an increasingly forbidding economy, a matter of social and political volition, the controlling judgments as to its merits are the province of the policy-making branches of government, not the courts.
Bruce Ratner joined Mayor Bloomberg in celebrating the victory: This project has been reviewed as thoroughly as any in the city and not it is time to put these cases behind us and get to work, he said. An appeal is planned, notes Atlantic Yards Report, though there is a chance that the Court of Appeals could decide not to hear it.
Appellate Court, Despite Some Misgivings, Dismisses EIS Case [AY Report]
Ratner Wins a Big Yards Case [Brooklyn Paper]
Legal Victory for Atlantic Yards Developer [NY Times]
The losing streak continues. Not surprising, given the poorly-qualified “community organizers” behind the opposition.
Steve right on. I remember the original proposals and all the furor, and how people would say at Freddy’s “This bar is going to close in about 6 months.”
Meanwhile, the MTA is in complete budget crisis, handing us service cuts and fare increases … hmmm … i wonder if that $100 million dollars they passed up on for this site might have helped out their current situation?
I think the sheer size of AY and its design became the real issue. And calling for eminent domain. I would love to see something great in that area and I agree with ENY that the 2 neighborhoods were certainly not unified. But the big issue is how AY will affect the area. I am not thrilled that public streets will be closed down and set within the project. I don’t think that’s right.
I don’t think AY even begins to address how the arena and the massive housing projects will affect infrastructure and traffic in the area and I think it is morally and ethically wrong to loosen the definition of eminent domain to suit a private developer. Ratner has finessed every advantage to himself while trying to make us beleive it will benefit all of us. I’m not that blind, thanks. And brokeland is right. It was a political decision, not a legal one (we’re taking parameters, not legality on this point).
there is plenty of room in the law for these judges to have decided with the plaintiffs. and plenty of room to decide for the state.
they made a political decision, not a legal decision.
Biff – The Chicken speaks for me on this.
I agree with ENY!! Atlantic yard was disneyland before ratner showed up. We should leave it like it is so everyone can enjoy this beatifull area and close knit community. Right!!!!
I agree with ENY!! Atlantic yard was disneyland before ratner showed up. We should leave it like it is so everyone can enjoy this beatufill area and close knit community. Right!!!!
Ahhh — a D-O-N-E D-E-A-L reference.
Maybe some of you kids can remember how this was a D-O-N-E D E-A-L back in 2005.
Good times, good times…