Inside Third & Bond: Week 25
At the risk of alienating our readers with more narcoleptic-inducing offering plan analysis, we thought we’d discuss 4 important decisions we made in our last offering plan for J Condo to determine how we are going to create the next condominium structure for Third & Bond. To paraphrase Senator Obama & Governor Patrick, offering plan…

At the risk of alienating our readers with more narcoleptic-inducing offering plan analysis, we thought we’d discuss 4 important decisions we made in our last offering plan for J Condo to determine how we are going to create the next condominium structure for Third & Bond. To paraphrase Senator Obama & Governor Patrick, offering plan language is not just words; they have meaning long after we’ve completed construction and moved on to our next project. For example…
Flip Tax: We felt strongly when creating J Condo that there should be a 1% flip tax on all resales, i.e., sellers pay 1% of their sales price to the condo. Our thinking at the time was that in a large building with a lot of turn-over, especially early on, the building reserve fund would capture a significant amount of revenue. Let’s assume there’s an average annual 10% turnover on 267 units with an average sale price of $1 million. That’s annual flip tax revenue for the condo of $267K. After 5 years, there could be more than $1 million in the reserve fund for a new building, which establishes the condo with a very strong financial foundation. Our J Condo brokers warned us that the flip tax requirement could chill the market, discourage investors, etc. Four years later, what have we learned? No one brought it up or told us they didn’t buy at J because of the flip tax. Units are already being resold, earning serious revenue for the building. So far so good.
Third & Bond might also see a flip tax.
Board Control by Sponsor: Sponsors are allowed by law to control the condo board for up to 5 years. We’ve seen sponsors choose this alternative in order to ensure that they can control the decisions of the building. We think that strategy has a downside: residents will continue to feel disenfranchised, thinking of the sponsor as more of a landlord. If the sponsor is in total control, then shouldn’t the sponsor fix every problem like a landlord would? However, cut the umbilical cord too soon and let residents control the board from day 1, and other problems can ensue. We’ve heard of new management companies and resident-controlled boards who’ve done a bad job of maintaining the new (and often complicated) building systems that have been installed. If the HVAC system, for instance, gets screwed up, there’s lots of finger pointing exchanged (if not lawsuits) between sponsors and condos. So we tend to take the middle ground. At J Condo, we’re controlling the board for 2 years while still having resident board members elected in those first two years, in order to begin the transfer process. At the Marais in West Chelsea, we gave up control of the board immediately, but hired our management company for the first 3 years.
Third & Bond will likely have a similar transition of power.
Assignments/Resales: Our contracts don’t allow buyers in contract to flip or assign their contract to anyone else. Most New York developers have this prohibition, thus limiting the speculative environments one hears about in Florida for example. We also don’t allow buyers to advertise their resale while they’re still in contract, they have to wait until they’ve closed. Other more onerous contracts we’ve seen don’t allow buyers to advertise the resale of their units for up to a year after closing! Why? They don’t want buyers competing with their ongoing sales process.
Third & Bond we’ll have to consider the market just before we put in the offering plan but probably we’ll keep it the same as at J.
Warranty: There are no long-term warranty obligations required of any sponsor, and all sponsors must disclose what they will or will not warranty. For instance, as long as a Sponsor discloses in the Special Risks, you’re taking this dump as-is, I’m not warrantying nothin’, and there’s a good chance the roof might begin to leak in 3 years, prospective buyers would have a hard time complaining about construction problems. We offer a 1 year warranty on all labor and materials and provide longer term 3rd party warranties for the roof, kitchen appliances, and certain HVAC equipment. We try to stick to this 1 year warranty, otherwise buyers will be calling for years when there’s a problem with their toilet, A/C, flooring, etc. We’ve heard of sponsors who continue to voluntarily fix things 4-5 years down the line, and then they’re unable to extricate themselves from these responsibilities since they never drew a line in the sand. If any buyer would ask us about it, we would point out that if they buy the co-op down the block, they’re buying everything as-is, and that one year should be enough to identify problems in an apartment that might fall under the Sponsor’s responsibility.
After a year, if buyers need a replacement part, there’s always Brooklyn Flea…
Inside Third & Bond: Week 24 [Brownstoner]
Inside Third & Bond: Week 23 [Brownstoner]
Inside Third & Bond: Week 22 [Brownstoner]
Inside Third & Bond: Week 21 [Brownstoner]
From our lawyers: This is not an offering. No offering can be made until an offering plan is filed with the Department of Law of the State of New York.”
I find the series enlightening. Some not so interesting – and then I don’t read it. But please continue.
Ignore the dozen or so people that always comment on this blog that are negative about every thing, house, neighborhood, business, Brownstoner.com, etc, etc, etc. They are a sad sad lot.
Seems like blatant advertising of condos that do not have an offering plan approved, condos on a toxic site no less.
Will be worth zero once…
I appreciate this report. It’s very detailed and I enjoy Alison’s writing style and candidness. he is taking us through the design phase of the project, too.
For most developments there’s a lengthly planning perior prior to getting into the ground. Additionally Alison has detained the issues that have slowed the process.
Quit your carping!
Worst. Thread. Ever
12:20, I think your post was meant to top be on the 93 Nevins thread (unless 3rd & Bond has gone from substructure to finishes in the blink of an eye)
I read this regularly and I thank you for these posts. I know nothing about development so this is a real education for me. This post came with a warning label that it might be boring, so why the complaints?
Is this project taking longer than expected? If so, why?
I live on the block and I am kind of shocked on how long this is taking. Also it appears that some of the sheet rock they are using has been exposed to rain on multiple occasions.
I thought they were townhouses, not condos?
Kind of a turnoff to buy a townhouse that is subject to a condo board.