skyline
July 5, 2005, NY Times — The massive building plan surrounding a new Nets arena east of Downtown Brooklyn will include a ridge of a half-dozen skyscrapers as high as 60 stories sweeping down Atlantic Avenue, along with four towers circling the basketball arena, according to new designs completed by the developer Bruce C. Ratner and the architect Frank Gehry. The project, the largest proposed outside Manhattan in decades, would include much more housing than originally announced in 2003, growing to about 6,000 units from 4,500, according to a plan made available to The New York Times. But the real impact would be in the size and density of the buildings, which are taller and bulkier than once envisioned. With 17 buildings, many of them soaring 40 to 50 stories, the project would forever transform the borough and its often-intimate landscape, creating a dense urban skyline reminiscent of Houston or Dallas. The project would be built in phases, starting with the blocks around the arena, then the apartment complexes along Dean Street at the Vanderbilt Avenue end, and finally the northern stretch of housing along Atlantic Avenue. The arena is planned to open for the 2008-9 basketball season, said James P. Stuckey, an executive vice president at Forest City Ratner Companies, with the entire project completed as soon as 2011. The project will come before the Metropolitan Transportation Authority tomorrow as Mr. Ratner makes a formal proposal to buy and develop the Atlantic Avenue railyards.

Comment: We have to admit that these renderings are pretty exciting. Over the past several months, as the debate over the project has intensified, we found our sympathies leaning towards the anti-Ratner camp. We’re extremely uncomfortable with the concept of eminent domain and if our brownstone happened to be directly affected by the plan we’re sure we wouldn’t be pleased. But it’s hard to look at Gehry’s renderings and not get swept up. We couldn’t give a rat’s ass about having a local basketball team, but being at the center of arguably the most significant urban development effort in a generation (or more) is starting to outweigh our earlier reservations. Let’s hope that it’s more than a giant P.R. stunt to close the deal. Enough people’s lives are being uprooted that this better end up being something special. From the looks of it, it just may be.

Instant Skyline Added to Brooklyn Arena Plan [NY Times]
An Appraisal [NY Times]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Glad I’m far enough away to avoid living in the shadows of Ratnerville. Do you think permanent darkness will affect propety values in FG or PH?

    After watching the fireworks from a 6th floor roof last night, I gained an even deeper appreciation for low-rise development in the cozy confines of Brooklyn.

    That rendering is some ugly sh*t. I’ve seen Bilbao and Bard, but I would hate to have a Ghery in my backyard…

  2. Metrotech, as one critic put it, was built with its back turned on the neighborhood. It is unfriendly and its public spaces are well guarded but underused. This new project seems to be heading in the same direction. It would be nice if the new development were integrated into the surrounding areas and the public spaces were not just open, but inviting by design. Metrotech and Atlantic Center (before the facelift) seemed to be about security and considering the surrounding neighbors as threats – the invitation was to stay out, not to come in. I hope the design of this project is more neighborly.

  3. Oh, believe us, our optimism is EXTREMELY cautious at this point. But other than the State Street townhouses, we can’t think of a single new building in Brooklyn that’s even moderately attractive. Gehry’s not our favorite, but we’d prefer his stuff, as the previous poster points out, over the crap that is otherwise getting constructed in the borough right now.

  4. i’m excited about the developement of downtown Brooklyn… but I can’t help being pesimistic about the outcome of this project. New development makes me so sad… These plans don’t look like an exciting skyline to me, they look like a bunch of boxes (I especially dislike the skewed boxes). The Manhattan skyline is so beautiful, I love the grand old buildings with all their detail. I’m definitely not anti all new architecture, so I’m still cautously hopefull about this…

  5. I’m with the Stoner on this one. I think these designs are a heck of a lot better than having Scarano et al. gradually fill in Atlantic Avenue with el cheapo junk over the next decade.

1 6 7 8