Piece of Historic Wallabout Threatened by Developers
The group of four large commercial properties that take up the entire western side of Hall Street (at left in the bottom photo) between Flushing and Park Avenues in Wallabouttwo of which (30 Hall and 12 Hall, pictured at top) are of architectural and historic significancequietly changed hands last December for $10 million. The new…

The group of four large commercial properties that take up the entire western side of Hall Street (at left in the bottom photo) between Flushing and Park Avenues in Wallabouttwo of which (30 Hall and 12 Hall, pictured at top) are of architectural and historic significancequietly changed hands last December for $10 million. The new buyers, the team behind HK Management that includes Harry Kotowitz, Howie Klaus and Jeffrey Sitt, have been taking pains to keep a low profile as they seek the city’s complicity in their plot to destroy a piece of Wallabout history.
Architectural historian and Columbia prof Andrew Dolkart discussed the buildings in his 2005 survey of the Wallabout area:
The buildings that survive on the west side of Hall Street were erected by two wholesale grocery businesses. E. Le Grand Beers, who also erected buildings on the east side of Washington Avenue, commissioned the large, seven-story, brick (later stuccoed over), cold storage warehouse at 30-38 Hall Street from George Chappell in 1898. This building was extended to the north (Nos. 24-28) in 1918. Charles Hutwelker commissioned two cold storage buildings to the north, both designed by C. E. Huntley & Co. Hutwelker was a meat packer who went into business in Brooklyn in 1884. The Hall Street warehouses were initially occupied by the Charles Hutwelker Beef Export Company. No. 14-16 was designed in 1909 and No. 18-22 in 1919. These buildings could be included within a Wallabout Industrial Historic District.
As some of you may be aware, earlier in the 20th century, the city’s biggest open market used to be held across Flushing Avenue from these buildings in what’s now the Navy Yard; as a result, the large buildings in the immediate area were home to many of the city’s biggest grocery companies. In addition, as was pointed out to us by one of the preservationists working on the Wallabout Historic District application, the large awning (photo on the jump) that runs along the entire front of 55 Washington and 30 Hall, is also significant. These two buildings also sit directly across the street from the complex of reinforced-concrete buildings built for the Mergenthaler Linotype company in the earlt part of the 20th century. According to Dolkart, “The entire complex should be designated as a New York City landmark as soon as possible in order to preserve the original features of this architecturally and historically significant complex.”
The ability of these buildings to be included in the Wallabout Historic District (which is still pushing to get in front of LPC) is now threatened by the recent assumption of ownership by HK Management, whose recent track record includes snubbing Dumbo preservationists and pulling the rug out from underneath buyers at 99 Gold Street. HK has already been taking the temperature of local politicians to see if they’d support an application to the BSA to tear down all the buildings to build new residential. What’s interesting is that the four properties (2, 12, 30 and 40 Hall Street) are already overbuilt: Collectively they have about 200,000 square feet of interior space on about 70,000 square feet of lot space, well in excess of the 2 FAR for the area.
If the city does ultimately consider granting a variance for residential in this case, we sincerely hope it will look to the current Domino Sugar Factory situation as a model and insist on the preservation and integration of the buildings at 12 and 30 Hall into any kind of a proposal by the developers. If you have any strong feelings about the future of these buildings or what kind of neighbors these developers are likely to make, we’d encourage you to drop an email to Council Member Letitia James at james@council.nyc.ny.us. Maybe the spectre of this destruction will be enough to get Tierney et al to focus a little harder on designating the Wallabout Historic District. We do hear that Tierney’s planning a tour of the area at some point this summer.
Wallabout Cultural Resource Survey [Myrtle Avenue] GMAP P*Shark DOB
“Cold storage warehouses are problematic to convert”
Developers of several Chicago projects, including those linked below, seem to find the process worthwhile.
http://www.emporis.com/en/wm/bu/?id=dearborntower-chicago-il-usa
http://newwestrealty.com/c/p/?cid=12&pt=4
Sorry 11:52, if you walked through SoHo or Tribeca twenty years ago, like I did (many times) you would have seen stunning architecture, beautiful detail, gem after gem after gem.
Nothing like Hall Street.
More like Venice, which is itself nothing like Hall Street.
Let’s use a little bit of common sense here. Not all old buildings are equally important or equally worth saving.
wwib,
i promise to work on my schtick if you promise to work on your writing. it pains me to read your posts.
am i the only one who finds wwib’s prose convoluted and confusing?
brah, are you on crystal meth or something? jeesh!
Why would anyone want to tear down any one of these buildings? They are built better than anything that one of these so called developers would put up. I lived in a building developed by HK Realty and it had more problems than I could count. HK’s idea of quality construction is to skimp on the basics of construction like wood, nails, insulation, tar paper etc. For example my former apartment in DUMBO was in a redeveloped building that had been botched by HK. Brand new roof leaked, no insulation in floor of apartment located over an open air garage, warped wood floors because of moisture from open air garage, sliding glass door to patio was supported by 6 or 7 pieces of scrap sheet rock resulting in warped door. The list could go on but you all get the picture. Quality is not this developers strong suit. I mean this guy saves money on the cheap stuff, the basics of building and it’s the same for people like Guttman. Ignore the laws and do whatever it takes to make a dime.
Yeah great idea to give these developers whatever they want without question. If they were building something that actually mattered or was made with quality in mind maybe they would deserve more respect but the simple fact is they don’t.
Think about how Brooklyn is developed. Should it be the shoddy crap that’s been going up all over the borough or looking at some of the buildings we already have and reusing them. I think the latter.
Don’t mess with me, 11:16, or I’ll have the ghosts of a million tenement rats run up and down your pantslegs.
Mr. B. and I happen to agree on this. I disagree with him on other things, it’s his blog, I’m just glad to be able to put in my $.02. I’m just more comfortable living in his city than in the city created by someone like 11:03.
Oh boy, the CG troll is back!
Sorry dude, east of Flatbush is where all of the value and upside lies. AY will only enhance our property values moving foward. Get a life!
11:24, check out the new “snubbing” link (the original one was a cut-and-paste error). How do we know they been “taking the temperature”? We made some calls. Can’t people see how beautiful those windows and the original brick facade are, especially at #30? As for the structure, at Domino there were similar issues and they are finding ways to upgrade the structure to preserve the facades. Where there’s a will there’s a way. It just takes a little vision.
You only have to walk down Hall St & in the valley btween the old majestic hall st structures u quickly r embraced by the cloudy mist of the Brooklyn gritty past. U neednt smoke herb or b named prsrvtionista 2 take this trip. YEA LPC.
To be clear, this is old in Venice:
http://home.nyc.rr.com/seyr/imgs/Venice2007.jpg