nets-arena-0509.jpgBruce Ratner wasted no time announcing his intention to plow ahead with the construction of the Atlantic Yards Arena in the wake of a Court of Appeals ruling in his favor. “This is really the last hurdle that we have and now we can do what our company does best and build an arena and houses,” said Ratner on Friday, hours after the Appellate Division of State Supreme Court rejected Goldstein et al’s position that the state improperly used eminent domain to seize properties from nine owners who did not want to sell. If Ratner does indeed move ahead with plans to build, the arena the public gets may be substantially different than the glitzy renderings from starchitect Frank Gehry that were used to build public support for the project early on: Ratner has already trimmed the budget for the project by 20 percent and has admitted that he may not use Gehry’s design at all. And Ratner can’t get going quite yet. The plaintiffs have vowed to appeal to the Court of Appeals (the highest court in the state) and there’s still pending litigation surrounding the state’s environmental impact study. “At a minimum, if we lose every single thing imaginable, it’s still going to take them four to six months,” said attorney Matthew Brinckerhoff. The delay is particularly important because Forest City Ratner has only until the end of the year to secure its tax-exempt financing for the arena from the state.
Eminent Domain Case is Dismissed Unanimously [AY Report]
Court Rebuffs Yards Opponents as Legal Options Narrow [NY Observer]
Ruling Puts Ratner Closer to Nets’ Arena [Newsday]
Appeals Court Dismisses Suit Against Atlantic Yards [NY Times]
Ruling Could put Atlantic Yards Project Back on Track [NY Daily News]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. BTW, the Dodgers were never actually in PLG. Even though the media talked about Ebbets Field being in Flatbush, it was in Crown Heights. However, I’m told, when I’ve talked to people who lived here prior to 1957, that it was close enough to hear the cheering.

  2. “If it wasn’t for Ratner’s proposal we wouldn’t be discussing development at this site at all.”

    Wrong. If it weren’t for Ratner’s proposal development at “this site” would be under way.

  3. If it wasn’t for Ratner’s proposal we wouldn’t be discussing development at this site at all. All the “wouldn’t that be nice” concepts make for nice conversation but they are pure (and as you admit in your post) theory. The arena will go up, the buildings will follow, and the lot of you will move onto something else stylish to ignorantly debate.

  4. If Ratner doesn’t break ground by October, he loses his financing and it would be hard to get new financing in today’s climate. The arena would be dead; no Brooklyn Nets. So the opponents do not have to “win” in court, they just have to delay him for five more months.

    There will be a development of some kind one day on the AY site, hopefully it is better than what FCR proposed. I disagree that the neighborhood is blighted; I lived right across from the AY site on Dean St for a few months and I thought the neighborhood was great. If Bloomberg had some vision for the city, we could see something there that would capitalize on what exists and yet also be profitable for a developer.

  5. Johnny – do you just cut and paste the same line you read somewhere in every AY thread? tell me – how much tax revenue did the yards produce last year, last 5 years, 10 years?

    Bob – i’m surprised to see you so against this. You should talk to some people who lived in your hood during and following the Dodger era. The Dodgers leaving PLG killed that area.

    15 years from now the Johnnys of this topic will be hiding.

1 2 3 5