school-out-1208.jpg
“Carroll Gardens is getting whiter! Williamsburg is getting smarter! And the Park Slope baby boom is real!” That’s the Brooklyn Paper‘s three exclamation point recap of the census data released yesterday; we’re still a very diverse borough, but the make-up has shifted. Richer, whiter folks have displaced minority families since 2000 in neighborhoods west of Prospect Park, from the Slope to Red Hook, which “had the biggest jump in median household income — 23 percent, to $77,784 — partly because nearly a fifth of black and Hispanic families, who earn half as much as their white counterparts, left during the seven-year period.” Carroll Gardens, Park Slope and Cobble Hill have indeed had baby booms &#8212 “The number of children under-5 shot up 35 percent in the area” &#8212 and around 80 percent more college graduates have flocked to Williamsburg than lived there in 2000. Neighborhoods further out in Brooklyn grew more diverse, with white populations shrinking slightly in Bay Ridge, Dyker Heights and Bensonhurst, and the Asian population increasing by 34 percent. The Brooklyn Eagle looked at the number of “now married” and “never married” folks (roughly the same size), and found that two-parent families are most common, followed by female-headed families. “Ninety-one percent of those surveyed lived in the same house or apartment they lived in a year ago,” they write, signaling that perhaps folks are moving less, or the influx of folks from other boroughs and states is slowing. And the highest concentration of rents fall between $750 and $1,500; must still be plenty of rent stabilized pads out there.
Census ‘Community Survey’ Reveals Facts About Brooklyn [Brooklyn Eagle]
Making Census of Brooklyn [Brooklyn Paper]
Photo by heimdalsgata.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. I’m always amused when someone uses the adjective “whiter” If one assumes that the contrast is black, does that include Asians and brown or olive skinned latinos who essentially are “whiter” than black folk?

    And not all “whier” folk are richer, white trash being a case in point.

    14 shopping days until Christmas!!!

  2. Why is it that when it comes to income Hispanics and Blacks almost ALWAYS positioned as a homogeneous group made up of primarily lower income people while Whites are a “high” income? Come on, it’s 2008!!!
    The Census article from which the information was extrapolated ALSO stated that the average HH income level in Bed-Stuy increased. Well, the assumption would be that the White hipsters who are MOSTLY RENTING in Bed-Stuy are driving the increase. However, most of that increase is being driven by Black professionals who are moving back to the neighborhood and renovating the beautiful brownstones. The White hipsters in Bed-Stuy are broke!! If they had money the’d chose to live elsewhere.

  3. “Richer, whiter folks have displaced minority families…”

    um, or, minorities have greatly benefited by taking advantage of the market and selling their houses at huge profits, and those that stayed saw an imporovement in neighborhood safety and amenities.

    (my comment might be good for a few more reactions to get to that 200 posts)

1 16 17 18 19 20