Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North
Photo via Property Shark

Two developers, eager to capitalize on a building boom, a robust economy, and a hot neighborhood, take a chance to build what they feel will be hugely successful and lucrative housing.

But while everything seems to be in their favor, something happens, and the bottom falls out and bankruptcy looms. Will they succeed? Will the housing be built?

More importantly, will it sell? What happens? Here on Brownstoner, we read about these situations every day, it seems. But this tale is not about Williamsburg or Park Slope in 2008. It’s about the St. Marks District, now called Crown Heights North, and the year is 1898.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North
1902 Photo via Brooklyn Eagle

At the end of the 19th century, the St. Marks District was one of the most fashionable areas of Brooklyn. As the mansions of the rich were going up on St. Marks Avenue, and adjacent streets, new blocks of more modest housing was going up all around the area.

Most of this was speculative housing, and the developers of yesterday were doing much of what today’s developers are doing trying to build in a popular neighborhood for those who could afford it. Sometimes this involved taking an innovative approach with a marketing hook.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North

In this case, developing an exclusive enclave of two short blocks tucked in between two popular streets, and in between two busy avenues, all a block or two from a beautiful new park.

Hampton Place and Virginia Place are are parallel to each other, and to busy Albany and Kingston Avenues. The blocks in question are between Park and Sterling Places. By the 1890’s, the street grid had been laid out, but Hampton and Virginia Place were not included.

The land was originally owned by Ellis G. Porter, who traded it to a Howard R. Deacon for an extensive hotel property in Virginia Beach, Va., along with a building loan of $225,000.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North

This may be where the Virginia and Hampton names originated. Deacon sold the land to fellow Philadelphians, Charles C. Haines and Hames A. Campbell, who were experienced developers in that city. Deacon also took back a mortgage for $20K. The first thing Haines and Campbell did was to cut through the property and lay out Hampton and Virginia Places.

The idea was to create an exclusive enclave, tucked away from the city grid. The design of the houses would be a unique mixture of fifty houses, 23 three story and basement houses, along with 28 two story and basement homes, all designed by the same architect, all joining harmoniously in a two block cohesive unit.

Each block would contain fourteen houses, two three-story houses on each corner, and two in the center of the block, with the west side of Hampton Place only having eight houses. Construction started and by mid-year, 1900, the houses were enclosed and some had their exterior trim. Then the trouble started.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North

Charles Haines began advertising the unfinished houses for sale in groups in ads in the Brooklyn Eagle, in July of 1899, offering 12 two story houses on Virginia place for $78k, 8 on Hampton Place for $68K, and 16 houses on both streets for $114K. There must have been no takers.

In November of 1900, Howard Deacon filed suit against Haines and Campbell, alleging that they had defaulted in their interest payments, and were unable to finish the project.

Deacon demanded his $20K be paid immediately. In court, it was learned that Haines and Campbell had a builder’s loan of $225K, of which $185,835 had been advanced, and liens of $21,564.92, plus $328.33 were drawn on the properties, along with taxes and expenses of $2,342.79.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North
1900 Photo via Brooklyn Eagle

Needless to say, they didn’t have it, and the courts foreclosed. A month later, the properties were auctioned, and sold back to Howard Deacon for $191,000. In 1902, the Hampton-Virginia development is again in the news,the Eagle announcing that the houses were almost done.

The company of record is the South Gate Building Company. I could not ascertain if this was Deacon’s business, or if he had sold it, or partnered in order to finish.

The article, published in March, 1902, is accompanied by a photograph showing the new row of houses, with unfinished streets and sidewalks. The article says that, the 50 houses on Virginia and Hampton Place in the St. Marks section, upon which work was long delayed, are practically completed.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North
1899 Photo via Brooklyn Eagle

The streets are not yet laid, but they will be asphalted and curbed within a few weeks. These houses, built on a street one block long, make a very exclusive neighborhood and their architectural style add to the beauty of the locality. The South Gate Building Company is the contractor who finished the houses.

Ads for the houses start to appear in the Eagle in April, offering the smaller two stories plus basement houses for rent starting at $45/month, or for sale at reasonable terms.

On May 10th, the Eagle announced that the first house had been sold to a Mr. Arthur S.R. Smith for $6,500, and that the streets and sidewalks were being laid.

Brooklyn History -- Crown Heights North
Photo via Google Maps

Soon after, South Gate recorded a sale to Oscar Fichenbaum with a mortgage for $5.5K, a sale to Elizabeth M. Engelhardt for $6,750, 3 properties to Phillip Jung for $25,500, and that same year, Jung resold one house to William Foster, which carried a mortgage of $4,000. More were to follow, and eventually sell out. Hampton and Virginia Places were finally finished.

Today, the streets remain an isolated enclave, quiet and peaceful. The houses are all Renaissance Revival in design, made of gold or red brick with white limestone trim, featuring swags, garlands, columns and other classical details. Over the years, some have fared better than others, but the streets remain remarkably intact, especially Hampton Place.

The interiors of the houses reflect their Renaissance Revival/Edwardian-era details: fine oak parquet floors, oak trim in restrained and simpler woodwork and fireplace surrounds, classical columns as parlor dividers, and very simple stained glass.

Many have been owned for generations by the same families, and new owners have also found these homes to be quite desirable and have put their stamp on them, with both period restorations and modern gut rehabs.

This area also boasts one of the strongest block associations in Crown Heights North, advocating for historic district designation, as well as improvements to nearby Brower Park.

Charles Haines and Hames Campbell may not have been able to finish their grand project, but over one hundred years later, their exclusive enclave still stands as a testament to some bad business practices, but also some excellent real estate development planning.

[Photos by Suzanne Spellen]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. Yeah, you’d think that, Big Jugs, when all of your comments about this neighborhood have been consistantly negative.

    Yes, we have a rich, in all meanings of the word, past. But we also have a history of stability, preservation and quiet positive growth, helping to make this neighborhood the gem it is. I don’t know what neighborhood you are talking about, but Crown Heights North only has one housing project anywhere near where I’m talking about, and the urban problems we have no worse than other similar neighborhoods, either. I hardly think the prospect of cheap housing would entice people from Park Slope and elsewhere if their lives were in danger. They come and stay because they realize it’s a beautiful neighborhood, and they choose to see for themselves, and not believe the negativity from people like you. Not a perfect place, by any means, but not the hellhole you’d like to make it either.

  2. Wow, these posts show just how far Crown Heights has fallen during the past century. From “one of the most fashionable areas of Brooklyn” to housing projects, poverty, shootings, muggings, and brownstone owners who moved there only because they couldn’t afford Park Slope of Brooklyn Heights.

  3. Oh wow, lookie here! Brilliant work, Monnie Morry.

    Great catch, Petebklyn. Awfully close to 10x! And that was just the ASKING rent.

    So, using the averages from when “trouble started” to the eventual sales, the market crashed about -35% from peak at that point. And then probably crashed further towards sell-out. Interesting. Must be attributed to the depression of the 1890’s.

    The more things change…

    ***Bid half off peak comps***

  4. Save the Slope, I don’t know. I’m going to have to go down to the DOB to check that one out. The architect’s name was not mentioned in any of the Eagle articles I referenced for this piece, and since it’s not in an HD, no one else did the work for me either. I’ll post when I do find out. I’m curious, as well.

    Donald, yes, will email you!

  5. I just love this article. Thank you so much, Montrose. I love the analogies to the present. Plus we have info about how much the houses cost, and we know the precise dates so we can see when this style was built.

  6. Great feature! I’ve seen two of these houses on the Crown Heights North house tours. Both very charming, renovated with real flair, and quite different from each other. As I recall, one (on the east side of the street) is owned by two sisters and includes a fabulous 1940s restored vintage stove in the kitchen. The other (on the west side) is owned by a young Brit who is a decorative painter and had done some amazing finishes to cabinets, staircase etc.