Senator Checks In On Clinton Hill Drug Trade
We just received a copy of Senator Velmanette Montgomery’s letter to 88th Precint head John Cosgrove about the migration of the drug activity from Grand Avenue to Cambridge following the barricading of Grand this summer: September 28, 2006 Deputy Inspector John Cosgrove 88th Precinct 298 Classon Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11205 Re: Illegal Drug Activity, Fulton…
We just received a copy of Senator Velmanette Montgomery’s letter to 88th Precint head John Cosgrove about the migration of the drug activity from Grand Avenue to Cambridge following the barricading of Grand this summer:
September 28, 2006
Deputy Inspector John Cosgrove
88th Precinct
298 Classon Avenue
Brooklyn, NY 11205
Re: Illegal Drug Activity, Fulton Street, Washington/Classon Avenues
Dear Deputy Inspector John Cosgrove:
I am writing to you on behalf of my constituents who reside in and around the above area in my district. The complaints are about the selling of drugs and loitering.
I am requesting that something be done about the illegal drug selling in the above area, and the loitering in front of 134 and 132 Cambridge Place by people who are not residents of that block.
I would like to know what is being done about this problem and after the closing of Grand Avenue the investigation has not ventured in surrounding areas (sic). The illegal drug activity has moved to other places such as Downing Street and Cambridge Place. I am awaiting a response to this situation.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
Senator Velmanette Montgomery
18th Senate District
Granted this was written a couple of months ago, but as far as we can tell, the drug dealing has resumed on Grand Avenue again as well. Is it still happening on Cambridge and Downing too? Update: For Cosgrove’s response, continue reading below.
Turning Up The Pressure on Grand and Putnam [Brownstoner]
Here’s what Cosgrove had to say in response:
October 25th, 2006
In regards to: Drug Activity v/o Downing St & Cambridge Pl.
Dear Hon. Senator Velmanette Montgomery,
Thank you for taking the time to bring this consituent matter to my attention. I am very concerned about the collateral effects of our initiative in the vicinity of Downing Street and Cambridge Place.
I have researched the specific locations you complained of; buildings 132 & 134 Cambridge Place. For the period of July 1st through October 14th, 2006 there were a total of three (3) 911 calls for service at 132 Cambridge Place. Of these two were for domestic matters. At 134 Cambridge Place there were zero calls for service.
It troubles me that our constituents feel their quality of life has been adversely impacted by our summer initiative at the intersection of Putnam and Grand Avenues. I would encourage them to utilize the “911” and “311” systems top report the violations they are observing. This way the New York City Police Department can do something aboutthe violations in “real time”.
I will continue to monitor this matter for future discussion.
Sincerely,
Deputy Inspector John Cosgrove
Commanding Officer, 88th Precinct
As someone who has lived in Clinton Hill for the last decade, I can confirm that the area has indeed changed, sometimes for the best, sometimes for less than the best. The drug dealing, at least in the part of Clinton Hill where I live, was only slightly worse ten years ago than it is today.
It’s important, I think, for people to realize that it’s not just the cops’ or the politicians’ or the residents’ fault the drug problem hasn’t been remedied: IT’S EVERYONE’S FAULT. Are cops in collusion with the dealers who have been busted selling dope on the same corners for years? Without a doubt. Are the politicians aware of the problem but simply failing to act unless its serves their election year agendas? Without a doubt. Do the people who fail to stand up to the well known dealers and regular customers WITHIN THE COMMUNITY only emboldening both groups? Without a doubt.
In my opinion, the cops and politicians should be removed from any useful discussions regarding how the drug problem is handled. Both are, at very best, simple stop-gap measures provided when it serves the CITY’S best interests, not its RESIDENTS. How many times do people need to have this sad truism thrown in their faces before they finally start to recognize it as fact?
If the people who live in Clinton Hill are to be serious about the biggest problem Clinton Hill faces, its residents are going to have to finally step up to the plate and say enough is enough. The sad part is, most of them, either because they’re too scared or afraid of offending someone or dont want to ruin longtime *friendships* or simply because they are 100% complicent, never will.
I say sad because unless the people who live here now do something to preserve and even save their neighborhood, they will lose it. Completely. Some might argue that the current residents are destined to lose their place in the city through gentrification anyway, so why try? And it’s just that type of attitude that got those same people where they are today. It’s time to put up or shut up, or deal with the consequences. If the convictions are sincere, the choice of action should be more than crystal clear.
Cosgrove just joined a long line of 88th Captains who got promoted. Doesn’t change the fact that it’s like pulling teeth to get a complaint number out of our precinct – and unless you get one, you can be fairly sure there hasn’t been any record of your complaint added to their stats. And better stats mean more promotions. One local owner of a commercial establishment was recently held up in his store, and called the 88th as soon as the robber departed. After trying repeatedly to get a complaint number from the 88th and being fobbed off, he finally called Tish James’ office and they got one for him.
just for the record, cosgrove got promoted to deputy inspector for the job he did as commanding officer of the 88th precinct and was reassigned a couple weeks ago to a tougher precinct, which wouldn’t happen if the department didn’t think he had done a good job in his last post. there are jobs in the department for good administrators that just aren’t that good at reducing crime. cosgrove didn’t get one of those.
Don’t like drugs?
Fine.
Don’t use them.
Don’t like the sale of drugs?
Fine.
Don’t buy/sell them.
Actually I meant that the NYPD and the Officer should be held accountable (just not criminally)
6:48 AM – you are 100% correct except for the depraved part – depraved is a much, much, much higher standard then reckless (and please dont all say how it was ‘depraved’ – I am talking about the NYS LEGAL definition, not the dictionary definition).
All that being said with the rhetoric coming from Charles Barron and (very few) others, I worry that should the officers be (criminally) exonorated there will be non-passive action taken.
Again I am not saying that the NYPD or even these Officers should be held accountable for their actions (and failures in training and supervision) only that CRIMINAL responsibility seems inappropriate (unless other facts become apparent) and given that this post is an example where us citizens are calling for the police to enter potentially dangerous situations (drug dealing) where the possibility of deadly mistakes are easy, we should at least not call for our Police to be subject to a punishment that other professions are not (criminal sanctions) unless they arte clearly warranted.
Sorry, that should be 11:33PM
I don’t know if there’s such a thing as The Bullshit Post of the Year award. However, if there is, then the post at 11:33AM should win it.
With respect to the police shooting in Queens, I think that even though the incident could be categorized as (1) an accident; (2) an error in judgment; (3) negligent homicide; or (4) depraved indifference to human life, an innocent person did in fact die as a result of poorly trained law enforcement. And to this end, the officers involved, the NYPD and the City must be held accountable. Realistically, there will be massive media attention on this case but in the end the officers, unjustly or not, will be exonerated. The family, however, will most likely win a multi-million dollar wrongful death suit in civil court and get some form of justice in this manner.
As for the actually shooting incident, police officers must be better trained when engaged in undercover work in high risk areas. They MUST understand that when undercover cops, especially black and Latinos, are attempting to blend into a particular scene (e.g., subway train and hot street corner) that it often occurs to the point that they are indistinguishable from the common perp on the street: they’re adorned with the same baggie jeans, timberland boots, hooded pullovers, puffy jackets and baseball caps.
If I was Sean Bell I would’ve mistaken the officer for a hit man too! Just think about it: (1) you come out of a strip club at 4am in the morning; (2) you’re probably drunk and tired; (3) you just had a huge verbal altercation with another group of men outside of the club and threats are made on both sides; (4) you and your friends walk around the corner and get inside your vehicle; (5) it’s late November and all of the windows are up; and (6) most likely everyone is talking about the night and the car stereo comes on immediately blasting the previous played tune. Under these circumstances, no one is truly alert. Now Sean Bell is attempting to just pull his car out of his parking spot and out of the corner of his eye, he spots a man, dressed in bagging blue jeans and hooded sweat jacket, with a huge automatic pistol drawn and aimed directly at the driver’s side window, fast approaching the vehicle on his left. His heart pumps, he flinches and he’s engrossed by fear because for all that he knows one of the homies from the club has followed them and is about to pump a barrage of bullets into his car. With all of the confusion and noise inside the car, he doesn’t hear the officers and have enough time to discern the badge necklace from a hip-hop medallion chain. In the split second that he has to make up his mind as to what to do, he has to rely on the glimpse of an unknown man charging his vehicle in a menacing way with weapon drawn. So he does, the natural thing (I certainly would’ve done the same), he floors the gas pedal and attempts to get the car and its occupants out of firing range. Meanwhile, the undercover police officer interprets this as an act of violence against him but he shouldn’t have given the circumstances stated above. He then proceeds, in violation of department rules, to pump an entire clip into the car as the vehicle was already by him. As the other officers arrive on the scene in unmarked police vehicles and proceed to block in the Mr. Bells car from both the front and the back, they’ve descended upon a vehicle with a panic and confused driver whose head is probably buried between his legs and under the steering, frantically attempting to use the last moment of his life to avoid being gunned down by a perceived group of gun toting criminals. When 51 shots are going off in 10 seconds, no one hears “It’s the Police don’t move” or sees the fact that it’s undercover officers. At this point, it’s complete chaos and mayhem and unfortunately an innocent person lost his life because the NYPD failed to follow the books.
First, the officers should have all been inside their unmarked vehicles and used their sirens to identify themselves as police officers from a safe distance and pulled over the car like in any other traffic situation. To have a lead undercover cop attempt to ambush a car of men, single handedly at 4am in the morning under the above circumstance was downright foolish and negligent. Was it criminal? Probably not, but very close. Was Sean Bell justified in reacting the way that he did? Hell yeah! I would’ve done the same! The number one rule in the hood when faced with a dangerous situation, get out of harm’s way and ask questions later. I’m a big supporter of law enforcement but this case simply breaks my heart – it was just a massive fuck up and unfortunately all of the affected families will have to pay the price for one officer’s stupid “mistake”.