dixons-park-slope-0710.jpgNew York has a reputation for being an expensive town, which of course it is. But the high housing prices and rents don’t tell the whole story. You see, New Yorkers don’t necessarily need cars. And our property taxes are pretty low. Which is why a Times story this weekend comparing the cost of living in Park Slope versus Orange, NJ found that a family of four with a household income of $170,000 could actually live more inexpensively in Brooklyn than Jersey. In fact, monthly expenses were $1,285 cheaper in the County of Kings. “Specifically, each month, the suburban family needs to lay out about $5,668 to run their home and commute to work in Manhattan, compared with $3,852 for the urban family,” said The Times. “That includes most relatively static expenses — from the mortgage, property taxes and homeowner’s insurance, to transportation, utility bills and, for the house, landscaping. ” The major caveat: If you want to send your kids to private school, fuhgettaboutit. You’re better off moving to the burbs.
High-Rise, or House With Yard? [NY Times]
Photo by Betty Blade


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. The “‘burbs” are always going to lose in this comparison. Better to compare cost of NYC with a small city, like Portland or Charlotte.

  2. “It would take a pretty cold fish to make such decisions based on cost alone, rather that more subjective factors.”
    For whatever reason, these kind of financial balances always have a great influence on population flows.

  3. Suburbandude: “Park Slope …. I cannot think of a less diverse community.”

    Really? is this hyperbole or are you just not capable of effective thinking?

  4. If you are a high earner (like Ditto, apparently) this comparison completely falls apart as the city tax gets brutal. If you have more than one kid, again, different story altogether.

1 19 20 21