Open Thread


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. there is a downside to choose to breastfeed versus formula in that, in general, people who were breast fed tend to be clingy adults. i just asked a bunch of people on my AIM list if they were breastfed or formula fed, and yep, 100 percent who were breastfed are the clingy types. granted my informal poll is not a true scientific experiment, but i bet if they did study this they would find it to be true.

    *rob*

  2. “Did someone mention supernova?”

    Look at your wedding ring. Assuming it’s gold or platium (or any other heavy metal), all of the atoms in your ring were created in a supernova.

  3. “you can now clearly see ‘footprints’ of the old towers n the site”

    Great pics Denton! That’s the view from my office. Now that the “footprints” are fully defined and being finished off with black granite (?) for the memorial, those mammoth holes in the ground are really eerie.

  4. Cursory review of today’s OT subjects:

    9. DONATELLA MUST NOT ATTEND YANKEE WHEN PHIL HUGHES IS PITCHING.

    BTW, Yanks winning 6-1 in the fifth. Donatella is not at the game. Coincidence?

  5. By CGar on July 21, 2010 2:25 PM

    “Tampons scare me”

    Me too. But not as much as bras. As Joey said about Chandler (yes, *rob*, FRIENDS, so shoot me!!): “He’s scared of bras. Can’t work ’em.” I think bras are why I initially changed teams.

    CGar,
    I believe the bra was invented by a man named Titslinger.
    true story.

  6. Gold is breaking down too, m4l. Consider this from gartman today….

    Regarding gold, firstly let’s note that the GLD ETF
    reported that its holdings of gold fell to 1.308.13 tonnes
    from 1.314.21 tonnes as of the 15th, or 6.083 tonnes
    less. The record level to which the ETF’s holdings of
    gold had gotten was 1.320.44 tonnes on the 29th of
    June, so there has been a quiet, but steady, net
    decline over the course of the past three weeks.
    Indeed, just going back to the first days of May, every
    single day the ETF’s holdings of gold rose. Sometimes
    the increases were very, very small, but sometimes the
    increases were large, with several days in which the
    holdings increased 15-20 tonnes! But since the start of
    July, every day has seen the ETF’s holdings of gold
    fall, with only one or two exceptions.
    This then brings us to a piece written by our very good
    friend, the always wry and ever inisighful, Jon Nadler
    of Kitco.com fame. Yesterday Jon wrote the following:
    That the gold market has become totally (and
    perhaps dangerously) dependent on
    investment demand was recently underscored
    by the CEO of research firm GFMS – Paul
    Walker. Mr. Walker opined that: “to maintain
    gold at current levels you have to have
    investment flows every hour of every day. If
    you can make an argument for rising
    investment demand for gold then the price of
    gold is likely to stay where it is. But I haven’t
    seen an asset class where investment flows
    are only up. Take that [investment demand]
    away and you’ve got a good argument for gold
    going down.”
    This is a more erudite way of saying what we have
    always said about markets: It takes buying and lots of it
    to put any market up; it takes a mere lack of buying to
    put the same market down. History has proven this to
    be true too many times not to be taken as axiomatic,
    despite what the academics might say to the contrary.
    We note then the chart of gold in US dollar terms at the
    lower left of p.1. Gold must hold here at $1185-$1190,
    for if it does not there is little if any support between
    there and $1100. We shall hold what we shall refer to
    as an “insurance” position in gold, but nothing more
    than that for now:

1 10 11 12 13 14 40