Register to leave a comment, or log in if you already have an account
By Legion on July 20, 2010 11:09 AM
As long as we are on the topic of sartorial correctness,
I have one giant pet peeve with all the men’s magazines I’ve happened to look through recently
How many do you “look through?” Do you ever read the articles or just look at pics of hot guys??
This is getting awfully close to a GOTD award. Certainly runner up.
Good thing you didn’t see my DILF discussion the other day. You, m4l and Chicken need to be very careful. LOL
Yeah, DIBs, it’s a headline…. I guess you have spent a lot of time analyzing apples to apples (and watching lunch partners throwing them at one another on this topic).
Etson, only problem is I had previously bought a bag (can’t recall the brand) that touted it’s ability to fit into the guideline thingy, then they shrunk the shit! I refuse to do it again, so I backpack it and just deal with looking like a tool at the airport.
donatella, you’re comparing apples & oranges with the GS numbers. The headlines rarely get the numbers correctly compared to the comparables from the year earlier.
Thanks cmu, those actually look pretty good. Maybe I’ll get one of them and see how it goes. If I find it’s too humiliating to use it, I’m only out a few bucks. If I end up liking it, I can go for a fancy schmancy version down the road.
As long as we are on the topic of sartorial correctness,
I have one giant pet peeve with all the men’s magazines I’ve happened to look through recently,
and that’s this:
MEN SHOULD NOT BE WEARING DRESS SHOES WITHOUT SOCKS!!!
You do not wear hard leather wingtips or brogues without socks unless you want your foot to resemble a macerated piece of boiled chicken skin by the end of the day and have the olfactory kick of a bag o’ rot.
By Legion on July 20, 2010 11:09 AM
As long as we are on the topic of sartorial correctness,
I have one giant pet peeve with all the men’s magazines I’ve happened to look through recently
How many do you “look through?” Do you ever read the articles or just look at pics of hot guys??
This is getting awfully close to a GOTD award. Certainly runner up.
Good thing you didn’t see my DILF discussion the other day. You, m4l and Chicken need to be very careful. LOL
Yeah, DIBs, it’s a headline…. I guess you have spent a lot of time analyzing apples to apples (and watching lunch partners throwing them at one another on this topic).
omg i was quote on gothamist about bedbugs.
lol
http://gothamist.com/2010/07/19/park_slope_movie_theater_spraying_f.php
*rob*
Etson, only problem is I had previously bought a bag (can’t recall the brand) that touted it’s ability to fit into the guideline thingy, then they shrunk the shit! I refuse to do it again, so I backpack it and just deal with looking like a tool at the airport.
donatella, you’re comparing apples & oranges with the GS numbers. The headlines rarely get the numbers correctly compared to the comparables from the year earlier.
Thanks cmu, those actually look pretty good. Maybe I’ll get one of them and see how it goes. If I find it’s too humiliating to use it, I’m only out a few bucks. If I end up liking it, I can go for a fancy schmancy version down the road.
As long as we are on the topic of sartorial correctness,
I have one giant pet peeve with all the men’s magazines I’ve happened to look through recently,
and that’s this:
MEN SHOULD NOT BE WEARING DRESS SHOES WITHOUT SOCKS!!!
You do not wear hard leather wingtips or brogues without socks unless you want your foot to resemble a macerated piece of boiled chicken skin by the end of the day and have the olfactory kick of a bag o’ rot.
Ditto, these days that bag frame guideline thingy barely fits a dang chihauhau.
Thinking about what MM said, my choice of satchel is probably a reversion to the security of my schoolboy days.
I’ll soon be wearing grey shorts and having scrapes on my knees from too many collisons with the playground tarmac.