timber-shed-040109.jpg
We wish this were an April Fool’s joke but it’s not. Despite protracted efforts by the preservation world and a number of alternative proposals, one of the most important pieces of Brooklyn’s history may be destined for destruction. According to a report in Crain’s yesterday afternoon, the National Guard and the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation have worked out a deal that would demolish all but one of 10 historic former naval residences that form Admiral’s Row along Flushing Avenue; the timber shed (above) would be spared the wrecking ball as well. If this is indeed the case, the short-sightedness and lack of imagination on the part of both parties is truly unconscionable. If the reported compromise on the future of the Admiral’s Row buildings is true we are deeply disappointed because the majority of these buildings could and should be saved,” wrote Lisa Kersavage of the Municipal Art Society in an email last night. “We will continue fighting to save these important structures. And Peg Breen, president of The New York Landmarks Conservancy, hit the nail on the head when she said that The Navy Yard made this an either-or situation, and it didn’t have to be that way. Indeed, the decision to frame the debate as preservation for the elites versus fresh food for the poor was a disgusting, though disappointingly effective, display of populist politics that conveniently pushed all the class and race buttons it was designed to and made it close to impossible to any politician to work towards saving the buildings. There’s supposed to be some kind of hearing to announce the “compromise” later this month. Let’s hope Crain’s got its information wrong.
Time Runs Out for Brooklyn’s Admiral’s Row [Crain’s]
Report: Admiral’s Row Discharged [Curbed]
Admiral’s Row: Up Close and Personal [Brownstoner]
MAS Floats Plans to Preserve Admiral’s Row & Build Market [Brownstoner]
Public Hearing on Admiral’s Row Held Last Night [Brownstoner]
Pratties Have ‘Cake-and-Eat-It’ Design for Admiral’s Row [Brownstoner]
Guard Starts Talks ‘To Come Up With Alternatives’ For Row [Brownstoner]
James Opens Door to (Partial) Admiral’s Row Preservation [Brownstoner]
Officers’ Row Supermarket Not Happening Anytime Soon [Brownstoner]
Admiral’s Row: Feds Must ‘Consider’ Preservation [Brownstoner]
Admiral’s Row: “Extremely High Level of Historic Integrity” [Brownstoner]
Officers’ Row: Let’s Have Our Cake and Eat It Too [Brownstoner]
Officers’ Row Preservation Coming to a Contentious Head [Brownstoner]
For Officer’s Row, Supermarket All But Certain [Brownstoner]
admirals-row-layout-0409.jpg


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. “r. b, i don’t like the idea of these buildings being demolished either. but c’mon, do you really think running a greenmarket will fund a restoration? figure the restoration will cost around $10mm — so on a five-year plan, you’d have to clear $2mm/year in pure profit. that’s some greenmarket!”

    That’s call Jerking Off to a fantasy! The City of New York has bigger problems now and all the Asshat can do is fund his wet dream that serves no purpose to anyone!

    The What (Yeah right)

    Someday this war is gonna end…

  2. “You’re entitled to your opinion that you’d like to see it torn down, but you can’t question the sincerity of our position.”

    Where did I said that Brownstoner? I don’t give a F*** about the Navy Yard!! I just just hate people being disingenuous and hypocrites!!! Those buildings in Admiral’s Row SERVED NO PURPOSE TO US IN BROOKLYN!!!!!!!!! Coney Island and Albee Square Mall did!!!!!!!!!!

    GOT IT STUPID!!!!

    The What

    Someday this war is gonna end…

  3. Pitbull and RajinCajun you don’t get it. Admirals row is land owned by the National Guard. They refused to issue an RFP for the project, and no one but the Navy Yard was ever considered to develop the property. No one COULD make an offer.

  4. Where were we, What? We’ve been decrying the destruction of old buildings since the day this blog started. As you may recall, we were recognized by HDC last year for our work on behalf of preservation (see link below). And as you can tell from all the links underneath the post, Admiral’s Row has been a special interest of ours for quite a while. You’re entitled to your opinion that you’d like to see it torn down, but you can’t question the sincerity of our position.

    http://tinyurl.com/cbxe6m

  5. mr. b, i don’t like the idea of these buildings being demolished either. but c’mon, do you really think running a greenmarket will fund a restoration? figure the restoration will cost around $10mm — so on a five-year plan, you’d have to clear $2mm/year in pure profit. that’s some greenmarket! i know you weren’t advancing a serious business proposal but the point is that funding a museum-quality restoration of these buildings will be incredibly expensive and there isn’t much money around these days. (although i’d support bailout money putting some contractors to work on this!)

  6. ” Historic preservation has been proven to have long-term positive effects on neighborhoods and land values. ”

    Hey riddle me this? Why all this Hyper Love for Admiral’s Row???!!! When the developer was tearing down half of Brooklyn in the Mutant Asset Bubble where was you???? How about Albee Square Mall for starters! Thor Equities demolished a standing Mall to build… another Mall?? Now we have a F**** hole in the ground and no activity on that site! Coney Island is another example!!! This is one (of many) reason why I can’t stand you Brownstoner, you are disingenuous and a hypocrite!!!!

    The What (Yeah Yeah Yeah)

    Someday this war is gonna end…

  7. RaginCajun,
    By your logic, then, should the preservationists be able to get a tax rebate for public spending projects that they don’t agree with? Maybe if they don’t have kids they can get some money back for the portion of their taxes that go to public schools. Brilliant idea!

1 2 3 4 5