What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Actually, there are quite a few people who know at least one local politician personally. Once again, think first, then post.

    Crown Heights is the best destination for the homeless shelter.

  2. “Here’s the skinny. With your income, you can qualify for a place that costs just under $160,000. Unfortunately, you’re not going to find much in Manhattan for that price, but you’ll be able to find something nice in either Brooklyn or Queens.”
    Babs, really! Nice in Brooklyn for $160,000? Where?

  3. Very few people know too many politicians personally, 12:18. Your statement show less thought than mine does. I still stand by mine – Crown Heights is not the best place for a super shelter. Every single neighborhood in Brooklyn is equally qualified to be “the best place”. The intake facility for Manhattan’s indigent men should be in Manhattan.

  4. If you don’t know Tish James, then you obviously don’t know Crown Heights, as she represents part of the area. Therefore you certainly are in no position to judge whether or not Crown Heights is “the best place” for the shelter.

    Montrose Morris

  5. I’d prefer that the homeless shelter not come to Brooklyn AT ALL. However, if it must come to Brooklyn, then Crown Heights is probably the best place for it.

    I don’t know Tish James, but as for Markowitz, he will definitely sell out if the price is right. If he sold out to Ratner, he’ll sell out to anyone else so long as the price is right.

1 3 4 5 6