Escaped Parolee a Game-Changer for Saint Ann's Stance
Channel 9’s Ti-Hua Chang reports from the streets of Brooklyn Heights about the latest chapter in the controversy surrounding the U.S. Attorney’s decision to located a Federal parolee center steps away from the campus of the Saint Ann’s School. When news broke about the issue in July, the school administration tried to take an enlightened…
Channel 9’s Ti-Hua Chang reports from the streets of Brooklyn Heights about the latest chapter in the controversy surrounding the U.S. Attorney’s decision to located a Federal parolee center steps away from the campus of the Saint Ann’s School. When news broke about the issue in July, the school administration tried to take an enlightened approach to the matter. “We believe that as long as the school and its neighbors are doing everything they can to ensure student safety, there is a limit to the extent to which the school can or should appropriately try to influence, block or change the environment and facilities in which Saint Ann’s has always chosen to locate itself,” wrote the headmaster and board president at the time. Just two weeks into the school year, however, a 32-year-old parolee who’d already done 12 years in jail on drug-related charges, bolted from an interrogation room at 147 Pierrepont Street at 2:50 in the afternoon, ten minutes before school let out. Two armed officers pursued him on the street, where one parent reported seeing one of the officers reach for his gun before thinking better of it. On top of that, it’s come to light that 53 sex offenders (six of whom are pedophiles) have been visiting the parole office, contrary to assurances initially given the school administration. Needless to say, the school administration has now changed its tune and will be asking a Federal judge to relocate the probation office to the courts.
Video: Next-Door Parolees Worry Parents [my9tv]
Yassky Weighs in on Saint Ann’s Probation Office Affair [Brownstoner]
Saint Ann’s To Make the Best of Probation Office Move [Brownstoner]
Federal Probation Officer Defends Proximity to St. Ann’s [Brownstoner]
Parole Facility Planned Next Door to St. Ann’s School [Brownstoner]
in a family neighborhood? Most neighborhoods are. It’s the type of family yeah?
it’s called COURT street for a reason. Toughen up or move. Why can’t st ann’s move?
I will say, in St. Anne’s defense, I grew up in the city and I do recall the St. Anne’s kids being pretty doughy and soft private school snowflakes. I hope their eyeballs are ok if they saw his go down.
q man, yeah, you know it all, and have all the answers,
thank you. we appreciate your self-certified sagacity.
I know that Brownstoner uses the word “parolee” but federal criminals do not get parole. And yes, GSA explicitly looked for office space near the court. Officers and others travel frequently between the probation office and the court. I don’t discount for a second the smarts, tenacity and social connections of St. Ann’s parents but I do not think that relocating the probation facility is going to be the solution. Time will tell. Oh, and it’s g man.
Chaka:
“Were they going to revoke his parole and return him to prison upon the completion of the interrogation?”
Bingo!
q man, first of all, you are confused if you think that the GSA does not kow-tow to federal judges. I know, I have been there, I have heard the judge say: “I need parking for myself and my staff and my senior secretary drives an SUV and can’t parallel park, so give her a big space” …or “these antique chandeliers are gloomy, get rid of them and give me something brighter ….or, hypothetically: “I want the parole facility to be a five minute walk from my chambers and I want it to be in Brooklyn Heights”. Don’t blame it on the GSA, they probably wanted something more practical.
But St Ann’s parents are no slouches, they should turn on the pressure -big time- and they will get results. At the very least it will put the fed judges and the Courts on notice that there are real people living in the community and that they are not putting up with this brainless arrogance.
How does a parolee escape? If he was on parole that would mean that he was already released from prison. Were they going to revoke his parole and return him to prison upon the completion of the interrogation?
Okay, where to begin? I guess with the joke; “St. Annie get your gun” is pretty clever. Contiuing top to bottom, it’s a federal facility so slick’s reference to the city budget is irrelevant. And I disagree with pierre’s geographic sense. One Pierrepont Plaza isn’t “smack-dab in the middle of a family neighborhood;” it’s on the edge of where a commercial corridor meets a residential neighborhood. statestreets ‘love it or leave it’ tone leaves something to be desired, but his/her basic point is sound. If you want highly separated land uses, suburbia will probably satisfy that need better than a large city. Brownstoner’s reference to the school’s request that a “Federal judge … relocate the probation office to the courts” seems to have confused sam, who then infers that a judge put this facility in this building. In fact, the General Services Admistration (GSA) makes those kinds of decisions. And has been making those kinds of decisions about this particular facility for over thirty years–that is how long the probation office of the Eastern District of New York has been in commercial office buildings in Downtown Brooklyn. The reason the probation office has not been in the courthouse itself since the mid-70s is lack of space and despite the recent expansion of the federal court, space is still tight. Unless GSA violated laws or rules about the siting of these types of facilities, I do not see the federal government walking away from a multi-year lease and the money it spent on the build-out. Other strategies will probably need to be explored. What’s a Ralph Lauren chase scene?
Also, these are federal probationers, and the federal courthouse is on the other side of Cadman, much more than 100 yards away.
I was one of the people who initially thought this was a lot of hysterical, overcaffeinated NIMBYism, but when I actually saw the proximity of the facility to the school, children gamboling about among armed marshalls, it is a little alarming. In the city there will always be jarring juxtapositions, part of the fun of urban life, but when you have RL chase scenes during lower school pick-up, enough is enough.
statestreeter, it is not very civil to tell people to move out because they disagree with you. There is downtown, and there is Brooklyn Heights. they are adjacent but different. this facility belongs downtown not on Pierrepont Street, which is entirely in Brooklyn Heights. You may feel that you are all pressed up agaisnt people, I do not know your situation, but many of us feel we deserve more, and we feel justified in demanding it from elected officials and from judges, who as a group, are perhaps the most entitled and arrogant professionals on the planet. I resent that a judge feels it is A-OK to place a parole office next to a school. It is arrogant and exhibits a certain level of backward-thinking. Brownstone Brooklyn is no longer composed primarily of kooks and misfits. There are serious people living here now. It’s 2008. And these people are not going to take this passively, I do not think it is necessary to wait for a child to be taken hostge or (God forbid)shot to demand the removal of this facilty from the neighborhood. Perhaps you should check your attitude and move somewhere yourself where you might feel more at home. Brooklyn has changed around you.