gowanus_141009.jpg
In late September, the Gowanus Canal, polluted from sewage runoff and years of industrial waste, made headlines when Riverkeeper, a watchdog organization, threatened to sue major polluters unless they take remedial action. The Environmental Protection Agency is also considering the waterway as a possible Super Fund, which would take extensive containment measures and look for clean-up funds through litigation against present and past polluters. The Bloomberg administration opposed both these plans, offering that the city could clean the canal faster, without hampering private development—and Friday, in a pump house along the canal, Bloomberg announced the details of his plan: a two-stage process that he expects would clean the canal within ten years. The first stage, according to The Architect’s Newspaper, consists of three capital programs to increase fresh water flow, dredge the river, and increase capacity to transport and process sewage runoff. The second, and more vague, stage involves approaching companies to help remedy some of the long-term environmental damage, with matching funds from the federal Water Resources Development Act. The city would grant oversight rights to the EPA, which could step in if the city’s program failed to meet its standards. There are no data yet concerning which plan, city clean-up or the Super Fund process, would be safer for residents or more environmentally sound. Some people have criticized Bloomberg, saying that his sudden interest in the canal isn’t just to protect private development but because Riverkeeper implicated the city’s Department of Transportation as one of the polluters. The decision has caused some polarization and frustration already; at Friday’s announcement, for example, eight supporters of Super Fund designation were barred entry to the event, while the developer Toll Brothers was allowed inside, reports the Daily News. A Bloomberg representative said that it was simply a private event for invited guests and the media. And there are other residents, on the other hand, who don’t care who cleans the canal, as long as someone does.
Riverkeeper, Feds, State Jostle to Clean Gowanus [Brownstoner]
Advocates of Super Fund Barred from City Conference [Daily News]
Flushing the Gowanus [Architect’s Newspaper]
Photo by Timothy Vogel


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

  1. I agree with NSS, just fill the canal in already. It has been such a problem and an eyesore for decades.
    The canal is gross. Make a park above it with grass and trees. Why must every morsel of land have to have a building on it???

  2. 1. How can the city or EPA be trusted because they’ve ignored it up til now? Superfund has been around for 30 years and they’ve “missed” a huge site despite obvious pollution that’s close to millions of people.

    Likewise, it wasn’t long ago that the city said they couldnt afford to fix the pump that has been flushing the canal for the last few years.

    I have supported Superfunding the site because it assures that it will eventually get cleaned up. However, I concede that it’s not necessary. NY’s politicians should attempt to get funding from the Fed Govt that doesnt require 3rd parties writing checks in order to start the work. The sooner it’s cleaned up, the better off NY is.

  3. I live a block away from the canal and I would certainly prefer to have the City do the clean-up. Those who support the Super Fund just don’t understand the negitive effect that will have on home owners in the area. Who the hell wants to live in a Super Fund area? Plus the Super Fund takes decades to do anything.I don’t think Three Mile Island is completely cleaned yet. I’m not crazy about the proposed development though.

  4. Start the countdown clock…..

    It should only be a short time before the anti-everything group starts filing suits and protesting any cleanup plan because it will:

    1. Increase traffic
    2. release pollutants into the air
    3. be done with ‘community input’
    4. lead to gentrification
    5. Some other frivolous reason I cant even fathom