brooklyn-existing-map-0509.jpgStreetcars were once a big part of Brooklyn life—could they play a role in connecting currently underserviced areas while enhancing the street-level experience? That’s the theory being floated by some enthusiasts. And people are starting to listen. Most notably, DOT Commissioner Janette Sadik-Kahn who, noting the success of its streetcar system in generating economic developer, recently said We need to rebalance the transportation network and make it as efficient and effective as possible. (Midwood resident Arthur Melnick has been pushing this idea for many years, particularly for the waterfront areas of Red Hook and Brooklyn Heights, and the Brooklyn Historic Railway Association has even built a few tracks over near Ikea.) And while there are nostalgic and touristic reasons to consider the idea, blog The Transit Politic sums up the practical side of the issue:

Brooklyn is ideal for streetcars, and the city should be considering their widespread installation in areas where improved transit service is needed, because they’re effective in creating denser, more livable neighborhoods. The eastern half of Berlin is perhaps a good example for how Brooklyn could integrate streetcars into its existing transportation network. There, the 192 km collection of Straßenbahn lines run in areas that are not adequately served by the U-Bahn and S-Bahn rail services. The system runs mostly in areas that are less dense than Brooklyn overall, but it still attracts high ridership. (Berlin’s most central borough, Friedrichshain-Kreuzberg, has a density of 13,000 people/km2, equivalent to that of Brooklyn; the rest of Berlin, however, has about half that density.) Why not, then, envision a similarly ambitious program for transit expansion in Brooklyn?

Indeed, though streetcars have far lower capacity than subways, they’re far cheaper to build and they carry significantly more people than bus lines when they’re built close to light rail standards, with some of their own running way, high-quality stations, and extended vehicles. Because they’re electrically operated, they’re also pollution-free (directly, not necessarily indirectly). For a city that’s incapable of building a tiny two-mile extension of its subway system on time and on budget, a streetcar network might be the solution.

The blog highlights much of southeastern Brooklyn, Red Hook and parts of Bed Stuy as areas whose residents desperately need better access to existing public transit. Crazy, or so crazy it just might work?
Streetcars for Brooklyn: A New Life? [The Transport Politic]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Indeed Adam, it looks great.

    Now let’s get rolling with eminent domain, start knocking down houses, and widening the streets to make room for a light rail system.

    May we start with yours?

  2. GUYS GUYS GUYS. Just take the PATH 1 stop from WTC and you can se how the light rail is a major success in Hudson County. It look them 6 years to complete. 6 years!!!

    Take a look at the link below. It has pictures of the lightrail/streetcar, which is basically the subway above ground on the street. It works and nobody gets run over.

    http://web.presby.edu/~jtbell/transit/JerseyCity/

    If Jersey can do it, why can’t Brooklyn.

  3. Yeah, if you get to the A/C which does not stop at the obvious place, Atlantic. It’s pretty inconvenient for me in PS.

    And if they were thinking about it, looping the A/C to Kennedy at the current transfer point and adding additional service would’ve been a far better solution. Oh, no, we have to have yet another oddball made-only-in-Spain train system with all its overruns and quirks.

  4. I disagree cmu, I think the light rail to Kennedy is pretty good. The A train to Howard beach is convenient for Brooklynites and the E out to Archer Avenue is convenient to folks along the E and F lines including midtown manhattan. The cost is another matter. We are not subsidized by the west german banks like the folks in East Berlin. We have to pay, and through the nose, for all these things. Really, the US government would prefer you to just buy a car leave them alone.

  5. The light rail system to Kennedy is a poster child of what NOT to do…start from the middle of nowhere so you have to take another mode of transit to get there, schelp yoou bags several 100 yds, then pay a lot to get to the airport. What a stupid planning idea.

    SF took years, but finally (and with the same objecgtors, taxi/limo/bus services) just made the existing BART line loop thru the airport. What a brilliant success, it’s so easy to reach SF or points south by BART now.

  6. It’s true I don’t know you, fsrg. But untrue that’s there are no studies or science behind the light rail vs. fast bus debate. So maybe, just maybe, it is you that doesn’t know WTF you’re talking about.

    Fast buses in dedicated lanes vs. light rails are a national debate. There are pros and cons for both and there’s not a clear cut winner.

    Here’s an article from a Portland paper comparing both, and it even cites studies:
    http://www.portlandtribune.com/sustainable/story.php?story_id=119463522630488700

1 2 3 4 5 10