Can Ditmas Park Save The Middle Class?
Despite tremendous quality-of-life gains, more residents left New York City in 2006 than in 1993. (Brooklyn was the one borough that bucked that trend.) The main reason, says an article from the American Enterprise Institute, is the the rising cost of living for middle-class families. In fact, New York now has the lowest rate of…

Despite tremendous quality-of-life gains, more residents left New York City in 2006 than in 1993. (Brooklyn was the one borough that bucked that trend.) The main reason, says an article from the American Enterprise Institute, is the the rising cost of living for middle-class families. In fact, New York now has the lowest rate of middle-income families of any city; and, except for Los Angeles, it also has the smallest percentage of middle-income neighborhoods. One exception—and a model for the future—is Ditmas Park:
The ‘place’ Ellen and Joe looked for was not just a physical location but something less tangible: a sense of community and a neighborhood to raise their hoped-for children. Although they considered suburban locations, as most families do, ultimately they chose the Ditmas Park neighborhood of Brooklyn, where Joe had grown up. At first, this seemed a risky choice. While Joe was growing up in the 1980s, the neighborhood—a mixture of Victorian homes and modest apartments—had become crime-infested. The old families were moving out, and newer ones were not replacing them. Yet Joe’s Mom still lived there, and they liked the idea of having grandma around for their planned-for family.
Politicians genuflect to the idea of maintaining a middle class, yet their actions suggest otherwise. In a city that has been losing middle-class families for generations, the resurgence of places like Ditmas Park represents a welcome change. In recent years, child-friendly restaurants and shops have started up along once-decayed Cortelyou Road. More important, some local elementary schools have shown marked improvement, with an increase in parental involvement and new facilities. Even in hard economic times, the area has become a beacon to New York families, as well as singles seeking a community where they will put down long-term roots. There’s an attempt in this neighborhood to break down the city feel and to see this more as a kind of a small town, notes Ellen. It may be in the city, but it’s a community unto itself, a place where you can stay and raise your children.
If cities like New York want to nurture their middle-class populations, the article suggests, they will need to shift their priorities away from “subsidizing developers for luxury mega-developments, new museums, or performing arts centers” and instead focus on “those things critical to the middle class such as maintaining relatively low density work areas and shopping streets, new schools, and parks.” In our opinion, at the end of the day, it’s all about the schools.
The Luxury City vs. the Middle Class [The American]
“…well when generations of americans referred to queens and brooklyn as “the country” and most manhattanites do as well, it’s suburbia.”
The country???? Brooklyn??? I mean, if you go back far enough I guess this was all just countryside, but the same is true of Manhattan…or Paris for that matter. And yes, some Manhattanites may refer to the outer boroughs as “suburbs” with some derision, but that’s high school stuff.
I don’t know how the statistic has changed but before the recent crash only 7% of New Yorker’s had salaries over 100k.
Someone asked for the median household income:
2005
Manhattan
$56,000
Brooklyn
$37,000
Queens
$48,000
Bronx
$29,000
Staten Island
$63,000
http://www.newyorkfed.org/regional/profile_nyc.html
i was being a little funny about the kids not being expensive part. oh i know they CAN be expensive. depends on how you raise them. i was a very VERY inexpensive child.
*rob*
well when generations of americans referred to queens and brooklyn as “the country” and most manhattanites do as well, it’s suburbia. it’s a different kind suburbia, fer sure than the stereotypical one you think of, but it’s a suburn non the less. i stand by my belief that i am a middle class person living in the suburbs of new york city. there i said it ;-0
*rob*
median income appears to be around the $50k level as Rob stated.
http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/36000.html
I had asked the same question several months back when trying to work out at what level I felt comfortable buying a house again.
Kensingtonian, without getting too conspiratorial I would think the City has a vested interest in having as many people as possible thinking they were well to do.
What would take-home monthly pay be for a couple making $75k each then?
“children really aren’t THAT expensive when you think about it, and you do get tax breaks, right?”
rob, i generally enjoy your posts, but on the above point…you have no idea, brother, not a clue.
Rob, soon you’ll be arguing that even Manhattan is not the city! But seriously, I guess I just don’t grasp your city/suburbia distinction.
Isn’t the median income for Brooklyn something low like $45K?
So that means there are WAAAAY more people making about 20K in Brooklyn or less than there are people making 250K…