brooklynbridge.jpg
The headlines more or less say it all: And Maybe a Side Trip to Manhattan? and Fugheddaboud What You Think You Know About Brooklyn. That’s right, media outlets are once again pitching Brooklyn as a tourist destination and alternative to Manhattan. Two travel articles published this weekend in the Wall Street Journal and the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review offer sample itineraries for short stays in Brooklyn. The Tribune-Review’s one-day rundown covers standard guidebook fare for a 24-hour visit (walk over Brooklyn Bridge-eat at Grimaldi’s-visit Prospect Park-go to the zoo or Botanic Gardens or Brooklyn Museum-stroll around Park Slope), while the Journal’s three-day itinerary suggests slightly more off-kilter activities, like taking a canoe trip on the Gowanus Canal and catching a show at the Lyceum. Hey, with all the hotels getting built, we’re certainly gonna need all the tourists we can get.
And Maybe a Side Trip to Manhattan? [Wall Street Journal]
Fugheddaboud What You Think You Know About B’klyn [Tribune-Review]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. agreed. i pay more to live in park slope then i did while living on the upper west side.

    and if you gave me a million bucks today, i wouldn’t move back to manhattan.

    people who assume everyone MUST prefer manhattan over brooklyn are ignorant.

    ignore them.

  2. good article.

    i’ve noticed A TON of tourists in park slope this year.

    met a couple from amsterdam the other night at union hall. they said they’ve been hearing a lot about brooklyn…mainly from lonely planet and other friends who have come to the states.

1 3 4 5