For those of you who followed the listing-poaching story last week, the founder of the brokerage firm involved has responded and we’ve updated the original post with her email. You decide for yourself if you believe her.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Biff, I’m technically challenged, but I’ll be happy to tinyurl the link if you tell me how.

    Thanks very much, DIBS. It’s a great house (and Carroll, between Henry and Clinton is a fantastic block), and I miss the Parlor Floor and especially the garden. I can’t say I miss most of the tenants I had over the years and especially the constant work required (and the attendant cost). That said, I am looking at houses again (as well as apartments) and considering taking the plunge again for the right house at the right price.

  2. MacD – to respond to your question, the potential harm to the FSBO owner is a realtor claiming some sort of relationship with the owner (or maybe even an a buyer) and seeking some form of commission and delaying or derailing a sale. Not likely, but a risk. Plus, sounds like they advertized for more than what the FSBO did. Just generally creates confusion with potential buyers, and could in a worse case, create a problem with a sale.

  3. Is she telling us with a straight face that all listings were taken down within 5 minutes of the owner’s call? The owner called her firm on July 9th and the listing wasn’t taken down until July 10th. THE NEXT DAY. And it was only taken down after she got a huge amount of bad press in B’stoner.

    So her response includes one blatant and verifiable lie. Does she really expect us to believe the rest?

  4. this lady’s doing herself no favors even if, by some incredible stretch of the imagination, they did send the owner some emails (which i highly doubt).

    she manages to be: 1) ridiculously self-congratulatory (“the house was advertised well enough…,” “reaped the benefit”), 2) threatening to both brownstoner and the owner (“defame”, “smearing”), and 3) delusional and self-pitying (“for no good reason”). all the while, she admits to making “an error” but makes zero apology for it. incredible.

1 2 3 4 5 6 8