building
yard
You gotta love this building (and its interior courtyard). Built in 1878, the Tower Building, as it is known, is considered an example of Romanesque Revival architecture. To our unstudied eye, however, it feels a good deal more ornate than what we traditionally associate with the Romanesque tradition. Sure there are the rounded arches, but the design feels too light and the details (particularly the ornate ironwork) too fanciful to fit neatly in that box. Plus wasn’t the Victorian style still popular at this date? What do people who actually know something about architecture think? GMAP


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. BTW any interesting note (especially to those who like to post here about how much better housing was 100 years ago for the average person)

    From the NY Times article here is a description of these “model” apartments

    “The rooms are small — 10 feet by 18 feet is the largest. Three of the rooms in a four-room apartment were bedrooms and the living room served as a kitchen and dining room as well. Each unit had a toilet, and there were bathing facilities in the basement.”

  2. I love this building. Admire it everyday when I drive by on the bqe. “Progressive workers housing” might be a euphemism for tenement. I read somewhere that they were once tenements. Beautiful nonetheless.

1 2