What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. “Please tell me what century NYC housing sold at 8x rents? 17th? 18th?” Try the early 90s, the 1990s. My Center Slolpe building, and the one next door, went for about 8X rents. That was the trough of the last downturn. I think this one will be worse economically but hopefully crime, drugs, and racial friction won’t be as bad. Happy Thanksgiving all.

  2. Some more data…

    Simply put, from 1985-2002, the price of an average
    house in the US compared to the annualised average
    rent was 8.08:1. That is if we took the
    annual gross figures for rent and divided that into the
    average housing price, the average house sold at 8.08
    times as much as that rent.
    The ratio rose steadily from the mid-80’s on into the early
    ’00s.Back in ’85, the ratio stood at approximately 5.5:1.
    By ’95 it crossed 8:1; by 2000 it was all the way up to
    nearly 10:1, and the speed with which the ratio was rising
    was itself rising.
    In the ’00’s, the ratio began to move nearly parabolically,
    for by ’02 it was passing 10:1… or nearly double what it
    had been only 17 years earlier. It reached its peak at
    15:1 in ’05… Three times what it had been in ’85. At that
    point, all common sense was gone when it came to home
    pricing. They sky was indeed the limit. It was the year of
    the “no-doc/low doc/liars loans” made by the likes of
    Countrywide and Golden West Financial, and it was the
    peak of The Bubble. It was that year that Mr. Mozillo’s
    tan became its most glorious, and it was that year that
    created the problem we are now trying badly to unwind.
    Further, we can see in another chart compiled by
    economy.com … that of price vs. income…. just how
    egregious was the madness that reached its peak in ’05
    in housing. For the period between 1985-2000, that
    average price of the average house in the US sold
    consistently at over very near to 1.88 times the average
    annual income. The deviations were really very, very
    small over that period, if we are to believe Moody’s work,
    and we see on reason not to, rarely moving above 1.9:1
    and rarely moving below 1.8:1. A move of 0.1 was
    material.
    However, in ’01, the ratio “broke out” to the upside and
    crossed 2:1. By ’03 it was heading toward 2.2:1; by ’04 it
    was 2.3:1 and in ’05… the year when it all came undone…
    the ratio moved to 2.4:1. It has since fallen back below
    2.0:1 and is now down to the lows of the past twenty
    five years. The trend, however, remains down as the
    Bubble has burst and as real estate punters are
    themselves being punted from their positions. It will stop
    when it stops, but like markets everywhere, it will
    overshoot to the downside before its done. It is trying
    even now.