bbparkbridge032207.jpg
If a tree falls behind the Brooklyn Eagle’s paid-subscription firewall, does it make a sound on the Internet? Only if some resourceful blogger willing to shell out the required coinage is quick with his cut-and-paste. In this case, Brooklyn Heights Blog nicely grabbed this somewhat startling image of the proposed elevated cross-walk from the Heights to Brooklyn Bridge Park that was released, presumably, as part of Tuesday night’s meeting of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Waterfront Local Development Corporation(LDC). BHB notes that the designer of the futuristic catwalk is “traffic engineering” guru Sam Schwartz. BHB doesn’t like the design at all, calling it “wack.” (Where’s Streetsblog on this one?) It does feel like it’s trying too hard to be different for its own sake, though maybe there’s some form-follows-function thing at work here that we’re not getting. Oh, yeah, probably because we couldn’t read the darn article. C’mon, Eagle, get with the program!
Proposed Connection to BBP is Wack [Brooklyn Heights Blog]


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. Actually at both ends of the park (@ atlantic and @ fulton ferry landing) there is no elevation at all and bikes, etc can enter there. Assuming you’d like one entry point in the middle as well, the possible entry at the Clark St Station would take care of that.

  2. Awfully easy to pan everything. The fact is there’s a significant elevation difference to get people from the promenade to Fuhrman street. One alternative is an elevator, but public elevators tend to be bad ideas. This ramp/spiral concept does the job and also avoids stairs for the baby stroller/bike/roller blader crowd. If you Posters have better ideas, please get involved. And no, I’m not the designer of the ramp or a park planner or a relative…just someone who saw the prestentation.

  3. I agree with 12:35. I signed up when it was free and I advertised with them. now you can’t even read an article without giving them money. they are very old school..time to come into the 21st century!

  4. I second the complaint about the Eagle’s paid subcription deal. When they first started asking readers to sign up for free, I reluctantly did, but now that they’re asking for money, I’ve stopped reading. Don’t they already rake it in with the pages of legal notices they print every day, all of which come somewhat dubiously from the publishers’ connections to the Brooklyn Courts. It’s a shame because as of late they’ve had some good stuff — that nobody outside of Brooklyn Heights and Downtown Brooklyn have access to. For shame, for shame.