scaranocrooktag.jpg scarano.jpg
The city just released a press release saying it has filed “administrative” charges against architect Robert Scarano, “alleging that he made false or misleading statements on applications submitted to the Buildings Department in connection with two new buildings in Brooklyn.” The charges have to do with one of the most frequent criticisms Scarano’s critics have had of the architect: That he has used a very creative interpretation of zoning regulations in his building filings. Per the press release: “The administrative charges are in connection with documents for two Brooklyn apartment houses that Scarano filed with the Buildings Department in 2000 and 2002. Scarano is alleged to have improperly divided a zoning lot into two smaller lots for the two new buildings, 158 Freeman Street and 1037 Manhattan Avenue, resulting in the construction of two noncompliant buildings. With the two independent zoning lots, 158 Freeman Street could not have been legally built at all as a residential building and 1037 Manhattan Avenue as designed would have been smaller by approximately 2,000 square feet.” Scarano may be suspended from filing plans with the DOB, and he’s going to have to present a defense to an administrative law judge. Full press release on the jump.
Scarano: Licensed to Ill? [Brownstoner]

CITY FILES CHARGES AGAINST ARCHITECT ROBERT SCARANO

Architect Filed False Documents to Improperly Construct Two New Buildings

Acting Buildings Commissioner Robert D. LiMandri and Department of Investigation Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn today announced administrative charges have been filed against licensed architect Robert Scarano, alleging that he made false or misleading statements on applications submitted to the Buildings Department in connection with two new buildings in Brooklyn. The charges are the result of a partnership between the Department of Investigation’s Buildings Special Investigation Unit and the Buildings Department’s Special Enforcement Team to identify and build cases against repeat offenders who flout building and zoning regulations.

The administrative charges are in connection with documents for two Brooklyn apartment houses that Scarano filed with the Buildings Department in 2000 and 2002. Scarano is alleged to have improperly divided a zoning lot into two smaller lots for the two new buildings, 158 Freeman Street and 1037 Manhattan Avenue, resulting in the construction of two noncompliant buildings. With the two independent zoning lots, 158 Freeman Street could not have been legally built at all as a residential building and 1037 Manhattan Avenue as designed would have been smaller by approximately 2,000 square feet.

We will not tolerate anyone who knowingly attempts to mislead the Department with false documents. Our Special Enforcement Team is identifying repeat offenders and building cases against them. Flouting building and zoning regulations undermines the quality of life for all New Yorkers, and we will continue to identify and hold accountable individuals who abuse the rules, said Acting Buildings Commissioner LiMandri. I’d like to extend my thanks to Commissioner Rose Gill Hearn for her full commitment to our partnership to crack down on misconduct in the construction industry.

DOI will continue to work with the Department of Buildings to root out licensed professionals whose word cannot be relied on to protect the public safety and the integrity of the City’s Building Code, said DOI Commissioner Gill Hearn.

Scarano has been charged with knowingly or negligently filing false or misleading documents with the Buildings Department and displaying negligence, incompetence or lack of knowledge with regard to building and zoning regulations. The charges were filed under regulations made possible by State Assembly Bill 7746 that authorize the Buildings Commissioner to exclude licensed architects from filing applications for permits if they are found to have knowingly or negligently submitted false documents. With these charges, Scarano faces possible suspension or revocation of his ability to file documents with the Buildings Department. Scarano may respond to the charges and present a defense to an administrative law judge at the Office of Administrative Tribunals and Hearings.

The Special Enforcement Plan, announced in July 2007, is the result of a collaborative effort by Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, Housing and Buildings Chair Erik Martin Dilan, City Councilman James Oddo, and the Buildings Department to raise the bar for construction standards citywide. Under the Special Enforcement Plan, eight new multidisciplinary enforcement units, one construction monitoring program and one research group have been created at the Buildings Department to conduct proactive inspections of construction sites, crack down on repeat offenders who repeatedly skirt building and zoning regulations, and strengthen oversight of the professional certification program. Since the Plan’s inception, these new units have inspected over 4,700 construction sites, identified approximately 85 individuals or companies for possible disciplinary action, and reviewed over 2,300 professionally-certified plans for compliance with the Building Code and Zoning Resolution. Since July 2007, these teams have issued over 1,200 Stop Work Orders and nearly 4,000 violations to sites in all five boroughs.


What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. LOVE the haircut and tie, seriously! It shows that he’s a real person that’s just trying to do what he loves- be an architect! All you dirt bags care about is having robots live in a perfect, evenly built city- BORING! Leave Scarano alone already.

  2. What about all those workers killed on all those job sites and the families forced to evacuate their homes because he signed off,no doubt fraudulently, on his submissions to the DOB. In one case an elderly woman had to be placed in a nursing home. That is criminal negligence in my book and he should be PROSECUTED to the fullest extent of the law. The Brooklyn DA’s office should take notice and i am assuming they already have.

  3. He’s been charged, but not yet convicted on two of his recent projects. All the rest of your blather about his history and everyone else for that matter is meaningless unless they are charged and convicted. Whether you like the designs or not (I personally am not a fan), doesn’t mean he has done anything wrong as yet. Maybe slick the ATTY can chime in here. As for the designs out there in general and the builders subsequent construction of it, if the market is willing to buy it, then maybe Slick again can speak to Caveat Emptor. I am all for the Market speaking to what is wanted and needed not some bunch of granola eating, community gardening, elitist thinking, “you haven’t given to the community” socialist idiots. BLOW ME!

  4. I dont know scarano personally so I dont know what his motivations are or anything.

    As an atty, I understand when someone attempts to exploit technicalities to maximize value.

    As a person walking by, I think the architect who designed many of the buildings built recently in NY should be punished for aesthetic crimes against humanity.

  5. 5:05 – yes, this goes back to self-cert and a very generous interpretation of the zoning code. But by now, pretty much every one of his projects has been audited, but none have had to come down or be radically reduced. The developer (who hired the architect for his zoning “expertise”) always seems to get away with buying air rights or lowering a ceiling height.

    The list of zoning dodges is myriad, and by no means limited to Bob Scarano. 9:45 is right, the zoning code is so open to interpretation that its ripe for abuse. And the abuse is facilitated by DOB and developers. Scarano was just the best at it, but you could audit 75% of the new buildings in Brooklyn and find seriously flawed zoning interpretations.

    Yes, 10:18, the timing of these charges sure looks like someone looking for a fall guy, but that doesn’t mean the charges are unfounded.

1 2 3 4