What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. on ferries I think bigger question is best use of subsidies..and it appears that money for ferries is getting little bang for the buck.
    I think it is becoming more apparent that they are more a romantic notion than a viable means of mass transport. They are only practical for a very few people. Unfortunate as that is.

  2. 9:27, the government has a long history of subsidizing private operations. In fact, we’re subsidizing the cars and buses that drive over the “free” bridges by maintaining those bridges with tax money.

    Every way to commute across the East River is subsidized: private cars, buses, trains, tramway. The ferry is subsidized by the various government efforts to maintain the river for shipping (Coast Guard, dredging, etc.) and with docks built by the government. What if the government actually subsidized it enough for it to make sense as a commuting option?

    http://capntransit.blogspot.com/2007/12/water-taxi-what-if.html

    That’s my Queens perspective. Here’s a Brooklyn perspective:

    http://www.brooklyn11211.com/archive/2007/12/water_taxi_pres.html

  3. I don’t take the ferry to work from Brooklyn to Manhattan, but I agree that the city should do something to help (to some extent) (sucks if you bought your place to be convenient to ferry service). The same thing happened in Jersey as well with some of the Hudson River crossings, with many of them either phased out completely or severely limited. (Summer service is great for the tourists, but what about those who live here year round)

    If other agencies can get some state/federal funds (MTA, Port Authority PATH, Staten Island Ferry etc.), why not these ferry lines?