Turning Up The Pressure on Grand and Putnam
Yesterday was a big day for our favorite drug-dealing hot spot at Putnam and Grand. First, the New York Sun ran a big story by Brad Hope about the escalating problems on the corner that we thought did an excellent job of framing the historical problems as well as the current resolve of community members…
Yesterday was a big day for our favorite drug-dealing hot spot at Putnam and Grand. First, the New York Sun ran a big story by Brad Hope about the escalating problems on the corner that we thought did an excellent job of framing the historical problems as well as the current resolve of community members to solve them. (As it is subscription only, we provide the entire text on the jump.) At the same time, as detailed at greater length over on the Brooklyn Record, members of the 88th Precinct were closing off the block, posting fliers and parking themselves right outside the drug dealers’ doors. After all the lip service given to the topic at last week’s town hall meeting, we were certainly encouraged by the show of force. It shows that the police can marshall the resources when they want to (or if DA Hynes wants them to, as the case may be). As many readers who don’t live in the area may be disappointed to hear, we’re going to keep holding them accountable to the extent that we can. Let’s hope this is the start of a real sea change in action and attitude.
Addendum: We just heard from a reader who spoke to one of the cops this morning who told her they’ll be there for months! Go, cops. We’ll be sending over coffee and donuts. We suspect that DA Charles Hynes deserves a lot of credit for getting this moved up the priority list.
Police Pledge Crackdown in Clinton Hill [NY Sun]
By BRADLEY HOPE – Staff Reporter of the Sun
June 28, 2006
Responding to mounting community pressure in Clinton Hill, the 88th precinct is today launching an initiative to clean up quality-of-life crimes on the Grand Avenue corridor, sources said yesterday. One of the hot spots police will target is the corner of Putnam and Grand avenues – a dusty triangle between the neighborhood’s streets of ancient mansions and brownstones, where neighbors said drug dealers openly make hand-to-hand trades and gamblers play illegal dice games. At the beginning of June the spot had its first slaying in three years, which has served as a rallying call for the neighborhood in recent weeks.
Though crime in the area is down significantly in all the major crime categories during the last decade, the Brooklyn neighborhood has already seen four slayings this year, according to Compstat reports. There were no murders last year. Reports of rape, burglary, felony assault, and grand larceny are also up slightly from the same period last year. Shooting incidents have risen to 12 this year from six last year, the reports show.
“It’s a complete open-air drug market that everyone is aware of,” a Clinton Hill resident and local business owner who would be identified only as Karl said. “There are drug dropoffs every morning. There are bicycle delivery people that you continually see riding about. You just avoid that corner.”
The neighborhood complaints culminated last week with a meeting hosted by Concerned Residents of Grand Avenue, where the 88th precinct’s commanding officer, Captain John Cosgrove, and the Brooklyn District Attorney, Charles Hynes, appeared. Captain Cosgrove told the audience that several dozen of the precinct’s officers had been moved to other more problematic precincts in the borough, making it harder to fight the qualityof-life crimes on street corners, according to a report of the meeting at Brownstoner.com. Mr. Hynes said he would pay special attention to the block.
The precinct¹s new initiative will likely involve flooding the Grand Avenue corridor with police officers, sources said. Community organizers are pushing for surveillance cameras to be installed in crime hot spots. “There is high unemployment at that corner, so unfortunately individuals believe the best recourse is for them to engage in the drug trade,” the neighborhood’s City Council member, Letitia James, said. ³It¹s also the fastest and quickest way for them to get incarcerated.”
Using the nuisance abatement law, the city is also trying to close down the Lefferts Hotel, a source of community complaints about illegal activity, Ms. James said. A manager of the hotel declined to comment. A former president of the Grand Avenue block association was allegedly threatened by drug dealers to stop his campaign to clean up the neighborhood several years ago, leading him to quit his post and the association to fold, an organizer and local resident, Stephanie Gillette, said. With renewed interest in the problem, Ms. Gillette said she hoped the authorities would make a long-term commitment to the problem. “There has been a lot of lip service in the past,” she said.
That makes no sense. Isn’t an IP address specific to a particular computer? If so, then those posts could not be from the same IP address (well, not unless people are breaking into my apartment when I’m not hear and posting to Brownstoner.com).
We should have been more specific. Those four posts were from the same IP address. As for why we examined it, we usually try to look more closely at the source of comments when they are rude or inflammatory. Calling people “racist crackers” qualifies.
Brownstoner, may I ask why you would bother to examine Darrell’s post with such scrutiny? It’s your blog and you can do whatever you want, of course; but it looks ‘funny’ that you’d go after these posts…i.e., it looks like you subjected them to special scrutiny simply because you don’t like their content.
I would urge you to check again. I have posted under no other name than my own.
FYI, Darrell, Douglas, Anon 8:08 and Anon 9:00 (7/2) are all the same person. Please stick to one name–all you do is undermine your position by resorting to multiple personalities.
This is ridiculous. To think that black people don’t want the crime cleaned up, especially since it also benefits white people, is absurd. To defend such a position is the same as agreeing with the equally absurd notion many black kids(and their parents) have that it isn’t cool to do well in school, and that you aren’t really “black” if you speak standard English, succeed academically, and go on to higher education.
We need to stop worrying about the white folks and their ulterior motives, and start fixing our priorities and attitudes. I disagree with many of the conservative social opinions of Brown Bomber, but he is 100% correct on this issue, and in his intolerance for this kind of crime. He also doesn’t need anonymous people telling him he’s not really black, who the hell are any of us to define someone we’ve never even met? What is “black”?
Drug dealing and drug use should not have a black face always attached to it. The “pharmacutical entrepeneurs” in our midst need to go. They are not glamorous, or urban survivors, or rapping heroes who have beaten the Man. They are criminals who are a blight on our communities. Nothing more.
For what it’s worth, we’ve already spoken with three of our black neighbors about the police presence and they’re thrilled, so you can stop your race baiting. No one has yet offered a credible explanation for why a black parent would not be in favor of removing the drug dealers.
And black parents don’t want the same thing?
Thanks, Douglas. That’s a much more thoughtful response. In the end, though, you can’t really blame people for wanting to make the street that their children have to walk down everyday a safer place. That’s hardly racist. It’s called being a good parent. You’re right, though, that the drug dealers will just relocate somewhere else.