When is a Job Done?
I’ve been researching a Coop’s construction history and have noticed that although there have been many permitted jobs over the years they are rarely “signed off” on. On the “application details” page “last action” usually indicated PERMIT ISSUED and nothing further. Some do indicate “signed off” (usually PROFESSIONALLY CERTIFIED) and I’m wondering if the majority…
I’ve been researching a Coop’s construction history and have noticed that although there have been many permitted jobs over the years they are rarely “signed off” on. On the “application details” page “last action” usually indicated PERMIT ISSUED and nothing further. Some do indicate “signed off” (usually PROFESSIONALLY CERTIFIED) and I’m wondering if the majority that have not been signed off are still open obviously at some risk by the DOB for further scrutiny?
Hard to tell. According to the building code when an application is signed off that is when your job is complete. Since an open alteraton type2 or 3 in general does not affect the existing c. of o. a lot of applications remain open just because why close it. The DOB has recently stepped up efforts to mandat the signoffs within 12 months of completion or reports to be filed whn more time is required. In addition, reports must officially be filed within 30 days of inspection. However, not all open applications are actually being filed just because why go for the headache. I can check it out for ou if you email me the address or specific application. sometimes there are worktypes or other issues besides the required items. myemail is brooklynexpediter@gmail.com
LPC sign off is not required for every project. They aren’t entirely consistent, but usually they only sign off on CofA permits or when asked to do so by DOB (typically when there is a change of use).
Thanks Jock and vinca. Yes the “items required” seems to be the key. Usually a final cost affidavit and a landmarks sign off is needed BUT some obliviously involve sub-permits such as “bolt schedules”, welding and even WC or disability evidence.
Thanks again
This is usually because the contractor never pulled or closed up the sub-permits, ie. plumbing/mechanical. It is not in the architects interest not to close out the project. Otherwise, maybe the contractor may have built otherwise than per the plans and the architect could not correct it to legally close out the project.
Can’t say in your situation, but I know that this has been the source of massive headaches for me in a multifamily dwelling. Check the permit dates and see whether they’ve expired. Also check to find whatever remains open on the “Items Required” link(s) of application overview(s). But much better to start by reviewing the details with whoever filed the application, or an expediter or architect you know, use, trust. Might want to do both, and see how their observations differ.