Zoning and Roof Construction
Hi there, We am writing to try to get some information/assistance related to interpretation of the City’s zoning code. This is for an R-7 district (no front yard setback required, residential). In the City’s zoning code for this type of district there are certain limitations on building height (as to be expected). This is controlled…
Hi there,
We am writing to try to get some information/assistance related to interpretation of the City’s zoning code. This is for an R-7 district (no front yard setback required, residential).
In the City’s zoning code for this type of district there are certain limitations on building height (as to be expected). This is controlled using setbacks and the sky exposure plane. For R7 there are two codes that apply. In the first scenario (Article 2 Chapter 3 Section 63-2), new construction of additional structures must be set back from building street walls (20 feet). From this the sky exposure plane is also set. In the second scenario (Article 2 Chapter 3 Section 64), there are different regulations that say if there is a front setback (minimum 15 feet) then there is not a max building height but rather a sky exposure plane that cannot be penetrated that starts a certain distance (60 feet) up from the street.
There is also the ‘Sliver Law’ which regulates narrow buildings to max heights. However, within this there is a clause that states if there are directly abutting buildings with heights above 60 feet then you can construct to the lower of these max heights.
We are looking to purchase an apartment with roof rights. The abutting buildings have roof construction above the building front. However, the Sliver Law only ‘supersedes’ the second scenario. So under the first scenario, there would be a required setback from the front streetwall (which we could not do because it would encroach upon part of the roof that is not ours).
So our questions are:
1) How do we know if the building falls into the second scenario? There is a setback from the curb but not for the whole lot line because there are brownstone stairs up to the first floor. The City’s yard code says stairs are a permitted obstruction but only to the first level above the basement (Article 2 Chapter 3 Section 44). In brownstones that is confusing because the garden apartment is below the street level but the first floor is definitely more than one story above the basement.
2) If stairs are permitted, where is the setback measured from? The code says perpendicular to the front lot line and the corresponding figure is from the street but it seems this would actually be from the sidewalk.
3) If the building falls into the first scenario (Sliver Law does not supersede) and there are abutting buildings over the max height under the first scenario (but constructed before the max height zoning code was set) can we go over 60 feet within the required setback if the additional structure does not penetrate the sky exposure plane?
Apologies for the long (and somewhat convoluted) post. We love the apartment and plan to purchase it but are trying to get an idea of our post-purchase expansion options.
Thanks for the time to read the post — comments from those with experience are very much appreciated!!
If you are able to provide me with a little more information, I may be able to answer your question. Feel free to contact me at td1266 at gmail dot com
Oh man it is not even as confusing as can be as there is much much more that can be confusing. This is only another verification to the fact that the NYC zoning resolution was not written in the language of plain english.
Anyway, There are a lot of issues and very complicated. the setback from the front that you referenced in a non-quality housing building is only hypothetical and your height regulations really depend under which article you will use for floor area and in addition if there is a letter suffix (R7A, R7B)then quality houdsing is mandatory.
When discussing all your options it is better to get a full analysis and full feasibility study done by a proffessional architect or enginner.
You will need a site survey and preferably an architectural survey not just a title survey.
Oh man it is not even as confusing as can be as there is much much more that can be confusing. This is only another verification to the fact that the NYC zoning resolution was not written in the language of plain english.
Anyway, There are a lot of issues and very complicated. the setback from the front that you referenced in a non-quality housing building is only hypothetical and your height regulations really depend under which article you will use for floor area and in addition if there is a letter suffix (R7A, R7B)then quality houdsing is mandatory.
When discussing all your options it is better to get a full analysis and full feasibility study done by a proffessional architect or enginner.
You will need a site survey and preferably an architectural survey not just a tite survey.
Oh man it is not even as confusing as can be as there is much much more that can be confusing. This is only another verification to the fact that the NYC zoning resolution was not written in the language of plain english.
Anyway, There are a lot of issues and very complicated. the setback from the front that you referenced in a non-quality housing building is only hypothetical and your height regulations really depend under which article you will use for floor area and in addition if there is a letter suffix (R7A, R7B)then quality houdsing is mandatory.
When discussing all your options it is better to get a full analysis and full feasibility study done by a proffessional architect or enginner.
You will need a site survey and preferably an architectural survey not just a titke survey.
You really need a zoning feasibility study conducted. That takes time and money. Either an architect or a zoning consulant can do that for you.