Our house was once an SRO and has a sprinkler system throughout that looks about 50 years old. It’s pretty ugly but my boyfriend thinks it might also be pretty useful in a fire and that since we have it, we should keep it. I have a hard time picturing a beautifully restored house with these ugly pipes all around. Also, we don’t even know if it works! Does anyone have a similar tale, and if so, where did you start?


Comments

  1. You can recess the pipes and the sprinkler heads. The “heads” are then hidden can covered with a white cap….it is a sleeker look for an ugy but safe system

  2. If your place isn’t required to have a sprinkler (1-2 family), but you have one, do you still need to have monthly inspections? Who inspects them and what does it cost?

  3. If I ever did a new-build house or if I gutted and rebuilt the inside of a large old structure, I would add a sprinkler system. It doesn’t keep a house from burning down but it allows people to get out safely. I would be open to adding it to our brownstone now even though it’s only a 2-story one-family. Maybe one spray nozzle coming out of the wall directly over the stairwell, outside the bathroom where there already is plumbing. Something like that.

  4. Keep it: inspect it: have it serviced: make it as appealing as possible.

    In the history of the world there has never been a multiple fatality fire in a building with working sprinklers.

  5. Sprinklers must be inspected monthly at your cost under the new city regulations. Also sprinklers do not prevent your house from being damaged in a fire, they merely provide a safe path for people to exit.

  6. town houses have a sprinkler system if they are 3-family or more and DO NOT have 2 means of egress (exit).

    If your house is a legal 3-family or more, you mean need to keep it.

    But please have it inspected and updated, it you decide to keep it.

1 2