Windows-New Construction vs. Replacement
Our contractor has advised us that replacement windows installed by most of the Window companies will not be securely attached to the building and therefore will most likely move and not work properly. He thinks that buying Marvins for replacement is foolhardy-like taking expensive cloth to a cheap tailor. He recommends going with a lower…
Our contractor has advised us that replacement windows installed by most of the Window companies will not be securely attached to the building and therefore will most likely move and not work properly. He thinks that buying Marvins for replacement is foolhardy-like taking expensive cloth to a cheap tailor. He recommends going with a lower line of windows for replacement and a higher line for new construction. I would appreciate any thoughts on this.
Replacement windows are like everything else; a lot depends on what you buy.
There are very good wooden replacement windows like Pella and Anderson Renewal. There are also some very good welded vinyl replacement windows out there. A good source to help choose windows is http://hubpages.com/hub/vinyl-replacement-windows
Wooden windows are more historical for certain homes and vinyl is low maintainance. Wood windows cost more but can also be more effort to take care of. Some companies will also offer a vinyl or aluminum clad exterior with a wooden interior that can be stained to match existing woodwork.
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
Thank you all for your responses. I now feel more confident going with replacement windows-Pella or Marvins.
All replacement windows are made to order, each window should be made for one specific opening, even if the openings look identical you would be surpirsed how much they actually vary, especially in hundred-plus year old buildings.
Like everything else, you get what you pay for. Buying cheap-o replacement windows is a huge mistake. Go with Marvin, or Pella, or Kolbe & Kolbe. Avoid the brand X units, they usually come with brand X installers.
Guest 11:33 here, I forgot to mention that our original frames are in very good condition and I watched them install the windows, the fit was perfect, they were made to order.
If the original frames are in very poor conditions and warped out of true, then I agree it’s penny-wise and pound-foolish to replace the windows only. In those circumstances I disagree with the first response and would advise brick-to-brick replacement where you get new frames (custom-made and installed to fit the openings) and new windows. Due to inexperience and budget constraints during our original renovation, we went with the former option for several of our windows. Subsequently, we chose Marvin brick-to-brick windows and — while the cost is very high — we are much happier with both the performance and appearance.
I’ve had replacement windows in my house since about 1978. The only maintanance they’ve required is to replace several of the spring balances and even that wasn’t needed until they were over 20 years old.
We just redid all of our windows in our brownstone; before doing it we heard arguments for both replacement and new construction. We have a lot of original details in the house and were told we might have a lot of damage if we did the “brick to brick†new construction method. Also, we had stained glass above all the windows. I think your contractor is wrong about the windows moving; go with the best one you can afford, better windows will allow for better insulation. From what I gather, “new construction†should only be done in new construction. We love our replacement windows, and they happen to be Marvins!