What's Your Take? Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

  1. To repeat from Sept. 22
    http://bstoner.wpengine.com/brownstoner/archives/2010/09/wednesday_links_247.php#comments

    Big Jugs = scurrilous

    As for Brownstoner’s comments policy, well, consider:
    http://www.ajr.org/Article.asp?id=4878
    The practice of allowing anonymous comments on online news sites has always been problematic. For years newspapers have insisted that letters to the editor be accompanied by the actual name of the actual person who wrote them. The thinking was that if you want to make some bold statements, you ought to be willing to take responsibility for them.

    Similarly, many news outlets have codes and policies barring blind attack quotes in their news columns.

    But when they embraced the freewheeling world of the Internet, news organizations switched gears. Want to take some shots while wearing a cloak of confidentiality? No problem.

  2. I’m not sure why the Observer is wasting space on Norman “OCD” Oder. Even more confusing is why Oder quit a stable job to write a book that few people will buy, let alone read (assuming that he ever finds a publisher willing to print it).