Shedding a Final Tear for Admirals Row



On the heels of Friday’s ceremony at which Senator Chuck Schumer formally celebrated the handing over of control of Admirals Row to the city, Mr. Forgotten New York sends in this old photo of Building D, which is slated for demolition as part of a plan to bring a supermarket to this end of Flushing Avenue. (Building B, in the background, is the one former residence that is to be preserved. If you’re interested in seeing what kind of shape the interior of that building is in, check out this RFP. Lots of fascinating photos.) RIP.

By Brownstoner | | Comment

Hope For Two Admiral’s Row Buildings?



At the Community Board 2 public hearing about plans for the redevelopment of Admiral’s Row a couple weeks ago, Navy Yard Development Corporation President Andrew Kimball was vague on the question of whether two of the historic buildings on the site can be preserved, but he was more confident about the matter at another hearing in front of Borough President Marty Markowitz last week, according to the Eagle. The paper reports that “Kimball…spoke of a commitment to historic preservation, noting that Building B and the Timber Shed — said to be the last of its kind in the nation — will be preserved and incorporated into the planned development.” Earlier this year the National Guard said both buildings were beyond repair. At the hearing last week Kimball also said that there’s been a lot of interest in the industrial space that’s going to be built above the supermarket as part of the redevelopment.
Support Seems Imminent for Admirals Row Development [Eagle]
Details Aired About Admiral’s Row Redevelopment [Brownstoner]

By Gabby | | Comment

What’s Next for the Tobacco Warehouse?



A judge’s ruling last week that Dumbo’s Tobacco Warehouse must remain under the designation of federal parkland was a death blow for arts organization St. Ann’s Warehouse, which had been planning to redevelop the space, but it also raised questions about how the waterfront property will be used in the future, as an article in The Journal explores. According to the story, it’s likely that the warehouse will still be “semi-public” for the time being, but Regina Myer, president of the Brooklyn Bridge Park Corp., which oversees the warehouses, says the organization is still looking into what to do with it in the long term. Jane McGroarty, president of the Brooklyn Heights Association, one of the community groups that sued over the warehouse’s transfer, says the following: “Frankly I think there are a lot of people who think that the Tobacco Warehouse should remain without a roof and as a public space.” The story also notes that possible future uses envisioned by community groups include a performance space and skating rink.
Ruling Leaves Unclear Path [WSJ]
It’s Official: No St. Ann’s for Tobacco Warehouse [Brownstoner]
Photo by Listen Missy!

By Gabby | | Comment

Closing Bell: Mary Whalen OK’d for Nat’l Register


27marywhalen.jpg
The state has determined that the Mary A. Whalen, the oil tanker built in 1938 that’s docked in the Red Hook container port, is eligible for inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. PortSide New York applied for the vessel’s inclusion on the National Register and the NYS Office of Parks, Recreation and Historic Preservation deemed it eligible, in part, because of its significance “in the area of historic marine technology as an intact and representative example of a motorized coastal and harbor tanker/lighter from the 1930s.” PortSide notes that it applied for the tanker to be listed because a “major national funder” has approached the group about supporting its restoration with a new grant, but it needed to be either a city landmark or on the National Register to be eligible for the money. Exciting stuff!
Mary A. Whalen Gets New and National Recognition! [PortSide Mary Whalen] GMAP

By Gabby | | Comment

Pols Addressing Admirals Row Preservation Again


admiralsrowthumb52011.jpgPoliticians are once again pushing for the preservation of Admirals Row, with Rep. Nydia M. Velázquez writing a letter to Army Secretary John McHugh requesting that the National Guard “immediately” hand the property over to the city, according to an article in today’s Wall Street Journal. The letter, which was also signed by Sen. Charles E. Schumer, Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand, and Rep. Edolphus Towns, follows news that the National Guard had determined that the Timber Shed and Building B—the two Admirals Row properties that were supposed to be preserved as part of the Navy Yard Development Corp’s designs for the site—had deteriorated beyond the point of no return. The letter also says that the $2 million allocated to the Army Corps of Engineers a couple years ago for the preservation of the buildings should immediately be used to try and stabilize Building B. In March, Schumer and Gillibrand wrote a letter to McHugh requesting that Navy Yard officials be allowed on the site to try and make emergency repairs to the Timber Shed and Building B. The Army has said that it has to go through the proper paces of environmental and historic review before transferring Admirals Row to the city, which is then expected to hand the property over to the Navy Yard Development Corp.
Plea for Navy Yard Fix [WSJ]
Fed Agency: Admirals Row Situation ‘Inexplicable’ [Brownstoner]
None of Admiral’s Row Buildings Salvageable? [Brownstoner]

By Gabby | | Comment

Fed Agency: Admirals Row Situation ‘Inexplicable’



In a letter dated yesterday, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, a federal agency that’s acted as a consultant to the Army National Guard with reference to Admirals Row, said the agency is “troubled by the recent turn of events” at the row, particularly the National Guard’s recent assertion that Building B cannot be stabilized. The letter has some strong words about how “it is inexplicable that the NY District did not complete the stabilization of Building B” before this winter and notes that the National Guard transferred $2 million to the guard’s NY District two years ago “for the express purpose of stabilizing Building B and the Timber Shed.” (The district has also said that the Timber Shed, the Admirals Row structure aside from Building B that was supposed to be preserved, has deteriorated beyond repair.) Click through to read the letter in its entirety.
Letter via HDC’s Facebook. (more…)

By Gabby | | Comment

Closing Bell: Grassroots Preservation Awards


On Thursday the Historic Districts Council is having its annual Grassroots Preservation Awards, and this year one of the honorees is the Queen of Victorian Flatbush real estate, Mary Kay Gallagher. A bunch of other worthies are also being honored, like The Architect’s Newspaper for its coverage of development and preservation issues; the Central Queens Historical Society for its advocacy for preservation in neighborhoods like Kew Gardens, Jamaica, and Richmond Hill; and the Prospect Cemetery Association for its dedication to preserving and restoring the Jamaica cemetery. The event is taking place in the garden of Plymouth Church of the Pilgrims at 75 Hicks Street; more info here.

By Gabby | | Comment

None of Admiral’s Row Buildings Salvageable?



Here’s the latest in depressing Admiral’s Row news: According to Fort Greene-Clinton Hill Patch, last week the National Guard sent a letter to local politicians telling them Building B has been deemed beyond repair, which means the Guard has washed its hands of one of only two buildings on the row that were supposed to be preserved. In February, the National Guard said the other building that was supposed to be salvaged, the Timber Shed, was also too far gone to be preserved. According to last week’s letter, one of Building B’s walls has partially collapsed and is unstable. Thus, the Navy Guard is not going to make any moves to preserve either building while it has custodianship of the row; as noted last week, it’s unclear when the Navy Yard Development Corporation will be able to take control of the row and, in the meantime, the Development Corp. is not allowed to access the buildings in order to try and preserve them.
National Guard Backs Out of Preserving Any of Admiral’s Row [FG Patch]
Admiral’s Row Preservation: Still Stymied [Brownstoner]
CB2 Also Calls for Timber Shed Preservation [Brownstoner]
Preservation Groups Sound Admirals Row Alarm [Brownstoner]
Is Admiral’s Row Timber Shed Beyond Repair? [Brownstoner]
BREAKING: Admiral’s Row Renderings Released [Brownstoner]
Timber Shed Gets Reinforced [Brownstoner]
Timber Shed Might Not Be Saved After All [Brownstoner]
It’s Curtains for Most of Admiral’s Row [Brownstoner]

By Gabby | | Comment

Admiral’s Row Preservation: Still Stymied



The Times has an update on the frustrating saga involving the will-it-or-won’t-it happen preservation of a couple Admiral’s Row buildings at the Navy Yard. The story notes that the National Guard, which has control of Admiral’s Row until a historical and environmental review is complete and it can be transfered to the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation, won’t allow the Navy Yard corporation to make even minimal efforts to try and preserve the buildings. Here’s the rub: “The National Guard has not even permitted the Navy Yard corporation to enter the grounds for such elementary and relatively inexpensive measures as boarding up the broken doors and windows of the timber shed and Quarters B with plywood or covering them with tarpaulins to protect them from rain and snow. The Guard contends that any efforts to sustain the building could endanger workers.” The Navy Yard corporation and preservationists are, of course, frustrated by the National Guard’s stance. The article says it’s unclear when the necessary reviews of the site will be complete so that it can finally be transfered. Last month a bunch of politicians and Community Board 2 called for Navy Yard officials to have access to Admiral’s Row in order to make emergency repairs to the two buildings, but that appears to have come to nought.
A Battle Over Preservation in a Strip Once Worthy of Admirals [NY Times]
CB2 Also Calls for Timber Shed Preservation [Brownstoner]
Preservation Groups Sound Admirals Row Alarm [Brownstoner]
Is Admiral’s Row Timber Shed Beyond Repair? [Brownstoner]
BREAKING: Admiral’s Row Renderings Released [Brownstoner]
Timber Shed Gets Reinforced [Brownstoner]
Timber Shed Might Not Be Saved After All [Brownstoner]
It’s Curtains for Most of Admiral’s Row [Brownstoner]

By Gabby | | Comment

CB2 Also Calls for Timber Shed Preservation



Earlier this week Sens. Schumer and Gillibrand wrote to Secretary of the Army John McHugh saying that Navy Yard officials should be allowed to have access to Admiral’s Row in order to make emergency repairs to the Timber Shed and Building B, and yesterday Community Board 2 joined the chorus. According to City Room, CB Chairman John Dew sent a letter to the army outlining “the board’s disappointment that there are no plans in the document to stabilize the Timber Shed, the last structure of its type in the United States.” Last month there was word that the army had determined that the Timber Shed was beyond repair and should be demolished despite plans to preserve the structure and Building B if the Navy Yard ends up redeveloping the site. The City Room story notes that the likely transfer of Admiral’s Row to the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation still needs to be agreed upon in writing by the National Guard Bureau, the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation and the New York State Office of Parks, Recreation and Historical Preservation, and after that the site still needs to go through an environmental review that probably won’t be finished until September.
CB2 Weighs in on Admirals Row Preservation [The Local]
Sens. Schumer & Gillibrand Pitch in to Save Admiral’s Row’ Buildings [Daily News]
Photo by Barry Yanowitz.

By Gabby | | Comment

Preservationists Celebrate Bed-Stuy, Gowanus



Via the Brooklyn Eagle comes word that Bedford-Stuyvesant and Gowanus are the two Brooklyn neighborhoods named in a Historic Districts Council program called “Six to Celebrate.” According to the Council, the initiative identifies six areas in the city “that merit preservation as priorities for HDC’s advocacy and consultation over a yearlong period.” HDC notes the following re: Bed-Stuy: “Although there are currently two designated historic districts in the area, the vast majority of Bedford Stuyvesant’s architectural splendor is unprotected. The recently-formed Bedford Stuyvesant Society for Historic Preservation, a coalition of concerned neighborhood block associations, and the landmarks committee of Brooklyn Community Board 3 are working to correct that.” And the citation about Gowanus, a slice of which is pictured above, says: “In recent years, plans for the canal have conflicted with the existing character of the neighborhood and some significant industrial structures have been demolished for out-of-scale, out of character, speculative development. However, with the canal’s recent designation as a federal Superfund site, there is now an opportunity to successfully advocate for the preservation of the industrial character of the area and retention of significant structures associated with this history.” Agree that these are two neighborhoods in Brooklyn that warrant some of the most attention from preservationists?
6 to Celebrate [HDC]
Bedford-Stuyvesant, Gowanus on 2010 List [BK Eagle]

By Gabby | | Comment

Preservation Groups Sound Admirals Row Alarm



Although the Timber Shed and Building B are set to be preserved and restored by the Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corporation, the transfer of Admirals Row from the U.S. Army National Guard Bureau could take a year or more. Given the Federal Government’s track record of inaction in recent decades, two New York City preservation groups are calling for special measures to be taken to ensure that the buildings don’t decay beyond the point of no return in the meantime. The Municipal Art Society is deeply concerned that a heavy snow this winter could cause irreparable damage to the Timber Shed, said Vin Cipolla, president of MAS. The Timber Shed, which once housed wooden ship masts, is the only remaining building of its type in the nation, and it is of exceptional national significance. Once stabilized, the building is imminently reusable and would contribute tremendously to the sense of place and urban design of this development project. The New York Landmarks Conservancy couldn’t agree more. “The National Guard has been woefully negligent of its duty and promises to stabilize and preserve the Timber Shed,” said Peg Breen, the Conservancy’s president. “Now that preservation engineer Robert Silman has determined that the building can be stabilized and eventually reused,” she added,” the National Guard must protect the Shed from potential damage this winter.”

By Brownstoner | | Comment

Reimagining the Coney Bank Building



The Bank of Coney Island, a neo-classical building at 1124 Surf Avenue, is slated for demolition by Thor Equities. The group Save Coney Island, which has fought tirelessly against Thor’s development plans, came up with this rendering to imagine its restoration. “The Bank of Coney Island could be restored and re-purposed as a Bowery-Ballroom-style event space, says spokesman Juan Rivero. This would not only preserve one of Coney’s most attractive and historic structures, but also give new life to the amusement area and contribute to its revitalization. Thor hasn’t expressed any interest in the building’s preservation, and obtained a demolition permit in August.

By Emily | | Comment

Row of Old Fulton Buildings At Risk



Back in April, the Department of Buildings issued a Full Vacate Orders for 11, 13 and 15 Old Fulton Street. Earlier this week, DumboNYC reported that a Vacate Order was also issued at 9 Fulton Street, an empty lot with only the traces of a single-story facade; the lot has been used of late for outdoor dining by the restaurant at 7 Old Fulton Street. The orders could be paving the way for the buildings to be demolished, a turn of events sure to dismay preservationists. From DumboNYC:

A source close to the situation told us that 11-15 Old Fulton are going through the process of what is called demolition by neglect, which means that the City is trying to compel the owner of these buildings to maintain the property so that they do not deteriorate to the point where they will have to be demolished. Allowing buildings like this to deteriorate to that point is a tactic sometimes used by landlowners who deem it cost-ineffective to renovate the existing structure, and who would prefer to raze the building and start over.

The owner of 9 Fulton Street has already applied to demolish the existing one-story facade to make room for a new four-story structure.
Three Old Fulton Buildings May Have To Be Demo’d [Brooklyn Eagle]
Full Vacate Order at 9 Old Fulton Street [DumboNYC]
Vacate Order on 11-15 Old Fulton Street [DumboNYC]

By Brownstoner | | Comment

Brownsville Church Saved from Wrecking Ball


After many months, a coalition of community members and preservationists have won a battle to save an historic church in Brownsville. The Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn had shuttered the Lady of Loreto Church at 124 Sackman Street two years ago, and last year announced plans to allow a non-profit developer to tear it down and build 102 affordable apartments in its place. Under a compromise plan, the church will now be saved and turned into a community center and only 50 apartments will be built. “It’s a toned-down plan,” said Charles Piazza, 57, who helped lead the preservation fight as a member of Italian Americans for Preservation and Community. “But at least we have saved the church.” Director of the Brownsville Heritage Center, Patricia Deans, who worked with Piazza to convince the Diocese not to demolish the church, said, “It means we’re going to finally serve the needs of the community.”
Brownsville Community Saves Our Lady of Loreto Church [NY Daily News]
A Reprieve for Historic Brownsville Church [Brownstoner]
Lady of Loreto’s Most Desperate Hour [Brownstoner]
Fight to Preserve Ocean Hill Church [Brownstoner]
Photo from NYLC

By Brownstoner | | Comment

More Pleadings for Coney Buildings


The Landmarks Preservation Committee recently told the preservation group Save Coney Island that their proposed historic district would not be referred to the full commission for consideration. In response, eleven New York historians have signed a letter still urging that the buildings be saved from Joe Sitt’s wrecking ball. The full letter is after the jump. Something must be done to prevent the demolition of the buildings,” says historian Michael Immerso. “Mayor Bloomberg should immediately intervene.
A Push Toward Preservation in Coney Island [Brownstoner]
Sit Disses Coney Island’s Historic Buildings [Brownstoner]
The Gutting of the Henderson Begins [Brownstoner]
Thor Reveals Soulless Vision for Surf Ave. [Brownstoner]
Tor and City Close on Coney Deal [Brownstoner] (more…)

By Emily | | Comment

A Push Toward Preservation in Coney Island



On the heels of Joe Sitt’s statement that the old buildings in Coney Island are “just horrible, rundown relics with nothing exciting about them, the preservationist group Save Coney Island has released renderings of what two of Coney Island’s historical buildings could become if they were preserved, restored, and reused. Among the threatened buildings are the Glasshorn, Henderson’s Music Hall (Save Coney Island’s rendering pictured above, compared with Sitt’s below), the Shore Hotel, and the Coney Island Bank. While the group fully supports the opening of Luna Park, they are racing against the clock to establish a Coney Island Historic District to protect these buildings from Thor’s wrecking ball. These historic buildings could be the foundation for a spectacular and unique 21st century Coney Island, said Save Coney Island spokesman Juan Rivero. But for that too happen we need to think more creatively about the enormous potential of Coney’s built legacy.
Save Landmarks of Coney Island from Cyclone Sitt [NY Daily News]
Sitt Disses Coney’s Historical Buildings [Brownstoner]
The Gutting of the Henderson Begins [Brownstoner]
Thor Reveals Soulless Vision for Surf Ave. [Brownstoner]
Thor and City Close on Coney Deal [Brownstoner]

By Emily | | Comment

A Closer Look at Admiral’s Row



A couple of weeks ago, we reported on a meeting about the preservability of Admiral’s Row — and shared our concern about the historical buildings there that may be deemed unsalvageable. A piece in the New York Times this weekend offers more details on the buildings in the Navy Yard that were “largely left to rot,” paying special attention to the timber shed, which “was once used to repair masts of large sailing vessels.” It’s the last building of its kind in the U.S., but engineers have found that it might be “beyond repair.”

The Times spoke with Kristin Leahy, cultural resources manager for the National Guard Bureau, but they didn’t get much of an update: “Another analysis of the site by the National Guard Bureau, which still controls the site, should be complete in coming weeks, she said; all options will then be on the table again.” In the meantime, some photos of the site (including the one we’ve shared here) have been posted on the blog Discovering/Losing Admiral’s Row.

Timber Shed Might Not Be Saved After All
[Brownstoner]
It’s Curtains for Most of Admiral’s Row [Brownstoner]
The Struggle to Preserve the Brooklyn Navy Yard [NY Times]

By Kara | | Comment

A Reprieve for Historic Brownsville Church


In a surprise move, it appears that the Catholic Diocese has decided to spare the Lady of Loreto church from the wrecking ball. While the church has yet to issue a formal statement, The Daily News reported on Friday that a compromise has been reached that would avoid demolition. The decision comes after months of negotiations with a preservationist group comprised largely of Italian Americans that sought to save a piece of its cultural heritage that has fallen into disuse as the neighborhood has transformed over recent decades to a largely black community. The Catholic Church had been planning to tear down the turn of the century structure to make way for 88 units of affordable housing. Under the new preservation plan, the church will be preserved, possibly as some kind of community center, and 50 or so affordable apartments would be built. “It’s a toned-down plan but at least we have saved the church,” said Charles Piazza, who’s led the preservation fight. “There are a lot of conversations taking place but there have been no decisions,” said Msgr. Kieran Harrington, a Brooklyn Diocese spokesman.
Brownsville Community Saves Church from Demolition [NY Daily News]
Lady of Loreto’s Most Desperate Hour [Brownstoner]
Fight to Preserve Ocean Hill Church [Brownstoner]
Photo from Loretochurch.com

By Brownstoner | | Comment

Heights Project Wins Preservation Award



The Lucy G. Moses Preservation Awards were handed out by the The New York Landmarks Conservancy in a ceremony at The Natural History Museum on Wednesday night. Only one residential project received a nod this year: Brooklyn Heights-based architect Tom van den Bout was honored for the restoration of 36 Grace Court. At one time covered in a modern metal facade, the house was immaculately restored to original brownstone form between November 2008 and July of 2009. (Kelly Construction was the contractor.) For a look at what the house looked like pre-renovation, check out MyHomeBrooklyn, where the story was originally reported.
van den Bout Wins An Oscar [MyHomeBrooklyn]

By Brownstoner | | Comment