Forum

« Boiler troubles railing parts »

February 3, 2009

Oil to Gas Conversion: Questions


I hope answers to these questions, from Master Plumber and others on this forum, could guide us and anyone else considering an oil to gas conversion.

We’re looking at such a conversion this spring for the steam-heat system in our 1914 attached, single-family brick house .

1) How does a plumber determine the size of the gas furnace needed? What should I expect them to check during a visit to provide an estimate?

2) How does a plumber determine if a chimney liner is needed with a new furnace? If a new liner is needed, should the property owner first contract with a chimney specialist to have this work done?

3) Since the conversion will likely requirement some movement of asbestos covered pipes connected to the existing boiler, should a property owner first contract with an asbestos-abatement specialist to remove the pipe wrapping, before working with a heating contractor?

4) Can the plumbing contractor also remove the un-needed oil tank? Or, again, should an owner contact a separate company for this work after the oil line is disconnected.

5) Should a plumbing contractor be responsible for any necessary permits and/or contact with Keyspan aka National Grid?

6) In this house, the existing oil burner is partially enclosed in a closet constructed of wood-frame and gypsum board. The front of this closet is fully opened, allowing the face plate of the oil burner to be removed for cleaning and maintenance. Am I correct that such an enclosure now violates the NYC building code? Does the owner need to remove this enclosure before contracting with a plumber?

7) How can an oil furnace be enclosed in a basement that may be used in the future as a living area? Does the furnace require specific clearances on ALL sides either for maintenance access and/or building code requirements? Are removable metal screens (such as larger version of radiator covers) an option to enclose the furnace?

Thanks in advance for your replies.

Comments

Hello, I don't have the answers to all of your questions but here goes:
I converted from oil-to-gas 3-4 months ago (2-fam brownstone, age: OLD) and used National Grid for the conversion. They removed the old oil tank (I probably wouldn't use a company that didn't take care of this step) and also removed two old boilers. Their prices were substantially less than that of the plumbing contractors that I called. They also took care of all of the permits necessary for the work.
I used Abatek Corp. for the asbestos abatement. They are EPA (?) licensed per the DOB website and their prices were actually better than the vendor that National Grid recommended.
Unfortunately I also had to have my chimney relined. I believe it was an additional $3-3500 from the referred vendor and that was the cheapest price that I found out of 3 estimates.

Hope this helps a bit. Good luck!

Posted by: bootsey78 at February 3, 2009 1:45 PM

bootsey - could you share the approximate price for the conversion only (i.e., what National Grid charged you)?

Posted by: i disagree at February 3, 2009 1:53 PM

I hope answers to these questions, from Master Plumber and others on this forum, could guide us and anyone else considering an oil to gas conversion.
We’re looking at such a conversion this spring for the steam-heat system in our 1914 attached, single-family brick house .
1) How does a plumber determine the size of the gas furnace needed? What should I expect them to check during a visit to provide an estimate?

MP:
In a steam-heating system, a plumber measures the surface area of all the radiators in the home and comes up with something called a number of Equivalent Direct Radiation (EDR). With boilers, the rate of production of steam is rated in terms of square feet. The EDR number must closely match the replacement boiler’s square feet of steam output.
The way NOT to do it? Put back the same size boiler that’s there now without doing an EDR calculation. Nine times out of ten that leads to the purchase and installation of an oversized boiler, and a 20-year commitment to inefficiency and breakdowns.


2) How does a plumber determine if a chimney liner is needed with a new furnace? If a new liner is needed, should the property owner first contract with a chimney specialist to have this work done?

MP:
In the case of replacing a new old-style cast iron boiler, such as any steam boiler, a “plumber” shouldn’t be determining this. I always advise my clients to seek the advice of a qualified chimney and flue specialist. A trained eye will recognize a breach in the old masonry or a compromise in structural integrity. It is a completely different skill set from the plumber’s and not something to guess at or experiment with.
In the case of a newer, high-efficiency boiler, you need a chimney liner or a dedicated PVC or aluminum flue. Masonry chimneys can not safely handle the corrosive vapors emitted by high-efficiency boilers. Your installer should coordinate with the chimney contractor to determine whose work gets done first.


3) Since the conversion will likely requirement some movement of asbestos covered pipes connected to the existing boiler, should a property owner first contract with an asbestos-abatement specialist to remove the pipe wrapping, before working with a heating contractor?

MP:
Yes. You’ll need to file an ACP-5 form certifying there is no asbestos in the work area anyway.


4) Can the plumbing contractor also remove the un-needed oil tank? Or, again, should an owner contact a separate company for this work after the oil line is disconnected.

MP:
Only companies certified, I believe by the DEP, to handle and transport fuel oil can legally drain and remove your tank. This company will also have the authority recognized by the FDNY to certify the tanks and their contents were removed safely in the event of a fire inspection. I don’t know any plumbers that carry this certification. Again, this is best handled by a qualified company that has trucks, cutting torches and pumps set up specifically for this purpose.


5) Should a plumbing contractor be responsible for any necessary permits and/or contact with Keyspan aka National Grid?

MP:
Yes.


6) In this house, the existing oil burner is partially enclosed in a closet constructed of wood-frame and gypsum board. The front of this closet is fully opened, allowing the face plate of the oil burner to be removed for cleaning and maintenance. Am I correct that such an enclosure now violates the NYC building code? Does the owner need to remove this enclosure before contracting with a plumber?

MP:
It depends entirely on the tolerances, clearances and venting requirements listed in the manufacturer’s specifications of each individual boiler. Some units are suitable for closet installations.
That said, an architect can tell you that multi-family buildings may require the boiler be set in a two-hour fire-rated mechanical room.


7) How can an oil furnace be enclosed in a basement that may be used in the future as a living area? Does the furnace require specific clearances on ALL sides either for maintenance access and/or building code requirements? Are removable metal screens (such as larger version of radiator covers) an option to enclose the furnace?

MP:
See 6.

Good luck with your conversion.
http://www.GatewayPlumbing.com

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 3, 2009 4:39 PM

i_disagree: i believe the price was between $6-7k for the conversion (that included installation of boiler and hot water heater and removal of old equipment). If I'm way off on that estimate I'll re-post with correct numbers.

Posted by: bootsey78 at February 3, 2009 5:35 PM

To: Bootsey78 and I Disagree, thank you for your input and leads

To Master Plumber: My sincere thanks for this detailed reply. Believe it or not, I've reviewed two *years* worth of posts in the Heating section of this forum to educate myself and knew you would provide invaluable info.

It would seem logical that any property owner would want the highest efficiency boiler available, for the lowest fuel costs over the long term. But the chimney lining required by a such a unit would, I believe, add a few thousand dollars to the upfront cost of a oil to gas conversion. It seems this is the perennial tradeoff between upfront costs and long-term savings, correct?

So prompted by your replies, may I raise two follow up questions:

1) Is it possible to convert to a gas heating unit that would *not* require a new chimney lining?

2) And does a gas unit exist that is suitable for a closet installation which ALSO would work without a new chimney lining? Or is that just wishful thinking?

I want to emphasize that I'm a homeowner (and landlord) who is quite willing to pay the cost to have a project done right, and by the right company, rather than pinch pennies.

But I want to have a clear view of my options. Thanks for your additional input.

Posted by: Roebling at February 3, 2009 7:17 PM

You're welcome.

"High efficiency" at this point means 90%-96%, where it used to mean any boiler in the 84%-88% range, which we now call mid-efficiency.
To get the higher ratings, boiler venting has had to be redesigned entirely.
As a result, HE boilers tend to require vent and intake ducts direct to the outside. That makes nearly all of them suitable for closet installations.
Originally, their intended venting design was to pipe them right out a building's side (or rear or front) wall maintaining up to 5 feet of distance from doors and windows. As popularity increased, the HE boiler market expanded to include installations in the replacement market in major cities and so increased the need for boilers that could tolerate more venting designs.
Now we've got options to vent boilers to within one foot of a door or window, so you might not need to line your chimney at all if you can figure out a way to use a cellar or basement wall as a termination point for an HE boiler's exhaust.
If not, you'll have to use the chimney as a chase and drop a couple of pipes down it and connect them to your boiler.
And you're right, expect to pay several thousand dollars for the task.
Fortunately, doing that now sets you up for any future high efficiency equipment.

If you want to use your existing, unaltered chimney, you'll have to stick with standard efficiency.
The reason is that boiler and water heater exhaust gases that are under 350 degrees contain a corrosive dose of vaporized carbonic acid. Brick and terra cotta chimneys disintegrate when they come in contact with that stuff. The very idea of mid and high efficiency boilers is that they extract heat from the flue gases thereby decreasing the exhaust temperature to that critical point where they need something corrosion resistant to work safely as a flue conduit.

I hope that is all follow-able. (if that's a word)

http://www.GatewayPlumbing.com

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 3, 2009 8:36 PM

on the same subject: I planned to replace oil boiler this summer. I have 2x250gl oil tanks. Should I stop oil deliveries right now. So I will use up all the oil by the end of heating season and will save on it?
Or whoever removes the oil tank will pay back for the remains of the oil?

thanks

Posted by: bobjohn at February 3, 2009 8:51 PM

if you have the site conditions, and a hydronic heating system (hot water heat as opposed to steam)you can install numerous high efficiency boilers which will save you money on the back end (operating them over several years ) while more expensive on the front end (installation)...think weil mclain ultra, triangle tube, buderus ,lochnivar, burnham high efficiency, etc.. you should meet with a heating professional who will try to understand your budget and desires..but underline, this only works on a hydronic system...with steam, you have far fewer choices

Posted by: eman1234 at February 3, 2009 8:53 PM

Interesting. so let say if I will go with high efficiency, it will save 10% in fuel comparing to the mid-efficiency. If I pay 2000$/year in for oil right now it means, that I will save $4000 in 20 years. Does it cover the upfront cost. I underspend that oil prices will go up. But then we need to look at the TVM of the upfront costs.

on the same subject: I planned to replace oil boiler this summer. I have 2x250gl oil tanks. Should I stop oil deliveries right now. So I will use up all the oil by the end of heating season and will save on it?
Or whoever removes the oil tank will pay back for the remains of the oil?

thanks

Posted by: bobjohn at February 3, 2009 8:56 PM

TO: Master Plumber. This additional info is extremely useful (and, yes, `follow-able').

TO: Eman1234, I'm working with a steam system so hydronic options are out for me.

TO: Bobjohn: Not sure I could calculate exactly how much oil I will use before the end of the heating season to avoid a surplus in the tank before it's taken out. Not sure if a company engaged to remove the tank would pay for this surplus oil.

And also, I wonder if anyone else has had a tank removed by a company with the credentials cited above by Master Plumber: "Only companies certified, I believe by the DEP, to handle and transport fuel oil can legally drain and remove your tank. This company will also have the authority recognized by the FDNY to certify the tanks and their contents were removed safely in the event of a fire inspection."

Posted by: Roebling at February 3, 2009 9:58 PM

I use this company:
Evertight Tank Corp.
718-981-1818
They pump out the oil, cut out the fill pipe and cement over it as required by code, and cut out the tank without destroying your house.

Tell them Gateway Plumbing referred you. They don't advertise and respond well to word-of-mouth work.

What they'll also do is sell you small amounts of oil if you need it to get through a week or so while your conversion is in progress.

Nobody I know buys your old oil, though. Once it's in your tank, it's considered contaminated.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 4, 2009 7:39 AM

robling, if you intend to stay with steam, afaik there are no high-efficiency options so you'll have to exhaust thru the chimney and reline if necessary. (MP?)

Posted by: cmu at February 4, 2009 2:22 PM

Correct.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 4, 2009 4:07 PM

OP here.

CMU: Did I misunderstand your post? Since I will stay with steam, did you intend to write that there are *only* high-efficiency boiler options now on the market? (For example, I've looked at all of Burnham's Energy Star boilers which are all 85%-plus efficiency).

So for the long-term, to safely vent a high-efficiency boiler through my chimney (as opposed to the side wall or rear wall options described by Master Plumber above), I will likely need to reline the chimney.

MP: That's what you were responding "correct" to?

Posted by: Roebling at February 4, 2009 7:57 PM

No. What cmu is correctly saying is that there are no high or even mid-efficiency steam boilers on the market.

If your brick chimney is in good shape and can handle the boiler you install, then you're done.

If not, you'll have to reline it.

Your only other option with steam is a power vented boiler that also vents out a side wall but burns at the same efficiency.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 4, 2009 10:22 PM

Master Plumber, at the risk of wearing out my welcome in this thread, may I pursue this a bit further for all who turn to this forum with oil to steam conversion questions:

You had noted above: "If you want to use your existing, unaltered chimney, you'll have to stick with standard efficiency."

If I understand your subsequent 10:22 post, I also need to stick with standard efficiency for a steam system because "there are no high or even mid-efficiency steam boilers on the market."

And so my masonry chimney (terra cotta-lined) would not face the same corrosive vapors as it would from a high-efficiency boiler.

But I still need to confirm with a chimney company that my masonry chimney is in good shape, and whether or not I should proceed with the lining, before proceeding with the conversion

So, MP, do I have that straight now?

Thanks again

Posted by: Roebling at February 5, 2009 6:47 AM

No problem.

You've got it.

When you convert from oil to natural gas, as part of the DOB filing, you'll need to certify the chimney's fitness for use in the application.

The exhaust of an oil boiler is very different from that of a gas boiler (different moisture content, soot sticks to the walls with oil, gas dries it out and the stuff can fall in and block the flue) and so a smart thing to do is have your old chimney thoroughly cleaned and inspected near the time of the conversion.

A smart plvmber will let a good chimney contractor take care of all that and hold him to his evaluation.

Again, it's just the smart way to do it.


Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 5, 2009 7:58 AM

No problem.

You've got it.

When you convert from oil to natural gas, as part of the DOB filing, you'll need to certify the chimney's fitness for use in the application.

The exhaust of an oil boiler is very different from that of a gas boiler (different moisture content, soot sticks to the walls with oil, gas dries it out and the stuff can fall in and block the flue) and so a smart thing to do is have your old chimney thoroughly cleaned and inspected near the time of the conversion.

A smart plvmber will let a good chimney contractor take care of all that and hold him to his evaluation.

Again, it's just the smart way to do it.


Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 5, 2009 8:07 AM

Master Plumber, since a plumber would handle the DOB paperwork (per your earlier reply above) but the chimney contractor does the chimney inspection, who is responsible for certifying the chimney's fitness?

Should I expect any plumber to be prepared to coordinate this with a chimney contractor?

For those following this thread,, this earlier post on chimney contractors will be valuable, particularly your observations on the three types of chimney companies.

http://www.brownstoner.com/forum/archives/2008/09/a_tale_of_two_c.php#comments

When we purchased our home a few years ago, we had the interior of the chimney inspected (and filmed) by Robb Stasyshyn of Homestead Chimney, a company I chose because of their certification from the National Fire Protection Assn.

I would recommend them and would likely have them do an updated inspection.

Here's their link:

http://www.homesteadchimney.com/about.html

Would other chimney contractors often cited on this forum, Big Apple Chimney or A&A, care to weigh in here on whether they have NFPA certification or not?

Posted by: Roebling at February 5, 2009 11:07 AM

The plumber certifies the chimney. It's a section on the plumber's permit application, but as a plumber who is well-trained and certified in the area of combustion analysis and carbon monoxide detection, I can tell you that inspecting chimneys and identifying/repairing problems is not what plumbers are good at even though they think they are.
It's a skill set best left to those who do it every day.

For that reason, I always follow the recommendations of trusted chimney contractors I work with and I'll certify a chimney unless they tell me it's in my interest not to.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 5, 2009 12:15 PM

MP: Again, a very valuable answer to someone trying to figure out all the jigsaw pieces of this oil-to-gas conversion.

Regarding an earlier certification you cited above, would the plumber or the asbestos abatement company file the ACP-5 form certifying there is no asbestos in the work area?

Would a plumber provide guidance on how much asbestos needs to be removed for a safe work area around the new boiler?

For example: a pipe connecting the existing boiler to a radiator might be wrapped in asbestos for its entire length. Does the full length of the wrap need to be removed or only an amount near the connection to the boiler, as directed by the plumber?

Posted by: Roebling at February 5, 2009 1:29 PM

I got 8 estimates recently. Was looking for a package deal - company taking of everything including tank removal, etc .... Cheapest quote was $6200. Most expensive was $18K (from Master P by the way). Most of the estimates came between $6200-$8500.

Posted by: brownie77 at February 5, 2009 3:22 PM

I got 8 estimates recently. Was looking for a package deal - company taking care of everything including tank removal, etc .... so I would only deal with one guy (even if they have to subcontract some of the work, just wanted 1 interlocutor). Cheapest quote was $6200. Most expensive was $18K (from Master P by the way). Most of the estimates came between $6200-$8500.
Hope it helps.
Cheers.

Posted by: brownie77 at February 5, 2009 3:23 PM

FYI, we converted from oil to gas in November, one pipe steam system, for $7500, $2000 or so of which was for an indirect (ultra stor) hot water system. It included removal and disposal of the two oil tanks in the basement. The boiler is a Burnham Independence, reg efficiency (82-84%).

Posted by: riis10 at February 5, 2009 5:38 PM

Christophe, you claimed in another post to have "10 plumbers" quote you on your boiler replacement job.
I suspect you haven't had it done yet because I see no permit in the system for your address. Either that or your plumber just didn't follow through with his responsibility to file.
Your building required a 12-section boiler. That's much bigger than most boilers we see in a residential building. The price I quoted you was more like $11,000, which is what the job was worth if you wanted it done well, with options for commercial and high-efficiency water heaters that certainly do cost more than standard equipment.
If I remember correctly, you were looking to gain efficiency with your new equipment. These were simply options. You were in no way obligated.
Now that you've posted this misleading claim three times, in two different threads, can we leave it that you got other prices more in line with your budget and stop what looks like a personal vendetta against my company?

I don't have a dime of your money and never will.

Move on.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 5, 2009 7:54 PM

To add a point to Master Plumber's excellent explanation above, I'd like to add a bit more regarding the architectural requirements for the enclosure room.

First of all, there is a breakdown between single family homes and multi-tenant dwellings. In the case of a single family home, a rated enclosure is not required (or wasn't prior to 2008 I don't know if the new code changed this).

So assuming you've got a multi-family building mechanical room, there is the question of when the building is built. If the building construction or entire boiler room is new, it must follow all aspects of the newly adopted code. If the boiler room existed prior to 1968, only aspects of it that are being modified would be required to be upgraded to current code. It's important to consider that codes are safety MINIMUMS, so that it's probably a better idea to upgrade to current safety standards anyway if possible.

Most inspectors would be looking for three at least different things on a mechanical room enclosure:

1. The door assembly would be fire proof and self-closing, with a UL fire rating of 1.5 hours (called a type "B" door and frame). I'm using the word assembly rather than just door since it means door, frame, and how the whole thing's attached to the wall. You can't place a rated door into a non-rated frame for compliance.

2. The assembly of the walls and ceiling would be 2 hour fire rated if the room is built post 1968. The integrity of the rated assembly would need to be certified by an engineer or architect. There are occasional posts on this forum saying things like fire rating equals a certain amount of sheetrock, like one layer of board, etc., which is not correct. Fire rating is determined by every component of the partition's assembly, materials of both sides of the wall or ceiling, taping methods, and stopping around any penetrations from things like pipes or conduits.

3. The fresh air intake would be appropriately sized and have a fire damper.

If the boiler room is old code (pre 1968), it is built prior to modern fire ratings, so the material standards of the enclosure are proscribed by a chapter in the 1916 code. This code is in some respects a bit more flexible and includes things like sheet metal enclosures. It is still up to an inspector's discretion to require that the room be brought to contemporary standards.

If an inspector is being a real stickler for some reason, then clearances and dimensions around the equipment come into play. The next circle of Hell would be compliance with MEA numbers for all installed components. This rarely comes up though.

I know that this is all a bit confusing but want to stress that there is no single answer for enclosure requirements. It is a mixture of overlapping codes, based on when the room was built, and requirements that are complex enough that the people who enforce them don't always fully know them.

Posted by: Smokychimp at February 6, 2009 12:36 PM

Smokychimp

Thanks for contributing to a thread that I hope will be helpful for many forum users looking at a conversion. This is very valuable information

In my case, this conversion is for a single-family house. So I realize the enclosure code may not be as strict.

However, I am dealing with the following spatial puzzle and I would welcome architectural input.

The footprint of this property includes a primary section that 17 feet wide by 38 feet deep. A secondary kitchen extension is 9 feet wide by 19 feet deep.

The chimney stack is on the left side of a passageway from the main section of the basement to the extension, so that dictates where the boiler must go. (It is currently in the larger section of the basement, immediately next to the stack).

A half-bath is on the right side of the passageway and an existing waste line and shower drain (no sink) dictate the location of that bath.

Unfortunately, the juxtaposition of the chimney stack and the bath lines creates a bit of a bottleneck in that section of the basement.

So while I would like to create a visual enclosure for the boiler for aesthetic reasons, I don't much clearance to do so.

That's why I raised the idea above of using some sort of ceiling to floor metal panels (similar to those found on radiator covers) These would be removable to service the boiler. And allow sufficient air flow, of course.

Have you ever seen such an enclosure? Or have an opinion on whether it would work?
Or another solution to the same issues of small clearance enclosure?

Posted by: Roebling at February 6, 2009 5:05 PM

Outstanding post, Smokychimp.
I've never had a clearer explanation of these points.

Posted by: Master Plvmber at February 6, 2009 5:17 PM

May I take this discussion of oil-to-gas conversion back a step?
I own a one-family attached brick house, circa 1910.
The oil furnace was relatively new when we bought the house in '97. I was advised at that time (by a plumber) not to spend the extra $ to convert. Oil was cheaper than gas, etc....
We haven't had heating problems. But the price of oil has gone up and recently we had a smoking/sooty problem that has me thinking again of possibly converting to gas. I consulted a plumber -- same guy as before -- and he still advises against it. Reasons: Something about better BTU with oil (vs gas); pressure from the street into homes is poor because so many homes have gas, so the furnace is "on" all the time, but the warmth isn't there...
I don't know what this plumber's angle is ... maybe doesn't want to be the last kid on the block using oil?!... but I'M thinking - Hey, should I just sit tight longer and see if, in a few years, maybe ..solar panels?! or something...won't be the way to go? I mean, if I'm spending so much $ to convert, let's convert to something that really will pay off.
So, my question is: What are the arguments FOR/AGAINST conversion? Obviously, up-front costs of conversion are in the AGAINST column. Back-end savings are in the FOR column. What else? Did this plumber have any good points, about the quality of the heat/ gas pressure / etc?
I really appreciate the help MP and others provide here.... May you all be blessed with trouble-free, affordable, sustainable warmth!

Posted by: crownheightshood at February 12, 2009 10:27 PM

Crownheightshood, OP here. You've raised an interesting question. Are there good reasons (financial or otherwise) to *stay* with oil nowadays? Since this thread is now three-plus weeks and 25 comments old, I wonder if you might get more replies by raising this topic in a new thread. This thread is three-plus weeks and two-dozen plus posts old

Posted by: Roebling at February 20, 2009 6:38 PM

I am also looking to do an oil to gas conversion in a 2 Family brownstone house in Bensonhurst. I called a couple of local plumbers and got quotes around the $10K range (removal of oil tank, installation new gas and water broiler). We are also thinking about putting separate meters for each floor so renters can pay for their own gas. The quote for that procedure is $5K, is that normal?

Posted by: namahs at March 7, 2009 1:05 AM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.