Newsletter |

Case-Shiller: More Stable But Not Good

case-shiller-0110.jpg
S&P/Case-Shiller released its November report on housing prices across the nation's 20 biggest cities and the news wasn't particularly good. There were some signs of stabilizing (and four cities have even seen price rises over the last year), but, as David M. Blitzer, chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s, put it, "there is no clear sign of a sustained, broad-based recovery." New York appeared to have continued downward momentum, with prices off 1% from October and more than 7% from a year earlier; the 20-city index as a whole was down 5.3% over the year. U.S. News & World Report estimates that overall prices have another 5 to 10% left to fall. "We see a big backlog of distressed properties that could come on the market in the next several quarters," Celia Chen of Moody's Economy.com told the publication. The Case-Shiller report comes on the heels of a larger-than-expected drop in existing home sales.
A Look at Case-Shiller, by Metro Area [WSJ]
Home Prices Stabilize Further [U.S. News]
Tough Times for Housing Market Followers [Seeking Alpha]



63 Comments

By Brownstones Half Off on January 27, 2010 9:36 AM

"Case-Shiller: More Stable But Not Good"

BHO: Oxymoron.

***Bid half off peak comps***

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 9:44 AM

The data as presented above is useless. It all depends upun the rate of acceleration, whether that is rising or falling.

BHO, get out a calculus book and look up first & second derivatives.

Report back when you learn something.

**500,000**

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 9:52 AM

DIBS wrong again. Evidence is evidence.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 9:56 AM

DCB, learn something before you post. The numbers posted above are useless without context.

This is high school math.

By joeingowanus on January 27, 2010 9:57 AM

i believe the children are our future....

sing along everybody!!

By dittoburg on January 27, 2010 9:59 AM

Are they saying the decline is stable?

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:01 AM

I'm also glad that New Home Sales continue to disappoint. We don't need new homes anywhere.

By Minard Lafever on January 27, 2010 10:04 AM

dave,
explain what you mean about context. I am not in the business so I find it fascinating. My sense of the market is based on friends and acquaintences and how things are selling in my building oand on my block. A little background on these technical numbers would be, as they say, edifying.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 10:06 AM

Both the delta (absolute) and the gamma (rate of change of delta) are in decline.

This is the Case-Shiller index for New York single family houses over the longer term:
http://imgur.com/ntYmQ

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 10:07 AM

sorry - delta = "absolute change", not "absolute"

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:14 AM

chicken, the raw data for that chart is as follows:

April 170.67
May 171.16
June 172.36
July 174.16
Aug 175.48
Sept 175.32
Oct 174.97
Nov 173.24

Your conclusion about the rate of change still in decline was wrong beginning in May. yes, Oct 7 Nov have broken that trend but to anyone looking at the chart, the overall steep decline from the peak has certainly abated.

Thanks for that link though. I've been looking for a way to get BBRG charts up on here!!!

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:15 AM

Minard...just within the context of the previous data...the chart that chicken put up

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 10:15 AM

Minard,
what DIBS is talking about is whether things are incrementally improving or worsening.
eg If last month, house prices were down 20% year-on-year and this month they are "only" down 10% then that is an improvement in sentiment, if not the actual price.

I appreciate relative movements but I also like to look at absolutes. As my old boss used to tell me, "you can't eat a relative sandwich"

By Colonel Steve Austin on January 27, 2010 10:18 AM

Dave is pointing out that we are falling at a slower rate than before. Forget all that talk about 1st and 2nd derivatives, he's just trying to show off. All he's really trying to say is, things are better now because they aren't as bad as they used to be.Of course this is a faulty conclusion, but nonetheless, that what he's arguing.

Any middle school kid who's taken pre-algebra knows that when you multiply with a negative number, the product will always be negative. Last i checked negative numbers were still a bad thing when it comes to the value of one's home.

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 10:27 AM

CSA is right on all counts. DIBS knows absolutely nothing about Calculus (First or 2nd Derivatives) or physics (acceleration).
The calculation DIBS is looking for is rate of change, which does not involve calculus. Very simple math.
ROC may be slowing, but that certainly does not mean the housing market has stopped declining. It hasn't. That is what the numbers show. Nobody who actually knows anything about financial markets would confuse a slowing ROC for a major turnaround.

By Park_loper on January 27, 2010 10:33 AM

The person who said the only important point is rate of acceleration has apparently lost the ability to objectively handle data. That's the most absurd thing I've read in some time.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 10:35 AM

Here's some interesting reading from someone who knows A LOT about real estate.

http://www.ritholtz.com/blog/2010/01/an-insiders-view-of-the-real-estate-train-wreck/

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:39 AM

Look at the chart, DCB, the rate of change has levelled off and the absolute prces have essentially levelled off in the 173-175 range. Is it that hard to see???????

If the NYC CS number was 174 in July and was 174 in Oct and 173 + in Nov then there's been no further decline.

How hard is this to understand?? Whether or not it's calculus or algebra, you still miss the point. A derivative is still a derivative.

By Brownstones Half Off on January 27, 2010 10:45 AM

"BHO, get out a calculus book and look up first & second derivatives."

From here...

f'(comps) < 0. f''(comps) < 0. We have turned the corner. We're going concave down again. We are double dipping. The first dip was inline with the March lows in stocks. The second dip will be inline with the phase out of reGOVery intervention and further bank failures as more and more borrowers try on Rockports.

Qualitatively, how can the market be "stable" but "not good" at the same time? The latter phrase usually denotes bad news ahead.

***Bid half off peak comps***

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 10:46 AM

Read a book, DIBS!
It was more amusing and thought provoking when "The What" was the biggest lunatic on this site.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:51 AM

Look at the raw numbers that I posted, DCB. Are you really that blind???? They've stopped declining for the most part.

The high was 215 in June 2006. It dropped to 170.67 in April 2009 and has risen to the 173-175 level.

Which part of this is too difficult for you to understand????

Coincidentally, that's the same time the US stock market began to rally. Go figure!!!!!

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 10:54 AM

And the overall numbers for the 20 largest metropolitan cities look the same...

Peak...July 2006...206.52

LowApril 2009...139.25

And now four straight months above 146.

These are the facts

By Colonel Steve Austin on January 27, 2010 10:59 AM

Dave,

1 Mos 3 Mos 1Yr
Nov 08 186.52 -1.7% -3.6% -8.7%
Dec 08 183.46 -1.6% -4.3% -9.2%
Jan 09 180.94 -1.4% -4.6% -9.7%
Feb 09 177.83 -1.7% -4.7% -10.3%
Mar 09 173.60 -2.4% -5.4% -11.7%
Apr 09 170.67 -1.7% -5.7% -12.4%
May 09 171.16 0.3% -3.8% -11.9%
Jun 09 172.36 0.7% -0.7% -11.5%
Jul 09 174.16 1.0% 2.0% -10.1%
Aug 09 175.48 0.8% 2.5% -9.3%
Sep 09 175.32 -0.1% 1.7% -8.5%
Oct 09 174.97 -0.2% 0.5% -7.8%
Nov 09 173.24 -1.0% -1.3% -7.1%


Look's like we're headed down just like the stock market. Go figure.

By Minard Lafever on January 27, 2010 11:00 AM

Washington DC is of course lookin' good. Government thrives whether or not the private sector is in a nose dive.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:05 AM

Look at the chart, Steve. It doesn't get much clearer that things are not getting any worse....

http://imgur.com/ntYmQ

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 11:06 AM

The steep decline (the decline you ranted would never occur) has abated somewhat. That does not mean the housing decline is over. You are inferring things about the future that may or may not occur. Hope is not the same as fact. You have been so hopeful, and so wrong, for so long that you are becoming very dull.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:14 AM

"You are inferring things about the future that may or may not occur. Hope is not the same as fact."

Apparently so are you!!!

I don't really care at all about the short term housing prices. I have also pointed out since early 2009 that the stock market and the Leading Indicators were beginning to rally and that this would be a rally not to be missed. I have more than made up in the stock market for any decline in price that my houses have suffered.

So, I may be dull but I'm happy dull.

I am not hopeful of prices rising soon. I never said that. I have predicted, going on some 5-6 months that prices for brooklyn brownstones would bottom around year-end 2009 and it looks like they are.

I welcome hearing any predictions that you might like to make, DCB or are you unable to formulate any??? Who is really the dull one here, me with my predictions or you just sitting there telling me I'm wrong??? Laughable, really!!!!

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:15 AM

And no where did I ever say prices would not decline. You have me confused with someone else.

By Colonel Steve Austin on January 27, 2010 11:21 AM

Dave, you buying $$s yet? Equities are done.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:26 AM

Steve...we shorted the yen and then covered it. i want to short the Yen (YCS) again soon as it becomes clear that the dollar may strengthen. Obama has not been good for that lately. if the rhetoric is toned down in the speach tonigh, the dollar will strengthen but THAT'S NOT A BET I'm willing to make ahead of Obama's speech.

If Yen breaks 88 it goes to 86 and maybe then you short it.

It's too tough to call right now because politics are involved.

The Euro is all a call on Greece & Spain. The move from 1.50 to 1.40 in such a short period of time is also unprecedented. But since it now hinges on greece & Spain, it's a very risky bet and one that we've stepped away from

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:27 AM

Still buying japan here. The orderliness and "western style" bankruptcy of JAL was a really good thing. Japan is very, very cheap.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 11:31 AM

"The Euro is all a call on Greece & Spain. The move from 1.50 to 1.40 in such a short period of time is also unprecedented. But since it now hinges on greece & Spain, it's a very risky bet and one that we've stepped away from
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at January 27, 2010 11:26 AM"

My bet is euro goes below 1.2 - not so much dollar strength as euro weakness. We'll see if I'm right by the end of the year.

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 11:35 AM

You never admit when you are wrong, DIBS. I have not made any predictions about the future, because I am waiting to see the market stabilize, even though I COULD buy a home all cash, and not really care if home prices went down another 10% or 15%. (I am not talking about Bed Stuy either). I think housing is still high in Brooklyn. I don't feel like dropping 2M in a well without a bottom. I do think we are nearing an inflection point and I am taking a wait and see attitude with my own money.
Prediction: the current correction in the stock market is not major. I am long financials, Energy, Pharmaceuticals and Biotech. Also have positions in high yield, but that is nervous money. I also took a flier on the Japanese and Mexican stock markets. If I am wrong, I will lose my own money.
I personally hope the housing sell off is going to bottom soon, because that would be good for the country and I am sick of renting. When it happens for real and not in your hope driven imagination I'll be the first to cheer.
By the way, plotted the data. That is NOT a pretty chart.

By Colonel Steve Austin on January 27, 2010 11:37 AM

I just covered the the 1.50 to 1.4 move (actually 1.49 to 1.415, yesterday). To me is less about the EUR and more about the USD. As soon as Fed hints at raising rates, USD is headed much higher.

How will this 'stabilizing' RE market hold up once rising interest rate become a reality?

By party is over on January 27, 2010 11:40 AM

The New York number (173.24) is not based on statistics from Manhattan and Brooklyn. The Case Shiller Index is helpful if you want to understand the trend in Westchester or Nassau county. My guess is that Brooklyn price has more room to drop than what Case Shiller suggests.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:41 AM

Here's the chart, DCB.

http://imgur.com/ntYmQ

Move on.

By Brownstones Half Off on January 27, 2010 11:42 AM

"I have predicted, going on some 5-6 months that prices for brooklyn brownstones would bottom around year-end 2009 and it looks like they are."

WRONG! You originally said they would bottom BY year-end, not AROUND (if I had time to sift through your server-crashing stockpile of comments). It's time for a 3rd revision in your prediction.

***Bid half off peak comps***

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:46 AM

They've bottomed, BHO. Just because this doesn't fit your "world view" doesn't mean it hasn't happened.

Get off the fence.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 11:48 AM

Fixed the chart for you DIBS. No need to thank me.

http://imgur.com/edIoN

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 11:54 AM

Thanks for the long term chart DIBS. I don't really think anyone can read to the right of the chart, but if I had to I would say that is one of the scariest charts I have ever seen.

It shows a parabolic rise, followed by an equally sharp 30 percent decline. Then a tiny blip up followed by an equally tiny blip down that almost takes the market to its most recent low. If the low holds, then perhaps we are putting in a bottom. That is why I said earlier that we are at an inflection point. Sure doesn't look good on the chart, and I have been looking at charts since I had to plot the data by hand.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 11:54 AM

LOL, chicken...that's giving BHO & DCB a woody. I can see them printing that and jacking off to it!!!!!

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 11:59 AM

Nice one chicken. I don't think that is what's going to happen, and as Ive said before, no one can read to the right, but that sure is what a return to long term trend looks like.

That chart is even uglier than DIBS's comments about his romantic life.

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 12:01 PM

DIBS is fantasizing about me jerking off again. Blech!

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 12:03 PM

Glad you all enjoyed - now play nice!

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 12:04 PM

That chart is even uglier than DIBS's comments about his romantic life.

Posted by: DeadCatBounce at January 27, 2010 11:59 AM

Bitter, DCB???? Keep your remarks about your lack of a sex life to the OT, not in the these other threads. Your lack of class is beginning to show.


Let me give you a word of advice about your investing activity and your interest in buying a house. If you have your money in the stock market and you're also planning on using that same money to buy a house you are making one of the biggest mistakes of all time.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 12:05 PM

DIBS is fantasizing about me jerking off again. Blech!

Posted by: DeadCatBounce at January 27, 2010 12:01 PM


Hardly. No pun intended.

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 12:10 PM

Thanks for the free advice DIBS. Let me return the favor: "Whom the gods would destroy, first they make arrogant".

By joeingowanus on January 27, 2010 12:15 PM

everybody is so mean around here.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 12:25 PM

Just trying to help you out, DCB.

"Let he who has not sinned cast the first stone."

You seem to be the arrogant one.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 12:26 PM

"everybody is so mean around here.

Posted by: joeingowanus at January 27, 2010 12:15 PM"


Not everybody Joe...

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 12:32 PM

I started out by pointing out by saying the data was useless without the history and that when you look at the recent history, the slope of the graph indicates to the naked eye that the numbers have bottomed.

DCB comes in with some sort of holier than though prognostications as to whether this is algebra or calculus and proceeds to launch a personal attack.

Sad, really.

By DeadCatBounce on January 27, 2010 12:42 PM

The slope of that graph indicates no such thing. That chart looks like Death.
Pointing out that Rate of Change is a simple arithmetic calculation is not a personal comment.
Saying that I am jerking off to a chart, now that is a personal comment. And sexual harrasment.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 12:52 PM

Saying that I am jerking off to a chart, now that is a personal comment. And sexual harrasment.

Posted by: DeadCatBounce at January 27, 2010 12:42 PM


We don't have an HR department here on the blog.

By Brownstones Half Off on January 27, 2010 1:38 PM

"They've bottomed, BHO. Just because this doesn't fit your 'world view' doesn't mean it hasn't happened."

No they have not. They cannot and will not bottom until volume peaks for the second of two times per cycle, once before the top (euphoria) and once more before the bottom (fear and capitulation - in slow motion for RE). Has volume peaked? Absolutely not.

Your second sentence is true, however.

***Bid half off peak comps***

By DeLepp on January 27, 2010 1:41 PM

Interesting calculator, determines whether financial sense to walk away and rent:

http://tinyurl.com/cjvtob

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 1:54 PM

I didn't see the box to input "Moral Obligation" or the output number as to "Damage to Credit Rating"

By DeLepp on January 27, 2010 1:57 PM

dibs, right, or agita of being chased by creditors.

By lincolnlimestone on January 27, 2010 2:07 PM

Chicken, your long term trend is basically tracking only 1992-1997. There's no reason to think that that 5 year trend is a more relevant time than the other years. Does this data go back any further?

By Whuh on January 27, 2010 4:20 PM

I'm starting to believe DIBS is bi-polar, and shouldn't be engaged with anymore. The cherrypicking, the hysterical namecalling, the frenzied excitement over the tiniest shred of confirmation for his own simplistic theories. Truly amazing. Any time someone with this personality profile tells me something is "forming a bottom," I'm tempted to sell with both hands. Just sayin'.

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 4:26 PM

Thanks for the input, Whuh. Got any comments on the subject thread or are you just here as an armchair psychologist???


Secondly, do you really think I actually give a shit???

By daveinbedstuy on January 27, 2010 4:53 PM

Hamptons home sales jumped 59% in Q4 from a year earlier and the median price rose 4.9% according to Miller Samuel.

This of course cannot be construed as factual in an any way, shape or form.

By the chicken on January 27, 2010 5:32 PM

"Chicken, your long term trend is basically tracking only 1992-1997. There's no reason to think that that 5 year trend is a more relevant time than the other years. Does this data go back any further?

Posted by: lincolnlimestone at January 27, 2010 2:07 PM"


No - that's as far back as Case-Shiller goes. I have seen graphs that go back further but not ones that apply specifically to New York.

From what I have seen, property transactions seem to be electronically recorded so if the archives have been converted then there might be some way to scrape the data and get a longer-term chart.

As for my "extrapolation", it was very much tongue in cheek - of course you could get any result you wanted depending on the two points you picked.

If I were to take it a bit more seriously, I would calculate another line based upon the multiples of median income (Case Shiller is nominal) to get a long-run average.

By hannible on January 29, 2010 5:41 AM

In New York, onerous real estate laws mean that foreclosures take roughly six months to complete, and post-foreclosure sales don't usually close for another four months after that. This has kept buyers away, and hamstrung real estate recovery in the area.

"In states with complex foreclosure laws, the recovery is clearly being delayed," says Simonsen. "For example, there are investment funds that will buy in Texas and California, but won't buy in New York because it takes so long to foreclose--and then you have to go to court."

New York prices likely have much farther to fall.

Although the rate of decline has mellowed from stomach-turning to gentle nationwide, these numbers show that any jubilation over a recovered real estate market would be premature.
http://realestate.yahoo.com/promo/cities-with-the-fastest-falling-home-prices.html
DIBS get champagne we gotta celebrate!

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Related Posts with Thumbnails