Sign up for the Brownstoner daily email
« Ratner Tight-Lipped on AY Details Condo of the Day: 689 Myrtle Avenue, #1G »

November 9, 2009

21123 Revealed - And Exposed

211%2023rd%20street%2011-09.jpg
Last week Curbed revealed that the posters and sidewalk spray-paintings that have popped up all over the Slope recently were for the condo at 211 23rd Street; The Courier and The Eagle both gave the publicity stunt ink last week as well, so it's fair to say that the guerilla campaign (which also included an annoying spam post on the Forum) succeeded in getting attention. Not all of it was positive, however: The Courier noted some posts on Brooklynian by irritated neighbors. “Defacing a neighborhood isn’t the most enlightened way to sell a new development in the area," said one. And there are plenty of other area residents who are failing to find the humor in the project. The building was originally one of the Scarano mezzanine specials that was caught with its pants down; while the developers scrambled to save the project (which they ultimately did by merging tax lots to create enough FAR to make the mezzanines legit), the site turned into a quality-of-life nightmare ("trash, broken windows, a disgusting port-o-potty that was left to rot for 2 years," according to one reader who lives nearby) for Greenwood Heights. When we last wrote about the development way back in January '07, sales were already under way for the first time, with prices ranging from the mid-$400,000's to $889,000. Listings after the relaunch now run from $563,748 to $811,578.
Park Slope Mystery Ads Were for Ugly Condo Building [Curbed]
211 23rd Street: Livin' La Vida Scarano [Brownstoner] GMAP
211 23rd Street [Official Site]

23rd-street-lot-combo.jpg




Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12201

Comments

My daughter's apartment looks directly at this development. An utterly useless fact, but thought you might want to know.

Posted by: benson at November 9, 2009 11:35 AM

I was quite annoyed that they felt the need to spray paint the sidewalks for their ads. I thought that was a no-no?

Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at November 9, 2009 11:38 AM

Someone put this up in the forum weeks back, and the comments solved it then.

They did not only spray the sidewalks, they also spraypainted walls in the neighborhood. They should pay some tickets, no?

Posted by: Park Place at November 9, 2009 11:42 AM

they said they were gonna come back and clean it up tho!

*rob*

Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 11:43 AM

Instead of spending time and money spray painting our hood with stupid cryptic ads, they should have put that money and effort towards expanding the closets in those POS apts so it would fit more than six shirts and a single Timberland boot. Jackasses.

Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at November 9, 2009 11:46 AM

Wow, how reasonable. $560k to $811k! How can they get away with such low low prices in such a prime area?

Posted by: tybur6 at November 9, 2009 11:52 AM

> a single Timberland boot

Fun fact: "Zapatao" (big shoe) is Brazilian slang for a lesbian.

Posted by: DitmasSnark at November 9, 2009 11:56 AM

:-) Well, this Zapatao wants a bigger closet for her zapatos!

Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at November 9, 2009 12:00 PM

Ah, finally 211 rears it's ugly head again...remember the "beam me up Scotty" comments on this blog from 2007?

Now it's "beam me up Potty" as this POS literally stinks up the neighborhood, not only from it's lack of context to the neighborhood (which is mixed at best) but it's terribly shoddy construction (again, saying a lot for some of the older homes in GWH, though they are 100+ year old frames, so perhaps I should retract...) that has not stood the test of time since this project originally tanked.

I walked by it the other day and am still amazed at it's absolute lack of architectural integrity...but wait, it's a Scarano.

A rose by any other name...

Posted by: Action Jackson at November 9, 2009 12:10 PM

i used to take guitar lessons directly across from this place, and i just remember sitting there thinking, "man, is that building awful." you might possibly be able to make a building look uglier and more out of place, but it would take a special kind of genius. seriously, does scarano (or whoever designs for him) hate eyes?

Posted by: NsPx at November 9, 2009 1:02 PM

out of context buildings like these look like an erection in spandex!

*rob*

Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 1:16 PM

"out of context buildings like these look like an erection in spandex!


From the Robot Lords of Mars!

Posted by: Action Jackson at November 9, 2009 1:32 PM

Even better:

http://bk.ly/Xx

Seems old Bobby is suing the new architect of record, Micheal Muroff, Leewood Real Estate Group LLC and Greenwood Heights Associates, LLC.

I'll read on, but for what? Improving his design?

Posted by: Action Jackson at November 9, 2009 1:50 PM

Ah, this is laughable:

Nature of Suit: Intellectual Property - Copyrights
Cause: Federal Question
Jurisdiction: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 17:101 Copyright Infringement

Posted by: Action Jackson at November 9, 2009 1:52 PM

> out of context buildings like these look like an erection in spandex!

Not so much an erection as an erector set.

Posted by: DitmasSnark at November 9, 2009 2:22 PM

Post a comment

Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.

Latest Restaurant Additions