« Condo of the Day: 689 Myrtle Avenue, #1G Streetlevel: Brooklyn Kitchen/Meat Hook Opening Imminent »
November 9, 2009
House of the Day: 430 10th Street Revisited

This house at 430 10th Street has been on the market for-effing-ever. After selling for $1,200,000 in 2005, the new owners started out trying to get $1,865,000 last year. By August of this year, the ask was down to $1,650,000 and in September it was reduced further to $1,595,000. Since the broker doesn't even have his own website and only tiny photos are available on StreetEasy, it would be interesting to hear from someone who's actually seen the interiors.
430 10th Street [Timothy Norton] GMAP P*Shark
House of the Day: 430 10th Street [Brownstoner]
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12194
Comments
I visited this house back when it was asking a lot more, and again very recently. I remember thinking last year that the owner was nuts for asking so much, and I think he really shot himself in the foot as now the house seems destined for death by many cuts - current price by the way has been cut another $30K. When I saw it recently, it looked worse as the furniture had been moved out but it looks worse for the wear (scuffed up, etc. ) and weirdly even smaller-looking. I think he made a mistake by using ground floor as a rental - it makes the owners unit feel very small and inconvenient (at well over $1mil!) to have to go up the stairs. I think he'd be lucky to make back the money he bought this house for.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 1:22 PM
Lower the ask to $1.1 or $1.2 and I'll go take a look.
Posted by: CarrollGardened at November 9, 2009 1:25 PM
"the broker doesn't even have his own website and only tiny photos are available on StreetEasy"
NEXT ---------------->
Posted by: InsertSnappyNameHere at November 9, 2009 1:26 PM
Back when it was HOTD and listed at $1.865mil, someone made this comment:
--------------------------------
looks adorable.
given those other selling prices for ps, i would not be surprised at all if they get close to this...
Posted by: guest at June 30, 2008 1:49 PM
------------------------------------
ROTFL!! 11217, was that you again?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 1:27 PM
I would imagine that they will be lucky to get 1.3 at this point for this house.
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 1:30 PM
No stevie.
I don't write in all lower case.
Can you give it a rest, please. I don't pick fights with you, yet you seem to want to do it every day, and on every thread with me.
(Even though last week you said you only post on brownstoner once a week).
I guess since you were also commenting half the time as bitter bubble, you were only half lying.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:30 PM
11217, is that an offer of truce?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 1:32 PM
It looks like a dumpy house. No curb appeal at all. The front door looks like a $99.99 fiberglass special.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 1:33 PM
Not such a pretty block.
Not such a pretty exterior.
Not such a pretty interior.
Not such a great location.
Sadly, another case of Schadenfreude.
Posted by: Pigeon at November 9, 2009 1:34 PM
yeah that is definitely a fugly house, that block looks like it could pass for the slums of baltimore.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 1:35 PM
hey, Miss Muffett, good call on 29 4th place, which was a HOTD back in 2008. You said it was overpriced at $1.695 even though everyone thought it should have no problem selling at that price. It sold at $1.22mil last month. GREAT CALL!
http://www.brownstoner.com/brownstoner/archives/2008/09/house_of_the_da_565.php
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 1:35 PM
Yes, stevie. We really don't have much to argue about, actually. I, like you find many properties overpriced also, and welcome lower prices generally so that more people can take advantage of them and create a more diverse environment.
Let's move on please, and try to be civil.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:36 PM
first off 11217 you are a fool.
second it is my guess that prices are now around what they were selling for in second half of 2005? Does that sound about right to ya'll?
Posted by: bitter_bubble_buyer at November 9, 2009 1:37 PM
Just curious, Rob...you ever been to Baltimore, because that block of Park Slope looks nothing like the slums of good ole Charm City.
You wouldn't last 5 minutes in the slums of Baltimore. Trust me.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:38 PM
11217, sounds very reasonable. lets move on then. thanks!
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 1:38 PM
11217 likes the slope, and he's optimistic.
There's no harm in that!
(But I think even he would be bearish on this 10th street house, no?)
Posted by: Pigeon at November 9, 2009 1:39 PM
Yes, Pigeon. Thanks.
And agree...this house is not doing it for me, and probably needs to come down on price yet again.
But I do love the Slope (and Brooklyn for that matter) and prefer to think the best instead of the worst. About many things...not just real estate.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:41 PM
BBB,
Why do you say 11217 is a fool?
Because he didn't accurately predict the future?
Posted by: Pigeon at November 9, 2009 1:42 PM
Actually, all along I've said house prices in Brownstone Brooklyn would come down, but not on the level that some of the fringe crazies said it would (i.e. 50-60%).
It seems Brooklyn prices have dropped about 20-30% which is exactly the percentage I've been saying for over a year.
I'm not even sure they've dropped that much yet, but I assume they still have a little further to fall.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:46 PM
*F* off 11217, you have no clue where i would or would not last, and i did not even state that i could so youre pulling stuff from your butt again. and ive seen many many pictures slummish neighborhoods in baltimore.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 1:46 PM
I'm from Baltimore.
And I live in Park Slope.
Equating the slums of Baltimore with 10th Street in Park Slope makes you look even more ignorant than usual.
But since you've "seen pictures" I guess you know better.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:47 PM
Since we're all hating on 11217, I guess I will too.
:-P
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 1:51 PM
I'm done here for the day.
I can't say anything without a bunch of idiots jumping on my back about it.
Posted by: 11217 at November 9, 2009 1:53 PM
I suspect Baltimore ia probably 1/5th the price of a comparable Broolyn house
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 1:55 PM
DIBS!!!
Speaking on hating on someone, your buddy blankfein at Goldman says bankers do "God's work". ROTFL!!
******************
http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/11/09/2009-11-09_goldman_ceo_says_hes_doing_gods_work.html
The chief executive of Goldman Sachs, which has attracted widespread media attention over the size of its staff bonuses, believes banks serve a social purpose and are doing "God's work."
In an interview with London's Sunday Times newspaper, Lloyd Blankfein also said he believed big profits and bonuses at banks were a sign that the world economy was recovering.
"We help companies to grow by helping them to raise capital. Companies that grow create wealth. This, in turn, allows people to have jobs that create more growth and more wealth. We have a social purpose," he told the paper.
The dominant Wall Street bank posted third-quarter earnings of $3 billion and plans to hand out more than $20 billion in year-end bonuses.
Blankfein told the Sunday Times that the bank's compensation practices correlated with long-term performance.
"Others made no money and still paid large bonuses. Some are not around anymore. I wonder why?"
He added that he understood, however, that people were angry with bankers' actions: "I know I could slit my wrists and people would cheer."
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/money/2009/11/09/2009-11-09_goldman_ceo_says_hes_doing_gods_work.html#ixzz0WOFnpCTb
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 1:57 PM
is he really gone?
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 1:57 PM
no he's posting as stevieb, or as missmuffet somewhere. he literally logs onto all three accounts and has conversations and fights with himself in random threads, then claims people are picking on him and leaves in a hissy. it's creepy, and kinda sad actually.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 2:01 PM
Rob, please don't drag me into the 11217 mudslinging - he is not posting as me! I remain baffled by the vitriol on this site. Can't we stick to discussing the houses? I actually feel kind of sorry for this house's owner. I think he's going to lose money. On the other hand, that's what can happen when you're too greedy - ask too much at the outset and you may wind up selling for a lot less than if you came out reasonable out of the gate...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 2:09 PM
This is listed by an owner/broker. This guy is your typical delusional seller, to make things worse, he's a broker and thinks he knows everything. He was trying to rent before he put it on the market and was overpriced then too. He sighted some reovations he had done which weren't all that as to why it was worth so much. It's amazing when it comes to Real Estate how some people are so out of touch with the market, while they're so involved.
Posted by: IrieMan at November 9, 2009 2:11 PM
Miss Muffet, is this houseowner a flipper? i.e. he/she bought it as an investment/speculative property?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 2:14 PM
> is this houseowner a flipper?
No, he/she is a flopper.
Posted by: DitmasSnark at November 9, 2009 2:19 PM
I don't know the owner's personal circumstances - I can only speculate. The impression I got from visiting the house a few times was that he lived there himself with his family (there was some kid stuff around) and now has moved out, since the top unit is empty. Who knows why he's selling? There's another house being sold by Corcoran on 14th Street that's being sold mid-reno so looks like a distressed sale. And another Corcoran house (former HOTD on this list) on 13th St that's for sale that looks like it's not going to make back any money from what it was bought for in 2007 (and may very well lose money). Maybe all these sellers find they need cash now? I honestly don't know but it would seem that that's the case...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 2:19 PM
"is this houseowner a flipper?"
Well, there certainly is something fishy about the price.
(sorry, couldn't resist)
Posted by: Biff Champion at November 9, 2009 2:21 PM
So he bought at 1.2 and renovated? I am not in love with what I can see of the renovations. But in any case, in a normal NYC neighborhood, I wouldn't see getting more than this house sold for in 2005 -- unless the renovations took the house into another price bracket, but that is rarely the case and doesn't seem to be the case here.
Posted by: mopar at November 9, 2009 2:23 PM
Seller's a masochist. Please tell me the 4th story is not the cellar (damn, not even an English basement!). Sloped roof, right? Not a bad location though. But not really your ideal brownstone if that's even what it is.
Come on, idiot buyer. I know you're out there. Step up to 1.595 mil.
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 2:33 PM
Hey, let me take the target of 11217's back.
I was going to go see this place Sunday. Scary that this place is at the fringe of "reasonably priced" in Brooklyn. But that's where we are even today.
My wife and I love it in Bkln, wanted to live there for sure. But owning a brownstown was a semi-must. Or at least a 1400-1500 SF condo w/ serious outdoor space
So instead, we went back for a 2nd visit to what's almost certainly our new home:
3 story, single family federalist brownstone with central air and fully renovated with classic charm, crown moldings up the wazoo, jet-air jacuzzi tub in one BA, full wall to wall standing shower in the other...Fully renovated kitchen wirh a sweet 15x20 foot deck off it spilling into a perfectly landscaped, low maintenance 45-foot deep yard.
(Having 2 meticulous gay guys as the current owners is a BIG plus BTW if you're looking)
For this, we'll pay $965K off a peak comp of $1.3 million in 2007/2008 for identical brownstones sold on the same block. One of the best blocks in this hood. Probably top 3 or 4.
Building of this quality I estimate at asking a hyped $1.4-$1.6 million in park slope.
The catch? It's Hoboken. Snicker away. But you know what?
After 1 year of looking, we were so sick of the ridiculously overpriced properties in gentrified Park Slope it makes us ill. The $20K a year in taxes I'll save as a business owner cures a lot of ills. As does getting to live in a gorgeous building on a 100-foot deep lot.
So there's the value if anyone's looking for pristine brownstones for under a mil. 15 minutes from midtown, 25 from downtown.
Put down $235K, to get your loan to the max jumbo-conforming limit of $729K and get a ridiculously low 5.25% FIVE-POINT-TWO-FIVE PERCENT!!! 4Gs a month payment.....
And that smacks of a pretty amazing deal at the expense of brooklynites laughing
Thank you and good night, and please, feel free to send some snipes. Brooklyn real estate can really go eff itself. So Overpriced. I'll sit on the several hundred thousand dollars I just saved myself and use it to buy something else when things REALLY fall apart.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 2:42 PM
MoneyForNothing...congrats. It sounds like a great place.
BTW, there is no such thing as a Federalist brownstone; it's eaith a federal or a brownstone, two distinctly different architectures.
I'm gay so I nitpick. And you're right, gay guys will pour tons of money into a place!!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 2:46 PM
That's great MoneyForNothing, congrats in advance on what is probably your new home.
Posted by: mopar at November 9, 2009 2:50 PM
Thanks DIBS...i'll post the link once I have a contract....
So yes, a perfectly pointed federal brick front, I'm not gay so I lump em all together ;)
And man, these guys really did pour a ton into this place (owned it for 10 yrs). Slide out drawers in every single kitchen cabinet, even one of those silly spice rack slide-out things. Granite kitchen breakfast bar, one of those pull-off faucet things. They Even put a custom-built-in murphy bed in the guest BR. Oy vey!
Also has 2 working original fireplaces.
The price is insane vs the inanity we were looking at in Bklyn. When a couple w/ 550K min the bank and 300K in income isn;t really set up to buy anything other than a junk brownstone at best, somethign is wrong. We got tired waiting to find out what.
A little narrow at 15-feet, but it's laid out perfectly, and after a year and a half looking, including 60-places in brooklyn, this thing is such an amazing alternative to all the aggravation, and a super high quality piece of real estate.
I'll deal with the frat-boy mentality downtown there and keep my daughter away from them best I can.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 2:55 PM
Buying from gay guys really is the best. I agree with that. The problem with this house is that it just looks poor. It isn't grand or gracious in any way. I don't think that matters to a lot of people though, so if the price is right, and its ready to move in, someone will buy it. But not for over 1.2 million.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 2:55 PM
Good for you, moneyfornothing! Congrats!!
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 2:56 PM
I actually like the older federal style homes more than the brownstones ( ducking for cover under the desk).
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 2:57 PM
Wow--congrats MFN! Great news. Hope you will still visit us from time to time across the two rivers.
DIBS--didn't Montrose just post a story about Federal style brownstones on here last week?
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 2:58 PM
One other thing MFN, a million (or just under) in Hoboken doesn't sound like such a steal. Not bad but not the kind of deal I thought you were angling for.
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 2:59 PM
I agree; I would want as many gay guys to move into my neighborhood if I owned a house. They are great!
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 3:10 PM
dont be ashamed it's hoboken rather than park slope. for the most park hoboken is a lot cooler than park slope anyway.
and yeah, gay guys do tend to pour lots of money into their places, but often the result is overly tacky decor. and like seriously, just how many people really a built in dild0 rack in every room!?
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 3:13 PM
MFN, what are you doing about schools for your daughter? Are you sending your daughter to private school?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 3:13 PM
quote:
The price is insane vs the inanity we were looking at in Bklyn. When a couple w/ 550K min the bank and 300K in income
lol it's pretty tacky to tell people how much money you have in the bank and you and your partner's combined salary too hahahah. couldnt you have just said "it's f;ing crazy when two stinkin' rich people cant buy a crappy house in bumblef*ck brooklyn?"
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 3:15 PM
DIBS--I love the federal bricks better as well, I'm with you)
Wadser,
There comes a pt where you might not get that dramatically reduced price anytime soon. As inflated as I believe NYRE to be, I got sick of waiting. A year and a half looking (originally hoboken, then a year in brooklyn) made us realize that. A real estate correction takes 5-7 years typically, and I'm not willing to wait that long.
The part that makes it an even better deal is that the loan is at 5.25% for the max single-family rate of 729K. That is an insane bargain, and .5-.75% below the loan once you get over $729,750. Huge savings. We saw a place we really like, and financing it will literally never be cheaper.
Unless you're willing to put down another 100+K, you'll never get that loan in brooklyn now. I decided holding onto additional cash in this environment was a smart idea.
Identical properties on this block were selling at $1.275-$1.325 million in late 2007 early 2008, the peak. And this house is in pristine, and I mean pristine condition. Almost nothing to do.
So we got it at 25% off peak, and with a dirt, dirt cheap loan that will save us thousands. Maybe not the value I was looking for, but the value I will take nonetheless.
Alop, since I run my own business, NYS Unincorporated Business Tax takes another 4% on top of the 4% city tax. I'll include the $20K in annual savings I project as part of the value.
Everything's a trade off. After 18 hard months of grueling looking and hoping, this trade off felt 100% right.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 3:15 PM
Went to see this house a few weeks ago. The asking is totally delusional. The owner's layout is really disjointed feeling and, as someone else remarked, it feels small. There's something seriously off about the whole flow of the space. He seems like a nice enough (and eager to sell) guy but he needs to get a grip with the price.
Posted by: Park_loper at November 9, 2009 3:16 PM
stevieb, hoboken, and nj is NOT like nyc. public schools in new jersey are GREAT and GOOD even in the hardcore ghettoes because in NJ property tax is evaluated fairly, unlike in nyc where people who own houses pay basically nothing in property taxes, yet get tax benefits to boot! that doesnt fly in nj, which is why the schools are good. personally one of the reasons i like living in nyc is BECAUSE the public schools are bad tho lol. i just wouldnt want to live or walk near one tho
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 3:20 PM
MFN, what are you doing about schools for your daughter? Are you sending your daughter to private school?
---------------------
Ultimately, I think so, but here's the details:
Related to this, more on the value: Hoboken has state funded free preschool. My daughter starts pre-school next fall. So 3 years of saving about $10-15K a year (post tax). I'll take that every day of the week.
The deal w/ Hoboken schools is that until about 3rd or 4th grade, they're pretty good actually. Then people historically have moved out.
But I think possibly you're going to see many of the recent parents there stay for many reasons, so we'll see.
There are 2 charter schools. Not a ton of seats, but you can get in, and if you do, you're golden.
The income tax I'm saving will pay for much of the school, if not all, anyway. And honestly, unless you get a prime school district, which means REALLY paying up the nose in Brooklyn, you're likely looking at private school anyway.
ROB, not ashamed of the 'boken. Originally from Fort Lee and Edgewater as a kid. It's just not nearly as interesting culturally as Brooklyn. But it's very family friendly and has a nice walking vibe.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 3:21 PM
"public schools in new jersey are GREAT and GOOD even in the hardcore ghettoes because in NJ property tax is evaluated fairly"
ROB, unfortunately, in Hoboken, that's not the case, they're pretty bad (or typically have been). But there are 2 charters.
That's one of the drags of Hoboken, you get socked w/ NJ property taxes, but the municipality doesn't have the same quality the awful suburbs have.
Just another trade off.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 3:24 PM
Hoboken is OK, but if you were willing to go a little further into the mainland you could have gotten even better deals on houses with land, in better school districts. New Jersey is a relative bargain and though the R.E. taxes are high you don't have to pay NYS and NYC income taxes which are just brutal.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 3:25 PM
MFN--sounds great. In no way was I questioning your judgement. Just curious. And I think you articulated well the issues of waiting for prices to drop. If you have kids, who can wait 5-7 years. That is essentially the same choice I faced last year. I found a house that was well off its original ask, in a similar ball park to yours, and went for it (to many people's derision). So good luck to you. It sounds like a nice house and that loan sounds great. Monthly nut pretty damn manageable all things considered.
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 3:27 PM
Congrats MFN! The best news is you'll be close to Carlos bakery so pick me up some cannoli please (Says the girl who finally left rental Brooklyn to own in J.C.).
Posted by: TownhouseLady at November 9, 2009 3:28 PM
I don't know, MFN. What wasder said: Are you sure you're getting value? You're only paying -26% off that peak comp. Pretty consistent with where we are in Brooklyn. What can the listing rent for? What's the median/average household income? I can save 50% of a Benz's purchase price by buying a Toyota but I would still get less than what I paid at resale. Are you sure that Hoboken is the same as saving several hundred thousand?
HOBOKENROCKS!!! What think you?
If the facade looks narrower and narrower each time you visit it, "pull the emergency break". Don't forget that the rental market is still tanking. Higher rates are not a buyer's problem (price automatically corrects). Don't settle.
But congrats and good luck on a new home if you decide to strike. Patience aint for everybody.
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 3:32 PM
Thanks TL...
Italian pasteries and deli meats is one cultural upside for Hoboken, no doubt.
There's a Portuguese Piri Piri place that just opened there, which feels like a cultural awakening for the nabe, so I'll cross my fingers.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 3:34 PM
Miss Muffet, what are you doing about schools for your kids?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 3:36 PM
Hoboken is great. Congrats
Posted by: bitter_bubble_buyer at November 9, 2009 3:38 PM
"If you have kids, who can wait 5-7 years."
Financially, some families have no choice, wasder, but are still very successful in raising their kids. The idea that you have to buy is absurd. I know you knew that but I just wanted to point it out.
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 3:41 PM
Stevieb, As many people on this list know, a key reason we sold our last property was that we wanted to live in a more "prime" public school district, so we are renting in one now, and have our oldest in that school. We have to be careful with our youngest - that is, she has no guarantee of a variance, so in looking to buy again, we have to choose to live in a place that has a decent back-up school in case she does not get into our older kid's school. Or, we could keep renting in our current place til she gets in, and then we're "free" to live anywhere (though we are also trying to understand the middle school issues, though it's hard to plan around DOE rules may change by time we get to that point).
Congrats MFN. I hear what you're saying about the long slog to find a place. I am still amazed by the ballsy asking prices on lots of places, but at least am comforted when the actual selling prices reflect things coming down. Prime hoods are still expensive, but the direction of the market is definitely continuing to head down, so I think potential buyers, especially those with cash, are in a good position. But yes, one must be patient.
If I knew NJ more, I'd consider it but for various reasons (read: husband) we are committed to Brooklyn which I don't mind since we are fortunate enough to at least be in the ballpark of being able to buy a house here, and I do like this city. But I can *totally* see why others would choose alternatives - there are great ones out there, and Jersey sounds like one of them.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 3:46 PM
"The idea that you have to buy is absurd. I know you knew that but I just wanted to point it out."
Should have said, for those with kids who want to buy, who can wait 5-7 years. How is that BHO? Nobody has to do anything of course but as we have discussed ad nauseum if one is in the market and wants to buy and doesn't want to move from rental to rental for their children's childhoods, time is somewhat of the essence. But to each their own.
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 3:50 PM
Also, in my case, I was concerned about the massive tax liability from the sale of our coop...
Posted by: wasder at November 9, 2009 3:51 PM
"You're only paying -26% off that peak comp. Pretty consistent with where we are in Brooklyn. "
--------
Agreed, but BHO, I was not willing to continue to wait (who knows how long) to *maybe* get another 10-15% off peak. And post 25% peak in brooklyn is still an INSANE amount of money, and nothing I would consider. I suspect brooklyn falls harder than Hoboken, which is only a one-square mile town. There's very very little brownstone inventory.
Rates are just so damn low, and getting below the max conforming limit was a big hope for me (saving abt 500 bucks a month in interest by doing so). So you pull the trigger.
Monthly payment is $4K ($3200 of it is deductible for the first 7-10 years), plus $1K prop tax (40% deductible). So you're looking at post-tax $3,100 or so to own this place. Way less stress to own, and 15-ft wide or not, after 12 years in a 600SF rent stabilized apt, believe me, it's plenty large.
I do think it's going to drop more, fully expect it. But in the end it's a very high quality property on a prime block. We're in it for 10 years at least, so not so concerned.
In the meantime, we saved ourselves a very serious sum of non-retirement cash that we can deploy elsewhere if bargains appear.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 3:53 PM
Hi Miss Muffet, thanks for the feedback. It sounds like a very viable option could be to keep renting until your youngest gets into the school that you want. After that, you can buy somewhere else where you get more for the buck. You could probably buy 5 brownstones on stuyvesant street in bed stuy for the same money. LOL
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 3:54 PM
Wasder, my understanding is that there is no tax issue if you sell your primary residence, as long as you don't make more than 250K per individual or 500K as a couple in capital gains. I believe you used to have to buy again within 5 years, but I think that's no longer even the case. With rents soft, and landlords eager to keep good tenants, I don't think families really have to worry very much about going from "rental to rental" in this climate. For me, money is much more of the essence if I can save a few hundred grand by waiting a bit longer to buy!
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 3:55 PM
The "Heights" In Jersey City has nice brownstones. I haven't been there in years though and don't know what it's like now. Hopefully it was landmarked protected. Another adorable town in Jersey is South Orange. The street lights are still gas lights. It has good early-20th century houses. All those old communter towns have good housing stock and ancient old trees. High re taxes though. Worth it if you have kids.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 3:58 PM
Capn (Underpants) of Team Bear throws in the towel and buys the Toyota thinking it was a Benz (as described by ex-fellow bear). So much for your headwinds / tailwinds bs, eh? how many comps did you see at that peak price? i hope you saw more than one idiot buyer overpaying, otherwise your 26% discount might really only be 10-15%, especially if the comps weren't perfect (have you really seen them?). i can hear the jersey bloggers from hear hollering about the stupid idiot overpaying in hoboken. i thought that market was off 30% anyway? it's an endless cycle, really. but you've just become the latest victim.
thanks for the income and bank statement infor mfn. i have to say rob 315p was his best comment i have seen him/her/it make. but i'm sure your hoboken dinner party guests will enjoy such exchanges of 1040 info in the future.
goodluck in jersey. if you hadn't been such an a**hole in the past i might even mean it.
Posted by: antidope at November 9, 2009 4:03 PM
Antidope, there is no need for such hate-filled vitriol in your post. MFN was kind enough to share his decision with us and made us all more educated about the housing market as a result. Why did you have to flame him?
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 4:09 PM
"Rates are just so damn low..."
That's one of the reasons why prices are still so damn high. Pay less on a higher principal or pay more on a lower principal. But you can exploit the overshoot below equilibrium as that is where the downward momentum will take us when rates spike. RE will become undervalued again.
"$3,100 or so to own this place"
Not necessarily. Add hypothetical loss divided by hypothetical months of ownership.
"We're in it for 10 years at least..."
That too is hypothetical. Consider the risk of having to sell - relocation, etc. (I know you did but I'm just putting it out there for those who are reading).
"sum of non-retirement cash that we can deploy elsewhere if bargains appear."
That's the spirit!
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 4:11 PM
now there's a real man's bear. that's it, stick to your guns.
Posted by: antidope at November 9, 2009 4:13 PM
Miss Muffet, what do u think about getting together with other like-minded individuals with families looking to buy in brooklyn? (we can leave the perma bulls out)
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 4:16 PM
I'm sure MFN is a much happier person in life than either BHO or antidope.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 4:16 PM
Yeah antidope, why the meanness? I don't get why folks have to be so nasty on here. And OK, so MFN shared his financial info, but this is an anonymous list - very different than discussing that stuff point blank at a dinner party. What difference does it really make when we're all anonymous? Frankly, I find that kind of candor revealing, and appreciate when people are forthright.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 4:17 PM
Antidope:
It's about willingness to wait. Moving to pay rent for 1 or 2 years to see how things shake out makes little sense when I'm getting 20K a year in taxes saved and buying 25% below peak. Oh, and 3 years of free preschool saving me about 30-45K. If that's throwing in the towel, then so be it. But it's clear I'm nowhere near peak buy, and for the trade-off to live in a 3-story brownstone w/ a 60-foot backyard and deck, call me Roberto Duran.
If you know one thing about me (and you know little), you know I did my research. I had 11 years of every single and multi-family home sale in Hoboken printed out for me a year ago. I know where the best blocks are, and I know what people paid for every property that was transacted in that time. So, yeah, I have *kind-a* seen the comps in this nabe.
The 3 most recent sales at peak on the same block in question are literally the same exact specs, and considering the place we're looking at has a full renovation on every floor, I'll assume they are equal quality at best.
Plus their mortgages are probably 1.5-2% higher vs comp 30-year fixed if you want to throw that into the cost of ownership at peak.
No delusion that this is a prime Bklyn townhouse, so not calling it a Benz, calling it a way more sensible value vs the absurdity of brooklyn real estate.
I do like however that I'm the a-hole, when if you look, I've never instigated any personal attack, just been pretty blunt abt how overpriced brooklyn is. Been pretty unsentimental about the US economy and financial steroids. But there's always someone like you willing to throw a swing, and when they do I throw back hard, I throw back smug. And yeah, then I *am* knid of an assh*le about it.
And re: the bank statement info, none of you know me, have never met or seen me, so I consider it not rude at all to share. It's information anyone in a similar financial situation can use to help their own thinking.
I tell all my personal friends I'm having financial trouble and ask if they can loan me money so I don't seem like such a dou*hebag.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:18 PM
Stevieb - I must confess I've always avoided the brownstoner get-togethers. There is so much vitriol on this list (which I find alternately weird and slightly creepy) that I like to stay anonymous! Plus, with little kids and a demanding job, I'm usually home at night - working, resting, cleaning or taking care of life stuff, or looking at real estate listings while my kiddies sleep!!
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 4:20 PM
"ex-fellow bear"
antibigyellowbus didn't realize that MFN remains a bear.
"I do think it's going to drop more, fully expect it...we can deploy elsewhere if bargains appear."
Growl!
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 4:20 PM
Yeah antidope, why the meanness? I don't get why folks have to be so nasty on here. And OK, so MFN shared his financial info, but this is an anonymous list - very different than discussing that stuff point blank at a dinner party. What difference does it really make when we're all anonymous? Frankly, I find that kind of candor revealing, and appreciate when people are forthright.
Posted by: Miss Muffett at November 9, 2009 4:17 PM
If he weren't such an assh*le, I'd say we should feel badly for him because he had it rough growing up, and I'd probably mean it....;)
And thanks for seeing my pt on financials Miss Muffet. He's so upset about it because Antidope, ironically = just another hater.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:21 PM
This is a good time to buy real estate. I agree with MFN. Even though it is probable that prices will come down further, the dollar will drop even further. Pretty soon all the dollars we have socked away in the bank or in our 401K's won't be enough to buy us socks. Better to put money into real estate and durable goods. At least when push comes to shove you will have a place to live and something to drive.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 4:23 PM
mean? pls. don't get me started.
as i recall, he was the jackal laughing at all the idiot buyers.
then he morphed into i make so much $$$ i will skin these (previous) idiot owners. (btw, he's waived his bank statements and 1040s around here multiple times.)
finally, humbled(?) into going long on real estate.
to top it off, he does it anonymously, which makes him open and forthright.
whatever.
Posted by: antidope at November 9, 2009 4:23 PM
DIBS, agreed. MFN found a way to be happy. I am frankly envious of him.
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 4:24 PM
This thread is just appalling. How some of you posters think you can endlessly troll and and try to ruin the experience for a sincere sharer like Miss M is just not acceptable. You wanna get status on this blog?? Have people give pause when they see a fresh post from you? Here's some advice, guess some of you are too dumb to figure it out for yourselves (antidope and stevieb): post for six months your comments and listen and weigh people's opinions. Stick your negative attitudes up your asses.
Posted by: infinitejester at November 9, 2009 4:25 PM
antidope, be a playa and not a playa hater, dog!
Posted by: stevieb at November 9, 2009 4:26 PM
The get togethers are fun. Everybody gets along, talks about things in a sane and rational manner, leaves the bad parts of their blog personas at home and generally drinks a lot
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 4:29 PM
quote:
3 years of free preschool
whoa. pre-school is THREE years now? wtf? it was 1/2 a day for a year for me. so new jersey pays for three years of babysitting!?!? no wonder the taxes are really that high. peoples taxes shouldnt be going to send a kid to PRE school for THREE years. wtf? get a nanny or something.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 4:30 PM
Yes, I am still a bear. I'll just be a far less frustrated one.
Dope was just waiting for one to crack so he could snipe.
Too bad hater, going to live in a fu*king sweet townhouse my little daughter will run around like crazy in and giggle her head off. I'll be having cocktails on my deck soaking in my super-deep backyard.
And I spent less than half my non-retirement savings to do it.
Hate on that.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:30 PM
I never went to preschool and look how I turned out.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 4:31 PM
She enters at 2 (2.5), kindergarten starts at 5, correct. So 2-3, 3-4, 4-5...
Might be 2 years though, Mom's in charge of the school details.
Still, I'll take the savings for 2 years!
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:32 PM
This is a good time to buy real estate. I agree with MFN. Even though it is probable that prices will come down further, the dollar will drop even further. Pretty soon all the dollars we have socked away in the bank or in our 401K's won't be enough to buy us socks. Better to put money into real estate and durable goods. At least when push comes to shove you will have a place to live and something to drive.
Posted by: Minard Lafever at November 9, 2009 4:23 PM
Minard,
This also played HEAVILY into my thinking...if Inflation picks up heavily, RE will not come down nearly as hard. That's just another one of these ridiculous maybes in a steroid-induced economy. Just too hard to know how it will play out.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:34 PM
quote:
Too bad hater, going to live in a fu*king sweet townhouse my little daughter will run around like crazy in and giggle her head off. I'll be having cocktails on my deck soaking in my super-deep backyard.
LOL so youre getting drunk outside while your daughter is running up and down all those steps? parent of the year!! (im jk btw, i just found that post funny)
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at November 9, 2009 4:34 PM
MFN, when I made the decision to sell my Manhattan condo in 2007, I knew prices were high. No way in hell was I going to chase BH, PS or BoCoCa prices. But I had my heart set on a brownstone and it was totally by chance that I discpovered bed Stuy...plus the A train is far better than the F. LOL
I paid about half what i would have had to in Ft greene and less than a third anywhere more expensive. I got a great big fully renovated brownstone on one of the best streets (stuyvesant Ave)...i had to put in the deck myself and of course the ensuite master bath (shillstoner, you out there??) but I don't regret any part of the whole process.
I too can go through financial arguments for it as I gave up $5000 in taxes and $6,000 in CCs in exchange for $2000 in taxes and $14,400 in rental income!!!
Whatever amount my house is below what I have in it makes me perfectly happy.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 4:36 PM
"This is a good time to buy real estate."
Wrong.
"Pretty soon all the dollars we have socked away in the bank or in our 401K's won't be enough to buy us socks."
1/2 cash, 1/2 gold (with exit strategy) solves that problem.
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 4:37 PM
"he was the jackal laughing at all the idiot buyers."
Wasn;t laughing at them. You really are an idiot, Antidope. And RE the bank statement shit, this is an anonymous blog. You're just a hater, my friend. It's general information. I would never hang out with you, but if I did, I wouldn;t tell you how much I earn.
I was saying that people who bought in the last few years thought they were probably buying low...but that the market is still correcting.
This was always said to point out people who try to hype the market...I don;t believe I've ever called a buyer stupid, though others have. They jsut overpaid. My goal was to knockdown the Team Bull argument.
I remain a Bear on real estate and the US economy.
I am willing to overpay some here because of how much money I am saving in taxes and pre-school. 50-70K in the first 2 years alone.
And my life will be sop much happier now that I don;t have to visit real estate blogs with miserable dipsh*ts like you. Honestly. backyard aside, that may be the single biggest quality of life improvement I just bought myself.
Godnight.
Posted by: MoneyForNothing at November 9, 2009 4:40 PM
And yet from the March bottom, the stock market has gone up more than gold.
You have missed a HUGE opportunity, BHO.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at November 9, 2009 4:41 PM
adios.
infinite, thanks for putting me in the rubber room. ouch.
Posted by: antidope at November 9, 2009 4:45 PM
Congrats M4N. Sounds like a sweet house.
But a million dollar 15' house in the fringe (Hoboken)really doesn't sound any better than a more expensive house in Brooklyn. Not trying to be a hater, just a team bear on this.
Posted by: denton at November 9, 2009 4:48 PM
from the butcher block thread....
"test
Posted by: Return of The What at November 9, 2009 4:30 PM"
Posted by: randolph at November 9, 2009 4:56 PM
"You have missed a HUGE opportunity, BHO."
And a HUGE risk.
***Bid half off peak comps***
Posted by: Brownstones Half Off at November 9, 2009 5:11 PM
"But a million dollar 15' house in the fringe (Hoboken)really doesn't sound any better than a more expensive house in Brooklyn. Not trying to be a hater, just a team bear on this."
Denton- Some might say the very same of those who bought in "fringe" nabes in Brooklyn vs. Manhattan.
Now, you all know that I love Brooklyn dearly but reality check- it's not the only great place to live.
Posted by: TownhouseLady at November 9, 2009 5:23 PM
Wow, I picked a bad day to be in meetings (and to stop sniffing glue).
Posted by: Brokedeveloper at November 9, 2009 5:30 PM
MFN
Thanks for sharing your info.
It's interesting to hear of your home-buying journey.
Congratulations, and good luck in beautiful Hoboken!
Posted by: Pigeon at November 9, 2009 5:32 PM
I feel like these smaller houses south of 9th st feel like because they are less than $2m, they can always stretch the ask to $1.5m territory. This one is over $750/sqft. $600/sqft, max. And that gets us right to the collective widget estimate of $1.2m.
443 11th St & 431 10th St are both GUT reno jobs and they are asking over $600/sqft. Delusional.
Posted by: PShousehunter at November 9, 2009 7:51 PM
Is 443 11th street listed any where? I can't find the listing.
Posted by: stevieb at November 10, 2009 11:11 AM
443 11th: http://www.adshayerealty.com/PropertyDetails.aspx?pid=1698&purl=%2fBuy.aspx
Posted by: PShousehunter at November 10, 2009 2:22 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.