« Copter Rage in Brooklyn Heights New Grocery and Coffee Shop To Open on Underhill »
October 26, 2009
NYT: Food Co-op Exile's Story Demands 2,000 Words
Comrades, a new bar has just been set for Park Slope Food Co-op navel gazing: "For such a scrutinized institution, little public attention is paid to people like me—co-op failures and near-failures who have struggled to stay in good standing and have stumbled in the cramped aisles. Like every other aspect of the much-loved and much-hated co-op, the topic of members in trouble draws a bushel of opinions. An organic bushel, of course...The co-op, a place that raises aspirations for society, makes us raise aspirations for ourselves. I am still suspended, but imagine myself someday returning and remaining in good standing. Nostalgically, I envision old friends and former roommates in the aisles, examining the white nectarines. But I wonder: couldn’t it be a little mellower?" —Flunking Out at the Food Co-op
Photo by Betty Blade.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.brownstoner.com/mte/mt-tb.cgi/12012
Comments
...about to invoke Godwin's Law
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 11:05 AM
First thing I thought reading that article last Friday was, "This thing is long enough to have the 'single page' option?"
Posted by: infinitejester at October 26, 2009 11:06 AM
no offense gabby, but i could barely read/understand what you just said :-/
could someone translate?
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 11:08 AM
Gabby's only writing was the title and the first sentence. That largely-unintelligible mass of words was a quote from a NYT article.
Posted by: dreamking at October 26, 2009 11:12 AM
i wasnt make fun of gabby, i was just confused about what the heck that all said/meant. ill re-read it i guess.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 11:16 AM
in order for 3 hours a month to even begin to make sense, you have to also figure out the opportunity cost. if you make $75 per hour lets say, then 3 hours there costs $225. how much can you really save?
Posted by: wine lover at October 26, 2009 11:18 AM
Why didn't the writer start an good old fashioned bare knuckled fist fight when the she was forbidden entry? I thought that's how they settled things at the coop.
Posted by: IMBY at October 26, 2009 11:19 AM
wine lover, a fresh and original point there!
Posted by: infinitejester at October 26, 2009 11:24 AM
i think im going to go to the halloween store and buy a buncgh of stink bombs and start throwing them into the co-op when i pass by it. why not? fyi: stink bombs are just that. STINK bombs. not real bombs. they are totally legal.
ugh now im an organic terrorist
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 11:25 AM
Exactly, Wine Lover. Considering our freelancer/consultant quotes that's how we'd have to calculate it. And if you have to do two extra shifts after missing one? For EACH adult in the household? Forget it. Not possible for us. It's clear looking at the huge number of members they have and hearing these stories they need to require fewer hours of members. It's surely been proposed. Probably some very rigid board members are shooting it down.
Posted by: traditionalmod at October 26, 2009 11:32 AM
"if you make $75 per hour lets say, then 3 hours there costs $225. how much can you really save?"
Don't forget that "all adult members of the household" must work, so if you are married or have a roommate, that's 6 hours.
"If you live with other adults with whom you share food and/or household products, then all of you must join the Coop together. Under certain circumstances, the Coop may make an exception to this policy. If you think your living situation constitutes an exception to the household policy, please talk with the person who assists you with joining the Coop. The Coop will not make exceptions to the household policy for (1) parents and adult children nor (2) spouses/domestic partners/couples who live together. People who have the above living arrangements must always join the Coop as households whether or not they intend to share Coop products."
Fresh Direct, on the other hand, only requires a credit card and internet access.
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 11:37 AM
Why is this chick whining? Either follow the rules or don't work at the co-op. Give me a break.
Posted by: East New York at October 26, 2009 11:37 AM
I thought the article was interesting and it justifies my decision to avoid the coop like the plague. Winelover hits the nail on the head. Those couple of hours a month are worth more to me than I could ever save on groceries.
Posted by: Brownstonebabe at October 26, 2009 11:39 AM
The calculation of professional salary into value of groceries is kind of strange to me. Do you not go play in the park for a couple of hours because you could be earning income instead? The jobs at the co-op aren't rocket science. I find my shift is actually fun.
Posted by: Jeff Ave at October 26, 2009 11:40 AM
Nevermind $75/hr. What about a more modest sum of $40/hr. That's $120 a month! There's no way you're "saving" that much. And if you are, you're you're just breaking even.... and you're probably spending WAY too much on food and throwing a lot away. Tsk tsk. Very wasteful.
And if you stick with a $12/hr rate that you might make working a real job in a store... it's $36/month which *is* probably in the ballpark of how much you're saving. The difference is, if you actually worked at a shop they might hire you to work more than 3 hrs per month and (a) you might become proficient at your tasks and (b) they would actually pay you.
All that said, I guess the typical "creative professional" doesn't get to 'connect' with their community very much and have the chance to work in retail. So, I guess the opportunity to "feel" how the other side lives is worth far more than the discount on food!!
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 11:41 AM
quote:
"If you live with other adults with whom you share food and/or household products, then all of you must join the Coop together
LOL omfg seriously? then every adult who has a crotchfruit should have to put in 1/2 the amount of an hour. wtf? seriously what a bunch of loons
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 11:42 AM
I know a couple of families who make their teenage kids serve their hours. This is the only time this place makes sense to me...
Posted by: Ringo at October 26, 2009 11:45 AM
Doesn't the opportunity cost argument only work when you have that opportunity/choice? Most people working, I imagine, are doing it in their off-time, not forgoing a chance to work at some hourly job.
This co-op this is sooooo played-out and tired. Don't like it, don't go. If awesome quality groceries at great prices aren't worth it, don't go. If you (the writer) find it so hard to abide by the 1 rule of actually showing up once a month to your agreed-upon shift, which is what makes the co-op operate, don't join. Go to Key Food. There are way too many members to have to deal with a bunch of whiny babies.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 11:46 AM
By the way... the article is actually 2,300 words. Thank gawd this woman teaches *poetry* at Hunter. I certainly hope she's not teaching prose and expository writing!!
Someone should share this article with her department chair. I hope she doesn't include this as a writing sample in her tenure dossier. It won't help! :-)
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 11:48 AM
Also... there are supposedly 15,000 members? That means there are 45,000 monthly hours that are supposed to be worked. The place only operates about 450 hours per month. That means there is a 100 : 1 ratio of man hours to operational hours?!
The building can't fit that many people. Something is completely doesn't add up here!!
At any given hour there are 33+ members floating around "working"??! Are you kidding me?
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 11:57 AM
Is this news? I'm tired of reading all these insipid articles about Park Slope. Maybe the Times should hire reporters who live in other neighborhoods so that we can get some real stories.
Though this article is completely obnoxious, as a coop member, I do question the logic of maintaining the same work requirements when number of members has soared. It's absolute mayhem in the office and no one knows what they're doing because there's too many people to train.
Posted by: bklyn1977 at October 26, 2009 11:58 AM
Sounds poorly managed.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 12:05 PM
I'm not a coop member and don't plan on joining because I don't live close enough for it to be worth it time wise, plus I have other options that are reasonably close in price and quality. What I don't understand is why people are snotty enough to thumb their noses at the writer's words and to suggest that everyone who shops in Park Slope or surrounding areas makes $75 an hour. Now if that's a consultant's fee and you only can bill 3 hours a day that's one thing, but if you're making over $125,000 a year then you shouldn't complain about sacrificing 3 hours a week.
I prefer to drive to Fairway...that's me, but I found the article very interesting. I have friends who have said similar things about the coop and not in terms of missing their shifts, but in terms of the "standing around" jobs that don't accomplish anything. If I had any criticism of the article it'd be that the writer quotes her friends instead of conducting interviews with random member.s
Posted by: bornandbredinbk at October 26, 2009 12:11 PM
I'm not a coop member and don't plan on joining because I don't live close enough for it to be worth it time wise, plus I have other options that are reasonably close in price and quality. What I don't understand is why people are snotty enough to thumb their noses at the writer's words and to suggest that everyone who shops in Park Slope or surrounding areas makes $75 an hour. Now if that's a consultant's fee and you only can bill 3 hours a day that's one thing, but if you're making over $125,000 a year then you shouldn't complain about sacrificing 3 hours a week.
I prefer to drive to Fairway...that's me, but I found the article very interesting. I have friends who have said similar things about the coop and not in terms of missing their shifts, but in terms of the "standing around" jobs that don't accomplish anything. If I had any criticism of the article it'd be that the writer quotes her friends instead of conducting interviews with random members.
Posted by: bornandbredinbk at October 26, 2009 12:11 PM
I have said it before: the coop would be better served if it expanded and added locations than how it is now. But it won't do that. So instead it is this cultish thing. I had no idea that missing shifts added to your work hours, though. That is insane.
And from my one trip inside (as a guest, and yes, both the member and I had to show id), I have to say it was so damn crowded on a Tuesday afternoon that I have no idea how anyone can shop there who has a normal 9 to 5 job.
Posted by: Heather at October 26, 2009 12:14 PM
Obviously the work requirement is satisfying some ideological desire.
Or else it is just like fraternity hazing... "I had to go through it so everyone has to go through it even worse!" sort of thing.
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 12:17 PM
"I had no idea that missing shifts added to your work hours, though. That is insane."
Correction: your work hours don't increase. If you miss your shift, you have to do 2 shifts to make it up. Reasonable because if you only just had to make 1 shift up some other time, you'd have no incentive to go to your regular shift if you didn't feel like it. You'd just go whenever you pleased. Thus, 2 makeups forces you to actually show up when you're supposed to. (negative reinforcement)
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 12:18 PM
75 BUCKS AN HOUR!
haha
lala land.
its a fucking grocery store. They wouldn't pay you 8 bucks an hour if you knew everything there was to know about onions. Don't expect your stupid inflated income to translate.
Posted by: Santa at October 26, 2009 12:25 PM
I love the Flatbush food Co-op because I can shop there without having to work there.
In your face, Slopers!
Posted by: DitmasSnark at October 26, 2009 12:26 PM
That's what bugs me, tyber. They can't possibly use 33 workers every hour, but everyone has to do a shift as a matter of their wacky, outdated principles. I'm sure they could get away with one shift per household, or shifts every other month, but that doesn't seem to be on the table.
Posted by: tinarina at October 26, 2009 12:26 PM
For most co-op members, it isn't solely about the great prices, fresh (mostly local and organic) produce, and good selection of natural foods, it's also about the camaraderie that comes from the experience of knowing that you and all of your fellow-members, who come from all walks of life, are treated identically, and that you are all working together to support the organization. Too crunchy granola for you? Don't join. Seriously, everything in life isn't about money.
Posted by: babs at October 26, 2009 12:27 PM
Did anyone catch the 'makeup' terms? Talk about freakin' predatory penalties. It's like they're designed to get people out of circulation. Miss 2 sessions and you start falling into a black hole of hours owed. They really should change this regressive, punitive approach. It indirectly pegs labor at a certain rate to start, and devalues that rate for anyone who defaults. It's as if they counting on defaults and make-up work at some point in the past, as a buffer to ensure the time-sensitive work would always be done. Nowadays, there's too much labor going around but the mechanism for an old problem is still in place. (I'd love to see their stats on how many hours are done as a result of penalties.)
If they're overstaffed, there are TONS of things they can do reduce the ambient tension.
Start offering to have 20% of the membership pay a premium to not work. Pay a $400 annual premium to not work. Offer it to members in order of membership seniority, until you hit the 20% mark. They'd be making 1.2 million more a year, and reduce the overall labor pool at the same time. Use that money for a pool to either improve the store or buy/lease new real estate. Adjust the numbers accordingly, to ensure the labor requirements are being met.
Or make it a temporary event, for the specific purpose of amassing the capital to purchase larger property (or expand/improve the existing building).
Put all this scheduling nonsense online. No way at all they couldn't find a developer who'd devote their time to an online scheduling system - you could probably get people to do it using their hours, as a special project. All these horrible interactions, on the basis of written documentation or spoken conversations, creates bottlenecks and guarantees frustration on a larger scale than necessary.
There would be fewer people in the stores if online orders could be submitted, fulfilled with all this extra labor, and bagged for pickup. Payments could be done online to ensure food doesn't go to waste. Disabled or senior citizens within a certain range might be able to get home bike delivery.
An excess of cheap labor isn't anything to be sneezed at, or wasted.
Posted by: dreamking at October 26, 2009 12:35 PM
BSD -- it's not negative reinforcement. It's *punishment* to be precise. It's a negative condition is introduced or experienced as a consequence of the behavior. It weakens the behavior of *missing* your shift, but doesn't reinforce the going to your shift.
Also, since there are 33+ workers per hour... does that include 2:00pm on Wednesday and 10:30am on Friday? Are all members also required to have "flex time" at work? Or is the reality that mid-day it is all real employees and in the evenings and weekends there are actually more like 60+ members standing around with their thumbs up their butts?
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 12:36 PM
dreamking, it's obviously not run/managed by anyone who gives an ounce about making any money. Don't expect any rational decisions to be made.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 12:42 PM
Dreamking -- they have cart walkers anyway, so delivery shouldn't be a problem. I'm sure the "pay not to work" is counter to their ethos, but using the labor to be "shoppers" like Fresh Direct makes A LOT of sense. Place an order online, the member "shopper" can call you if there's a problem with the order (out of stock, etc.), and have your groceries show up at your door in a few hours. They must have inventory control and such already, right? So that's linked to the web.
Not rocket science... though, actually, which is harder? Rocket science or computer science?
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 12:44 PM
agree that the place sounds poorly managed and that the incentives are kind of bizarre. but it's not as if this is some big secret - i've lived near the coop for about a year and don't actually know anyone personally who is a member, and yet not one single word of the article was a surprise. what comes through most loudly in the article is the author's ridiculous sense of entitlement to break the rules and not pay the price, even though she clearly knows what that price is in advance, and has no reason why she shouldn't have to pay it. hence her delight at the lady at the greenmarket who let her walk away with a pie based on her word alone. 'cuz we all know that the author deserves to get her pie without paying the entire price for it, and definitely, absolutely, is gonna come back with that $4.
Posted by: i disagree at October 26, 2009 12:49 PM
obviously the place has been running for years just fine. if don't like it don't go. who cares anyway?
why do people love to hate on it? just because it is not conventional? can't handle anything different?
I've never belonged but I did go in there once maybe 20 years ago. just not my thing but so what.
Posted by: Petebklyn at October 26, 2009 12:54 PM
tybur6, youre right, its not really negative reinforcement, but you get the point.
It is also true that there are often too many workers just hanging around. The difficulty I'm told, in implementing a new solution is apparently the need to reprogram the computer/calendaring system.
Look, its not a perfect place, but its clearly got something going for it given that it's been around and growing since '73?
The funniest thing is that this neighborhood of lefties and socialist types who complain about corporate world and the need for community involvement, have it in the co-op, but then bitch that its not run like a Wal-Mart.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 12:55 PM
Dreamking, your solution might be efficient and elegant, but wouldn't satisfy the bloodlust and komradship feel of the Politburo. Seriously, I thought the essay could have been about any academia-led venture: nonsensical policies, bureaucratic and paper-intensive, designed to satisfy the intense cravings for intellectual dissent. I am reminded of all the splinter Trotskyist student groups of yore.
Posted by: Maly at October 26, 2009 12:55 PM
quote:
who come from all walks of life
that's lolsy. if you think the people who shop at the coop come from "all walks of life" you are insane.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 1:08 PM
maybe just the way all organizations are by nature. Food coop, condo board, corporations, goverment, utility company , civic club, fraternal org, military, etc, etc etc.
Posted by: Petebklyn at October 26, 2009 1:11 PM
amen petebrooklyn.
join or don't, stay or don't, who cares!!! this has got to be the most played out topic in all brooklyn journalism. i think the only article left to write is WHY does the coop arouse such negative emotions among those who never join or who join and leave? i am a member for a very long time and it works beautifully for me -- why are you so intent on convincing me that i'm just plain wrong about that? what's your goal -- to get me to quit? to stop other people from joining? why would that be important to you?
Posted by: southbrooklyn at October 26, 2009 1:13 PM
"it's obviously not run/managed by anyone who gives an ounce about making any money"
someone missed the point.
Posted by: amt230 at October 26, 2009 1:19 PM
It is true not all walks of life shop there. The more affluent you are, the less likely you are to shop there. There are many many low income folks that are coop members though, and many many people for whom it is only a community or a 'social' choice, and who forget that it is out of necessity for some other folks.
Posted by: coopfornow at October 26, 2009 1:22 PM
Hahahaha! "The difficulty I'm told, in implementing a new solution is apparently the need to reprogram the computer/calendaring system."
Because we all know there are no members whose time could be spend doing this rather than walking empty carts back to the store or "greeting" the customers. Jaysus. It's like they're trying to be backassward.
If I lived in the neighborhood, I think that's why I wouldn't be a member. It's one thing to *shop* at a badly managed store, but to be required to work there!? ugggh.
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 1:27 PM
amt230 -- No, I think you missed the point. While the exact wording is not precise ("making money"), DIBS is right on. The PRIMARY goal of the coop should be to reduce expenses while increasing products/variety/pleasantness of experience.
While they are not necessarily looking at "profits" per se, they sure as hell better be looking at making money!!
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 1:30 PM
"it's obviously not run/managed by anyone who gives an ounce about making any money"
someone missed the point.
Posted by: amt230 at October 26, 2009 1:19 PM
This is exactly the problem with most not-for-profit organizations. If they were managed on a P&L basis, they would be much more efficient, whether there was a goal of making a profit or not.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 1:32 PM
dreamking, spot on.
"If you need me, me and Neil'll be
hanging out with the Dream King
Neil said hi, by the way."
Posted by: infinitejester at October 26, 2009 1:34 PM
A few years ago, I went to the coop intent on joining. However, I thought the place was batshit crazy and ran away fast.
There is a certain logic in the "if you dont like it, dont go" argument. However, I think the coop is unrealistic that its backwards ways wont invite some scorn. They dont take credit cards b/c they dont want their members to go into debt (or something)?
It's clear that they have a lot of goals, but serving the community isnt one of them.
Posted by: slick at October 26, 2009 1:43 PM
I love how the very mention of the co-op on this site puts people in a foul mood. Relax! 98% of members are NORMAL PEOPLE who want to eat well and feel that the supermarkets in our fair city really suck-which lets face it is true.When I go into a regular supermarket I'm shocked by the lame produce and high prices. I do shop at trader joe's but their fresh produce is not great. For me it's a no-brainer- great stuff at low prices but it's not for everybody. So there-diffrent strokes.....
Posted by: jib at October 26, 2009 1:44 PM
I haven't worked in a grocery store since I was in high school and don't plan to do so again if I can help it. I am unwilling to make the commitment to work three hours a month for me and my spouse, therefore, I don't join the coop. The math is not that hard. If membership of the coop has value to you, you follow the rules. Skipping out on your shift is like deciding you're not going to pay the rent/mortgage/maintenance this month - it's an option, but it has serious consequences. I walked past the coop at 11.30 a.m. yesterday, it was packed to the gills and there was a line of people waiting to get in. I'll stick to Costco and Key Foods thanks.
Posted by: bohuma at October 26, 2009 1:46 PM
@southbrooklyn - I think this is how the process works. People complain about stuff. It raises the conversation amongst more people. Some respond with how everything's fine (or fine enough). Eventually, hopefully, some ideas or actions are set in motion that may or may not improve the situation.
It's not that serious people want anyone to stop going. They see some problems, want things to get better, and they're not getting better on their own.
You don't need to have a profit motive to want to make things better, or to grasp the idea that labor actually has a dollar value. Once you do, it becomes possible to plan better. It doesn't mean you have to judge all things (e.g., community service, maintaining a large-scale vegan-friendly shopping environment) as having a dollar value, but things do have a cost because they're still part of the real world.
However people motivate themselves to give up their labor on a consistent basis, it's the labor that allows the co-op to function. And that labor, in general, seems to be going to waste. It's not being respected, in aggregate, as much as it could be while still continuing to fuel the ethos behind the co-op's mission. When you start to not really care about the value of people's labor and time, that's how you get to places like this. It stops mattering how many hours are spent training/retraining. It ceases to matter you're making people chase/compete with each other for viable work slots. (Many people out of a pool of 15,000 - not all - have a hard time fulfilling even a measly 2.75 hour/month requirement if the only slots open out of 440 are Tues-Thurs 1pm-4pm.)
I'm sure most people are fine with the way things are now, but a sizable group are not. It doesn't make them evil, morally weak, or stupid. They're part of the community, and their concerns deserve a fair hearing. But reading the comments both here, gothamist and in NYT, what seems to be happening is that the population squeeze just encourages the motivated to push complainers to shut up or leave. They're encouraging people to ratchet up the motivation to overcome obstacles rather than see if the obstacles can, in good faith, be removed or smoothed over.
This is a bad sign. It means the improvement feedback process is in trouble, either due to a failure of leadership or due to institutional bottlenecks. Saying this out loud doesn't make you a traitor to The Cause, or ideologically impure.
I don't claim to have the answers to all this, but I've learned to be a little skeptical when people start saying, "Love it or Leave it". It's fine enough to dismiss un-serious people, or those with anti- co-op agendas. It's not fine to lump all 'complainers' in the same category.
Posted by: dreamking at October 26, 2009 1:48 PM
Slick - They don't take credit cards because it costs a percentage to process which would get passed on to members. They do take debit cards.
Enough already. It seems most of the people complaining are not members. It's working well enough for 15,000 members which is more than enough. No need to be so offended by it if you're not a member.
Posted by: Bklnite at October 26, 2009 1:52 PM
quote:
There are many many low income folks that are coop members though
BULL-SH*T! and stay at home mommy's dont count as low income.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 1:57 PM
Sounds like 15,000 members is WAY more than enough given the anecdotes about the lines, including bohuma's 1:46 post.
Something is wrong.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 1:59 PM
"many many people for whom it is only a community or a 'social' choice"
This is the most frequently cited reason to join, in my experience.
Posted by: infinitejester at October 26, 2009 2:04 PM
dreamking --
the people ragging on the coop on this thread are for the most part not members and they are not posting in order to try to improve the coop.
kind of like you. you don't belong, you don't know anything about the history or culture of the coop and the centrality of the work system, and yet you spend your time writing heartfelt critiques of the place. why?
the coop has grown exponentially in membership and sales since i joined over 15 years ago. i guess the leadership is doing something right.
Posted by: southbrooklyn at October 26, 2009 2:09 PM
I wonder if the Coop would frown on a member paying someone minimum wage to work their 3 hours / month? I mean, an additional $21.75 / month seems like a real bargain for the "privilege" of being a Coop member. (Just kidding)
Posted by: CarrollGardened at October 26, 2009 2:21 PM
CULT. The cart walkers are fucking funny. I won't push your cart full of groceries only after I dropped you off. What kind of fucking stupidity is that. This place is fucking stupid. Fucking loopy. Who is making all the money in this joint. And if you really want to do something for the community SHOP AT KEY FOOD AND START ASKING FOR LOCAL ORGANIC PRODUCTS AT KEY FOOD
Posted by: billyboomer at October 26, 2009 2:22 PM
The co-op has it's pros and cons...like most things in New York. They do have excellent produce at great prices. The prices on spices can't be beat. I do much shopping at the co-op, but I also shop at other grocery stores too for convenience. My household also currently owes work to the co-op...so that sucks! But...If you don't like the idea of the co-op, go to Garden of Eden and pay for the prices. Or Key Food tonight and your food will spoil by Wednesday. I do all three, it's all about choices and money.
And yes...people from all walks of life shop and work at the Park Slope co-op. They take EBT cards, as do the Farmer's Markets. Ignorance is blissful, embiggen your circles if you assume that people from all walks of life don't live and shop in every neighborhood in this city.
Posted by: cillmylandlord_again at October 26, 2009 2:23 PM
I'm pretty sure the author is having a good laugh at everyone's expense (including her own).
The reaction only validates her point - people in this town have no sense of humor about themselves and their lives. It's what makes the co-op so insufferable.
Get the joke people!
Posted by: hp at October 26, 2009 2:52 PM
I can't read all these posts, but I find it funny how the coop arouses so much ire. It has its quirks, but offers great food at great prices and clearly does serve the community very well, given that it has 15,000 members, who are a diverse group (contrary to the beliefs of some people). I think people just like to rag on it but most of the people who do are not members, and tend to speak in broad-sweeping cliches that are actually very boring. Kind of the way people love to poke fun of Park slope without really knowing the community that well...
Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 26, 2009 2:54 PM
*rob* : "if you think the people who shop at the coop come from 'all walks of life' you are insane."
* * * *
Rob, you've obviously never set foot in the place because you couldn't be more wrong. The Co-op is one of the few places you can go to see corporate lawyers, Rastafarians, low-income people of all races and backgrounds, creative types of all kinds and large Hasidic families all shopping and working together. To me, this is one of the nicest aspects of the Co-op, along with the awesome prices and glorious produce.
Having said this, however, I must admit that the mismanagement and rigid, Soviet-era rules and ambience drove me away more than once (i.e., after two stints at membership, one lasting about 4 years and another about 1 year). I'd gladly shop there again and pay a higher price for their products than working members, but the old-guard managers find this morally reprehensible. They'd rather deal with the chaos of 15,000 people each working shifts of 2.75 hours each month, customers standing in hour-long lines to go through *three* checkout procedures to purchase their groceries, and massive cheating by superfluous member-workers.
Posted by: Park Sloper at October 26, 2009 2:59 PM
I don't get the ire either. But given that much of it comes from folks who have never even been there, who cares what the blowhards think?
Posted by: DitmasSnark at October 26, 2009 3:01 PM
@southbrooklyn - I do appreciate you feel my comments are heartfelt. Working at a non-profit and seeing the consequences of ideologically-tinged waste is part of my motivation. I like to think I have a brain, and can help ponder how to make things better. I like the idea of co-ops, and would love to join a sane one in my neighborhood. I care about Brooklyn, people and my city.
Not enough?
Posted by: dreamking at October 26, 2009 3:03 PM
Oh, I think most of the ire comes from the fact a lot of people who would seriously consider joining for an annual membership fee cannot imagine giving up more of their time.
They find it weird/disconerting that the co-op has a policy that basically says "if you or your spouse have a busy life, you cannot join with us".
People don't like being excluded.
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 3:07 PM
Well, I think the fact that all the members work there actually is a plus, since there is a sense of community that comes from that level playing field. I've had a few run-ins at the coop with the occasional bad apple, but I think that's all they are (as will be the case in any big group of people) - most folks at the coop are normal and nice, and just want good food, and good prices, and also like the community aspect to members all working together. I've shopped at coops where you can pay a membership fee and I actually prefer the PSFC, but that's me. Anyway, I do think many people complaining here are just blowing hot air based largely on myths, stereotypes and unfounded rumors. Not to say no one has ever had a bad experience there - I'm sure some folks have - but it seems that's the exception, not the rule (but an exception that I suppose is fun to write 2000+ word articles about).
Posted by: Miss Muffett at October 26, 2009 3:15 PM
I've walked by it so I feel that I can comment.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 3:17 PM
"if you or your spouse have a busy life, you cannot join with us".
Reword. If you or your spouse aren't creative enough to find 2.75 hours out of the ~600hrs a month the co-op is open, you don't really value it enough, and thus the feeling is mutual.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 3:18 PM
i think the teenagers of park slope should be FORCED to work at the co-op.
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 3:20 PM
CARGAR that is an awesome idea!!! if anyone wants to pay me to do their hours ill gladly do it :)
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 3:21 PM
WOW!!! I had no inkling that rather winding article would lead to such wordy comments. I couldn't even get through them all and I'm kind of reluctant to add anything.
But since not too many of the posters appear are coop members here goes (by the way, Hi Babs!):
***You join the coop agreeing to work a shift and stick to it. You can fulfill hours under a couple of different scheme that are not cyclic work cycles--the main one helps freelancers and such who can do a project (say, graphic design, research, editing) over a few days and manage to fulfill their yearly requirements.
***There are exceptions to the work requirement. The coop is very liberal with new baby/adoption (caregivers get a long hiatus from work requirements); certain disabilities, illness/recovery, age can reduce/eliminate your required time; you can now "retire" from the work requirement (age+years of membership equal a certain number). You can go on leave and not work as well.
***The coop is founded on the timebank kind of idea in that everyone's time is equal one to the other. So, maybe you're a judge and you cashier. Maybe your salary's well into the 6-figure range and you do checkout; maybe you receive food stamp benefits and you're a squad leader; maybe you live off a trust fund and do maintenance. All-in-all, it's the most eclectic, friendly community where you can talk to anyone...a very unusual place in, yes eclectic, but fractured Brooklyn.
***Anyone can join. Just sign up for the twice weekly orientations. Because the membership has seen such incredible growth the last couple of years, you can no longer "walk in" to an orientation but must sign up and be scheduled for one. Once you've had orientation, you can shop immediately. BTW, people live far afield and become or move and remain members (The Bronx, Nassau, Suffolk, Westchester, NJ, PA, CT).
***I've seen kids and teenagers whose parents/caregivers are members who grow up with a great sense of fairness, awareness of the food they eat, managing responsibility, etc.
***The coop is the only food-shopping I know of in NYC where you have excellent childcare. If you work your shift or shop during the childcare hours, you can drop off your kid. For all of those new parents out there...WOW! Sure, IKEA has childcare *and* they have that bad-food little shopping area, but I won't count them. I wonder if people drop their kid at IKEA and manage to run to Fairway...
***Coop member/employees are well-paid, have good benefits and health insurance. It is beyond competitive. There is nothing comparable, even in California where grocery store workers have a union.
***From what I remember, the coop has the highest product turnover in Brooklyn.
***The coop has the freshest, organic local produce that I know of...and cheap? Can we talk?! The coop strives to source food and products from equitable employers, fair trade labels, coop producers, local farms, humane animal husbandry;
***The coop has an active Kosher committee that does an excellent job. There is also a committee working on food safety/researching GMOs.
***The coop hosts community learning events, health and healing seminars, films showings, clothing and household item exchanges/drives, food collection for a local soup kitchen (both daily with fresh food from the coop's stock and periodically with food drives asking mbrs to donate non-perishables).
***The coop is one of the sponsor organizations of the Brooklyn Food Conference.
***The coop hosts fun events at local venues.
And if you've made it this far, from my observation the coop is an active meeting place for young people interested in what young people are usually interested in! :-)
Sure. There are lines, but certainly not all the time. I kind of enjoy a not-too-long line because you end up chatting with people. You know all those interesting vegetables and fruits that you have no idea how to cook/eat. Well, at the coop, just ask anyone around and you'll likely get a friendly receipt or two!
So, come, try, enjoy. And if it's not for you, so be it.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 3:27 PM
"if you or your spouse have a busy life, you cannot join with us".
Reword. If you or your spouse aren't creative enough to find 2.75 hours out of the ~600hrs a month the co-op is open, you don't really value it enough, and thus the feeling is mutual.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 3:18 PM
ROTFLMMFAO THIS IS JUST THE TYPE OF ATTITUDE THAT MAKES THE REST OF US MOCK THE PLACE!!!!!!!
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 3:28 PM
quote:
There are exceptions to the work requirement. The coop is very liberal with new baby/adoption (caregivers get a long hiatus from work requirements);
:-/
*rob*
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 3:29 PM
"'cuz we all know that the author deserves to get her pie without paying the entire price for it, and definitely, absolutely, is gonna come back with that $4."...you missed the point. She's talking about being treated with a measure of flexibility, which the Coop actively discourages, and courtesy.
To those who think people join the Co-op for social reasons, hardly. I think most join because of the great food and low prices (certainly the lower-income folk), and endure the crappy rules.
Yes, there are many more than 33 people "working" at the store at any time. About half are looking for things to do, or otherwise pretending they're on a chore.
No, many "squad leaders" do not enforce the 2-makeup rule, especially if you call in: in 8 years there, I've only had it enforced once out of say 50 misses. Most accept that you may have other priorities or emergencies. On the other hand, there are the weird power-mad squad leaders looking to enforce every picayune rule.
As the writer correctly points out (and I've tried to get clarified unsuccessfully), why does the checkout worker demand to see id (and by rule you have to show it, not just say your number)? You needed it to get in; if on the off-chance you sneaked your way in, what harm?...you're paying for your groceries anyway.
Posted by: cmu at October 26, 2009 3:30 PM
I think some mock the place because it irks their sensibilities that a cooperative market can be so succesful for so many years. As the thread starts by saying 'comrades'...is only proof of that. If not real capitalism they will mock and insult,etc.
I'd rather work for the coop than walmart. Thankfully I don't work for either.
Posted by: Petebklyn at October 26, 2009 3:33 PM
"If you or your spouse aren't creative enough to find 2.75 hours out of the ~600hrs a month the co-op is open, you don't really value it enough, and thus the feeling is mutual."
Working parents with small kid: There is nothing creative about it.
Mon-Fri 6:00am-8:30pm are accounted for and then exhaustion sets in.
There is one and only one place the time can come from -- the precious few hours they have together on the weekends.
I'd rate those hours at about $150/hr (which is much less than I make in my day job, but what it would cost to make me think about giving up those hours).
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 3:34 PM
Dave,
A lot of people have walked by BedStuy...as you have walked by the co-op. That said...a lot of places have pros & cons. I mock a lot of places in New York too...I think this posting is super funny to me.
I'll say this...If you don't cook or care about food costs, don't join. But having an arguement with a co-op manager over having to return molded muenster cheese and her statement that muenster cheese comes aged...is a con. Of course, she wanted to find a rule to state that cheese cannot be returned and she couldn't. So, again pros and cons to the co-op. But, the savings for me...is a pro.
Posted by: cillmylandlord_again at October 26, 2009 3:35 PM
"it's also about the camaraderie that comes from the experience of knowing that you and all of your fellow-members, who come from all walks of life, are treated identically, and that you are all working together to support the organization."
You can get the same thing from a weekend softball team.
Posted by: East New York at October 26, 2009 3:50 PM
BrooklynGreene -- I'm not a member and none of my comments put into question the *concept* of using member for labor. My biggest issue that seems to be common (from my member friends, this article, and comments above) is that the labor is not used WISELY.
It's great to approach the coop in an egalitarian way -- the supreme court judge's time is *worth* the same as the unemployed welfare recipient. However, SKILLS need to be taken into account.
The comment from a member was made above that the work scheduling system is not online! This is completely shocking to me! Of the 15,000 members, I'm sure there are many qualified people to build and maintain such a system. However, instead it seems they are cashiers, door guards and cleaning produce.... all of which probably needs to happen, but SKILLS NEED TO BE UTILIZED.
Also, the overall size of the membership strikes me as inappropriate. If the number 15,000 is accurate and represents the *active* members.... then that means there would be about 30 shoppers in the store at any given moment IF each member only shopped for an hour ONCE A MONTH.... not to mention spread out evenly. I can't think this is right. Do you know the *actual* number of active member/shoppers? 15,000 sounds physically crippling to a store that size.
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 3:52 PM
"You can get the same thing from a weekend softball team."
ENY, and you scoffed at the notion of a weekend kickball team!
Posted by: CarrollGardened at October 26, 2009 3:57 PM
regardless of what you thought of the article, you've got to admit: those illustrations were fantastic!!!!
Posted by: patronzo at October 26, 2009 4:01 PM
Oh, and by the way, although my long posts tend to be thread extinguishers, I have to add:
***No, paying more money yearly so you don't have to work is antithetical to the coop's principals...
***...as is paying someone minimum wage to do your hours...that's just gross and misses the point. [Also, understand someone can work your hours for you, but that person needs to be a member as well.]
***Each "squad" sets its own make-up rules. Some shifts require a member to make up two shifts for any shift missed. They have to be made up before the next regularly schedule shift (therefore, within 4 weeks). Some shifts only require 1 make-up, especially if the member has made an effort to call one of the squad leaders in advance to let him/her know.
Disclosure: I'm a squad leader and enjoy working with my group...my shift is a diverse group of people from their 20's through their 60's (possibly 70's but who's talkin'?!). We have people who work in the arts, are stay-at-home caregivers, teachers, small business owners, lawyers, RNs and an MD, people who work in finance, students, persons seeking work, fire and police department and other City employees, performers, musicians.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 4:05 PM
"***...as is paying someone minimum wage to do your hours...that's just gross and misses the point"
Did you not notice the words "just joking" at the end of my post, BrooklynGreene? Speaking of people who need to lighten up a bit . . .
Posted by: CarrollGardened at October 26, 2009 4:11 PM
So BrooklynGreene, can I join and pay someone to work all of my required hours??? Is there a system set up there to organize that???
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 4:15 PM
Sorry, I meant "antithetical to the coop's principles"...oops.
Look, okay, okay, there has been a lot of talk about reducing work time/frequency. More to come on that.
But to be frank, sometimes we don't have ENOUGH people working our shift. What with no-shows, we sometimes really have to pull together to get the place moving. Sure, indeed, there are people who stand around (mostly younger members)"pretending" to work...reminding me teenagers who are being forced to do chores but knowing they can zoom out soon anyway). But on our shift there is very little lolly-gagging. We're busy-busy-busy and, yes, I do find myself pulling Mom-rank and smilingly find tasks for people doing makeup shifts who appear to be drifting...
Working my squad I have to say I've learned to say "no" with a smile. Not something we're necessarily taught in childhood.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 4:19 PM
"ENY, and you scoffed at the notion of a weekend kickball team!"
I sure did! Softball is an actual sport that requires some athletic ability and skill.
Unless you are in fact a child (age 12 or under), KICKBALL is an idiotic, post-yuppie perversion of sport that allows completely uncoordinated, sport-ignorant people to be marginally athletic. Is it any wonder it's a favorite activity among annoying HIPSTERS in flannel shirts???? Don't get me started!
Posted by: East New York at October 26, 2009 4:19 PM
DIBS: the "worker" has to a member also, but I'm sure someone'll be willing.
Posted by: cmu at October 26, 2009 4:21 PM
"KICKBALL is an idiotic, post-yuppie perversion of sport that allows completely uncoordinated, sport-ignorant people to be marginally athletic."
lol
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 4:21 PM
ENY, please come back to the OT so we can spar over kickball and Chows, LOL!
Posted by: CarrollGardened at October 26, 2009 4:22 PM
Sorry Carroll G.,
I wasn't reading for nuance considering there was so much nonsense commenting to wade through contributed by non-coop members. I kind of skimmed.
And Dave, I think you might enjoy the coop. There may be some "added value" you could get into.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 4:23 PM
DIBS, heehee, i did that on purpose, glad you got it. But tongue-out-of-cheek, there is truth to it. Life's about choosing where to put your scarce resources.
Rob's comment about forcing Park Slope's kids into labor might be the only thing he said this month that makes sense to me. Not just the Slope though, all kids should have to work to appreciate what they have. Many of the haters sound like they were raised as entitled snobs, laying on beanbags playing PS3 while mommy did everything.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 4:24 PM
Oh goody, ow we can bash hipsters for a while. This whole coop crunchygranola bashing was getting tiresome.
OK, your mission - should you choose to accept it - is to write a punchline to this riddle:
"How many hipsters does it take to change a lightbulb?"
Posted by: DitmasSnark at October 26, 2009 4:25 PM
BrooklynGreene, my dance card is pretty full already. That said, I'm sure the Coop has a lot of great exotic offerings that I'd love to pick through. :)
How many different types of mushrooms are there???
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 4:26 PM
Answer -- none. Darkness is so ironic.
Posted by: babs at October 26, 2009 4:29 PM
"How many hipsters does it take to change a lightbulb?"
Hipsters prefer candlelight and thus are ignorant of lightbulb-related technologies.
HA! HA! That was fun.
Posted by: East New York at October 26, 2009 4:30 PM
I've been asked to work there tonight and I'm not even a member.
Posted by: dittoburg at October 26, 2009 4:32 PM
No problem, BrooklynGreene.
Posted by: CarrollGardened at October 26, 2009 4:34 PM
Three. One to change it, one to write about it on twitter and one to post it on facebook.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 4:37 PM
It's all good just as long as Brooklyn Green doesn't post any more haiku.
Posted by: East New York at October 26, 2009 4:38 PM
Again, here's what I don't get. BrookylnGreene, if the coop is so successful why not expand? If people are coming there from all over Brooklyn, wouldn't it make more sense to open more stores in different neighborhoods? I've heard that's an idea that has been discussed, but for some reason keeps getting shot down. Why?
Posted by: Heather at October 26, 2009 4:38 PM
WOW...100 comments on a place that sells fennel. FTW.
Posted by: BSD at October 26, 2009 4:39 PM
DIBS: Four.
Added to yours, there is also one to post the video on YouTube.
Posted by: DitmasSnark at October 26, 2009 4:40 PM
With 13,000 member, if that's correct, they could charge each one $100 a year and employ 26 people at $50,000 per year!!!!!!!!!
At some point the model needs to change.
Posted by: daveinbedstuy at October 26, 2009 4:41 PM
northsloperenter --
my spouse and i have an 18 m old. we are active coop members who rarely miss our 6-8:30 receiving shifts. it isn't hard to get up a little earlier once a month.
Posted by: southbrooklyn at October 26, 2009 4:41 PM
"FTW"
Fuck The What?
Posted by: dittoburg at October 26, 2009 4:41 PM
"my spouse and i have an 18 m old. we are active coop members who rarely miss our 6-8:30 receiving shifts. it isn't hard to get up a little earlier once a month."
Get up earlier? What are you talking about? You must have the greatest 18 m old ever.
I was up 4:30 today, 6:15 Sunday, 5:45 Saturday...
If I suddenly find myself with 3 spare hours, I'm sure as heck taking nap!
Posted by: northsloperenter at October 26, 2009 4:43 PM
heather, no one is shooting down the formation of coops in other places in brooklyn. in fact, if you join the park slope food coop, your work shift can be helping groups in other neighborhoods get their coops up and running. i believe the coop has provided member labor to a coop in east new york, and possibly also fort greene. it is part of the park slope mission statement to support other coops. but i guess it's hard to get a coop like the psfc going. it took a long time for the psfc to grow into something like a supermarket.
Posted by: southbrooklyn at October 26, 2009 4:47 PM
greatest 18m old? she wakes twice a night, at 10 and 4, goes back to sleep pretty quickly, but still. i go to bed early!
Posted by: southbrooklyn at October 26, 2009 4:51 PM
BrooklynGreene -- I'm sort of disappointed you didn't have anything to say about my direct comment to you.
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 4:52 PM
I was going to read all the comments but then decided they'll probably all be about the Co-op, so why bother.
Anyone want to sum it up for me?
Posted by: Tara in the Slope at October 26, 2009 5:10 PM
Yes, Heather, what many of us want to know...why the coop cannot have multiple locations. I do know the idea has been studied. The coop cannot really expand in its current locations since the firehouse is on one side and the schoolyard on the other.
In the past, members were pusing for a branch on our side of the tracks (Fort Greene). It was shot down by a couple of people who had pull and wanted to go another route. It may have been the best way to go at the time. I won't comment.
What the coop IS doing now, please note, is lending a lot of support to the GreenHill Coop.
Dave, I think there are fresh, organic: crimini, shitake, portabello, champignon de Paris, oyster, those thin white stringy ones (Japanese), lobster, chaterelle, another one like oyster but not as floppy...and there are a lot of dried mushrooms, I think dried morels, etc.
For better or for worse, the coop has gone gourmet to some extend over the years. I don't mind it but I think it is probably a little off-putting to those on tight budgets. Then again, people who have tight food budgets, can actually afford what is elsewhere often way-overpriced health food and gourmet item.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 5:37 PM
I'll give it a shot...
*** There's a grocery store in Park Slope.
*** It is a "workers cooperative" business that is owned (and run) by it's member/owner/workers.
*** There are 15,000 members.
*** The store is in operation approximately 500 hrs per month.
*** The members must work a combined 41,250 hours per month.
*** In addition to members, there are also paid employees that receive amazing benefits.
*** It takes approximately 100 man hours for every hours the store operates.
*** This would average out to approximately 30-40 workers at any given moment, but is probably some stiflingly high number because most folks aren't available for 3 hours on a Tuesay afternoon.
*** It is based on an egalitarian approach -- taking neither socioeconomic status nor member skillsets into account -- you are assigned work according to the schedule!
*** It has very fresh produce and other nice food.
*** The members receive an indeterminate "discount" in comparison to other retailers in exchange for their membership and labor.
*** It has grown into a inflexible machine rooted in the status quo and uninterested in adapting to either the external environment or the sudden change in its membership.
*** The vast majority of the membership are perfectly happy with this position and if you don't like it, you can leave.
*** There are "squad leaders" that don't enforce the rules and there are other that are strict rule followers -- thus creating inequity and favoritism in this Utopian society.
*** They employ little to no modern (post-1980s) technology to improve the operation of the business or the customer/member's experience
*** The store is teaming with low-income food stamp recipients.
*** You don't have to work when you're sick.
*** You don't have to care for your own child when your grocery shopping (feel the love)
*** There is an AMAZING social element that rivals your college experience at Sarah Lawrence.
*** They have kosher food, which apparently is both hard to find in Brooklyn and requires a committee to sell it.
I think that covers it.
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 5:52 PM
Sorry Tybur...Yes, people's skills could be used more appropriately...maybe...but still, with just 2 1/2 hours once a month (actually 13x per year), I'm not sure what kind of skilled tasks could/need to be assigned. People can sometimes barely remember how to work the register when they only work once a month. The first couple of months for a newbie and you have to retrain them each time.
Granted, there are people (some who aren't even required to work) who come in extra time and do specific tasks they like, some of which take certain skills/knowledge sets.
And, as I mentioned what we call "future time off" people who may work on one project can quickly fulfill their yearly work requirement. They may work on things that are more related to their jobs/skills (working on the newspaper for example).
Tara,
Executive Summary:
A) Coop members generally like the coop and see where things might be improved or changed. Some of them are acutely aware how non-members might be put off by the coop if they come for a tour on a busy day.
B) Non-coop members mouth off a lot and make cutesy comments.
C) After years hearing about the coop, non-members join and are hooked.
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 5:53 PM
(sorry, my 'executive' summary did have a few cutesy comments... though I would argue that it does capture much of the conversation above.)
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 6:01 PM
> those thin white stringy ones (Japanese)
http://www.foodsubs.com/Mushroom.html#enoki ?
Posted by: DitmasSnark at October 26, 2009 6:25 PM
That was beautiful, Tybur!!!
Posted by: Park Sloper at October 26, 2009 6:37 PM
Oh yes Ditmas! Enoki! I've bought them at the coop but couldn't remember the name.
Tybur, it's rather unseemly...us having our own conversation...but here goes:
Actually, now that we take debit cards (we took EBT cards of course before that), we're kind of up to snuff technology-wise. Look at it this way: members work about 2 1/2 hours per month. The systems have to be simple and rather “elegant” as they say (“elegant solutions”? hahaha…but yes, a lot of thought goes into these kinds of upgrades). The checkout and cashier areas are very easy to do now...touch screens, scanning, etc. You can only expect so much from people when they do a task for a couple of hours once a month.
Regarding skills and socioeconomic status. Look at it as opportunities to learn NEW skills, work differently with people than, maybe, you might need to do in your day-to-day job...this is a good thing, learning differently kinds of people skills.
There is no undetermined "discount". Prices are based on a mark-up from wholesale. If the wholesale price changes, the shelf price changes. I think this is a wonderful control on people eating foods out of season. There is a lot of research in eating in-season which I won't/can't go into here. But, for example, it's not bad when gorgeous organic tomatoes are 59-cents per pound...apples are cheaper than at a farmers' market, etc. Note that most supermarkets keep prices as flat as possible during the year so you end up paying prices that are artificially high all year long, encourage a race to the bottom scenario (that also has a huge carbon footprint) when out-of-season foods are shipped from abroad (middlemen looking for the lowest price possible), and don't support regional growers and food inter- and independence. When retail prices fluctuate noticeably during the year, people self-manage their choices and purchasing patterns.
It’s also intensely interesting to someone like me to see when prices shift and what those shifts are.
The coop IS dynamic. There have been big changes over the years and there has been an incredible adjustment the last years when membership ballooned. People are working hard on figuring out options and strategies.
Regarding kosher food: understand that the people buying it are often the people or know the people who are packing it. This is a great thing for many who rely on store bought kosher food. Also, the only kosher chicken (and chicken liver) available is organic'n'humane at the coop.
There are basic guidelines for squads. I wouldn't say it's a mess. Basically, the guideline rules are “you miss a shift and you have to do two make up slots”. Very few squads deviate from this. Make ups are easy: walk in for a shift, say "Hi, I'm here to do a make up," fill in doing your regular job, or learn a new one, or be a "walker" and bring people to their cars or homes.
By the way, did I ever mention the coop DOES do shopping and delivery for homebound members? Someone's comment above struck me.
Tybur, to be honest, go online to the website and sign up for an orientation. It sounds like you might as well join and do it for while to see what you think. I'd love to hear your report in 6 months.
:-)
Posted by: BrooklynGreene at October 26, 2009 6:44 PM
it winds up sounding like a place where cheap a$$ people go to buy food. instead of being that lady who whips out 5000 coupons, you just work a few hours a month. is that 20 cents you save on a tomato worth your dignity?
*rob*(
Posted by: Butterfly at October 26, 2009 8:33 PM
The co-op accepts coupons too, don't they?
Posted by: tybur6 at October 26, 2009 9:04 PM
WTF-I've come across more crazies on this site in three weeks than in 3 years at the coop. I forget how New Yorkers are totally conservative when it comes to alternative lifestyles. But this was fun-let's do it all again tomorrow and waste another 2.75hours....
Posted by: jib at October 26, 2009 10:47 PM
After reading all these comments, I am more interested in joining than ever, but live too far away. Other coops without the work requirement don't have the same quality, exceptionally low prices, or diversity.
Posted by: mopar at October 26, 2009 11:10 PM
If this place is so awful, how has it managed to keep growing? Answer me that, sourpusses. Just as well the complainers here (about an institution that they have never joined) don't go anywhere near the place.
Posted by: David Lewis at October 27, 2009 11:07 AM
Thanks for that jib. The fact that the author's 2000 words has merited 15,000 words from the snark squad is absurd. I've just joined the coop and couldn't be happier. My interactions with the staff and other members have been nothing but lovely. And how nice is to share a smile at the checkout instead of the usual grunt one receives at Key Food.
Posted by: agitzy at October 28, 2009 12:24 PM
I really wish so badly they would open more branches in other neighborhoods.
Posted by: mopar at October 28, 2009 4:27 PM

Post a comment
Please be patient while your comment is published. It may take a moment.